Antibiotic Resistance in Food Animals in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 648-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luria Leslie Founou ◽  
Daniel Gyamfi Amoako ◽  
Raspail Carrel Founou ◽  
Sabiha Yusuf Essack
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Food Animals

Comments on the published systematic review and meta-analysis on the increasing antibiotic resistance in Clostridioides difficile

Anaerobe ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 102141
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Kouhsari ◽  
Sara Hayati Mehr ◽  
Mohammad Sholeh ◽  
Nima Mohammadzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

scholarly journals A global perspective of antibiotic-resistant Listeria monocytogenes prevalence in assorted ready to eat foods: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 2219-2229
Author(s):  
Prudence Mpundu ◽  
Allan Rabson Mbewe ◽  
John Bwalya Muma ◽  
Wizaso Mwasinga ◽  
Nawa Mukumbuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Resistance Profile ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance Profile ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Insight Into

Background and Aim: Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods remains consistently under-reported globally. Nevertheless, several independent studies conducted to investigate have elucidated the prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of L. monocytogenes in RTE-associated foods and their antibiotic resistance profiles. Given the rapid increase in consumption of RTE foods of both animal and plant origin, it is imperative to know the prevalence deductive data focusing on how much of L. monocytogenes is present in RTE foods, which is critical for food safety managers and retailers to assess the possible risk posed to end-users. In addition, valuable insight and another angle to the depth of the problem, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available data regarding the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and antibiotic resistance profiles. Materials and Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis study of L. monocytogenes and antibiotic resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics to determine the extent of L. monocytogenes contamination in RTE foods and antibiotic resistance profiles. The primary search terms, also known as keywords used, were restricted to peer-reviewed and review articles, and databases, including Google Scholars, Science-Direct, and Scopus, were searched. The inclusion of articles meeting eligibility criteria published between 2010 and 2020 after title, abstract, and full article screening. Data analysis was performed at multiple stages using quantitative meta-analysis reviews. Results: L. monocytogenes pooled proportion/prevalence was highest in chicken products determined at (22%) followed by various but uncategorized RTE foods at 21%. Regarding antibiotic resistance, profiling's highest pooled prevalence resistance was observed in penicillin at 80% resistance, followed by cephalosporin at 47%. Conclusion: Within its limitations, this study has attempted to provide insight into the pooled proportion/prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and the antibiotic resistance profile at the global level. Determining the proportion/ prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods across the globe and antibiotic resistance profile is essential for providing quality food and reducing public health problems due to unsuccessful treatment of foodborne illness. This study provides insight into the pooled prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and the antibiotic resistance profile. The results of this study partly endeavored to help appropriate authorities strengthen their preventive measures on specific RTE foods that are most likely to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes and antibiotic resistance profiles.

Increasing antibiotic resistance in Clostridioides difficile: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anaerobe ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 35-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srishti Saha ◽  
Saloni Kapoor ◽  
Raseen Tariq ◽  
Audrey N. Schuetz ◽  
Pritish K. Tosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

scholarly journals Comparison of different approaches to antibiotic restriction in food-producing animals: stratified results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e001710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L Tang ◽  
Niamh P Caffrey ◽  
Diego B Nóbrega ◽  
Susan C Cork ◽  
Paul E Ronksley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Growth Promoter ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Differential Effectiveness ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Meta Analyses

BackgroundWe have previously reported, in a systematic review of 181 studies, that restriction of antibiotic use in food-producing animals is associated with a reduction in antibiotic-resistant bacterial isolates. While informative, that report did not concretely specify whether different types of restriction are associated with differential effectiveness in reducing resistance. We undertook a sub-analysis of the systematic review to address this question.MethodsWe created a classification scheme of different approaches to antibiotic restriction: (1) complete restriction; (2) single antibiotic-class restriction; (3) single antibiotic restriction; (4) all non-therapeutic use restriction; (5) growth promoter and prophylaxis restriction; (6) growth promoter restriction and (7) other/undetermined. All studies in the original systematic review that were amenable to meta-analysis were included into this substudy and coded by intervention type. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models, stratified by intervention type.ResultsA total of 127 studies were included. The most frequently studied intervention type was complete restriction (n=51), followed by restriction of non-therapeutic (n=33) and growth promoter (n=19) indications. None examined growth promoter and prophylaxis restrictions together. Three and seven studies examined single antibiotic-class and single antibiotic restrictions, respectively; these two intervention types were not significantly associated with reductions in antibiotic resistance. Though complete restrictions were associated with a 15% reduction in antibiotic resistance, less prohibitive approaches also demonstrated reduction in antibiotic resistance of 9%–30%.ConclusionBroad interventions that restrict global antibiotic use appear to be more effective in reducing antibiotic resistance compared with restrictions that narrowly target one specific antibiotic or antibiotic class. Importantly, interventions that allow for therapeutic antibiotic use appear similarly effective compared with those that restrict all uses of antibiotics, suggesting that complete bans are not necessary. These findings directly inform the creation of specific policies to restrict antibiotic use in food-producing animals.

Correlation Between Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA and MSSA Isolated from Clinical Samples in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1071-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motaharesadat Hosseini ◽  
Abbas Shapouri Moghaddam ◽  
Solmaz Derakhshan ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Amin Hashemipour ◽  
Mehdi Hadadi-Fishani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Samples
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document