Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Extraperitoneal Video Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Potency Rates after 1 Year Follow Up

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2327-2332
Author(s):  
J. Travassos ◽  
F. Figueiredo ◽  
A.O. Xavier ◽  
K. De Juan
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Nerve Sparing

1172: Improved Recovery of Erectile Function with Nightly Low dose Sildenafil - 18 Months Follow-Up After Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 386-387
Author(s):  
Andreas Bannowsky ◽  
Heiko Schulze ◽  
Christof van der Horst ◽  
Stefan Hautmann ◽  
Klaus P. Juenemann
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Nerve Sparing

V1540: Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate (KTP) Laser Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effects on Cavernous Nerve Function in a Canine Model

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 508-509
Author(s):  
Troy R. Gianduzzo ◽  
Jose R. Colombo ◽  
Georges-Pascal Haber ◽  
Kester Nahen ◽  
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Canine Model ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Potassium Titanyl Phosphate ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Ktp Laser ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Cavernous Nerve

Does intrafascial dissection during nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compromise cancer control?

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1730-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mischel G. Neill ◽  
Mark Louie-Johnsun ◽  
Charles Chabert ◽  
Christopher Eden
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Nerve Sparing

804: Laser Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effects of Potassium-Titanylphosphate (KTP) Laser on Cavernous Nerve Function in a Survival Canine Model

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Troy R. Gianduzzo ◽  
Jose R. Colombo ◽  
Georges-Pascal Haber ◽  
Kester Nahen ◽  
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Canine Model ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Ktp Laser ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Cavernous Nerve

796 INTRAFASCIAL NERVE SPARING RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; OUR TECHNIQUE AND ONE YEAR FOLLOW UP RESULTS

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
W.Y. Khoder ◽  
M. Seitz ◽  
O. Reich ◽  
A.J. Becker ◽  
A. Büchner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Does transition from standard to Retzius-sparing technique in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy affect the functional and oncological outcomes?

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-403
Author(s):  
Hakan Anıl ◽  
Kaan Karamık ◽  
Ali Yıldız ◽  
Murat Savaş
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Continence Status ◽  
Oncological Results ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective: To appraise the outcomes on the Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (Rs-RARP) learning curve of a surgeon with previous experience of anterior (standard) RARP. Materials and methods: The first 50 cases during the Rs-RARP learning curve (group 1) and 50 cases after the second 100 cases with the standard approach (group 2) were comprised in the study. Patients who used zero or one safety pads were considered continent. Erectile function recuperation was characterized as the competence to achieve penetrative intercourse without receiving any medication. All patients were reevaluated at two weeks, first, third, sixth, and 12th months after surgery using IIEF-5, PSA level, and continence status. Results: Immediate continence rates following catheter removal were 32/50 (64%) in Rs-RARP group and 26/50 (52%) in S-RARP group (p = 0.224). The continence recovery rate was 48/50 (96%) in Rs-RARP group and 46/50 (92%) in the S-RARP group at 12 months follow-up (p = 0.400). Total nerve-sparing surgery was enforced in 36/50 (72%) patients for group 1 and 35/50 (70%) patients for group 2. Potency recovery was 27/43 (62.8%) in Rs-RARP and 30/44 (68.2%) for S-RARP at 12 months follow up (p = 0.597). Surgical margin positivity was detected in 6/50 (12%) cases in the Rs-RARP group and in 4/50 (8%) cases in the S-RARP (p = 0.444). Conclusions: Functional and oncological results are not negatively affected in the first 50 cases for a surgeon who is experienced in S-RARP before transition to the Rs-RARP method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document