scholarly journals Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Between Abdominal and Upper Arm Insertion Sites

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Isa Kristin Steineck ◽  
Zeinab Mahmoudi ◽  
Ajenthen Ranjan ◽  
Signe Schmidt ◽  
John Bagterp Jørgensen ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoeri M. Luijf ◽  
Angelo Avogaro ◽  
Carsten Benesch ◽  
Daniela Bruttomesso ◽  
Claudio Cobelli ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1092-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Mahmoudi ◽  
Mette Dencker Johansen ◽  
Hanne Holdflod Nørgaard ◽  
Steen Andersen ◽  
Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaya Munekage ◽  
Tomoaki Yatabe ◽  
Masahiko Sakaguchi ◽  
Hiroyuki Kitagawa ◽  
Takahiko Tamura ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Facchinetti ◽  
G. Sparacino ◽  
S. Guerra ◽  
Y. M. Luijf ◽  
J. H. DeVries ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-394
Author(s):  
Kyong Chan Park ◽  
Hwan Jun Choi

A 33-year-old man presented to the plastic surgery department for foreign body removal 1 month after the insertion of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor (Dexcom G5) in the left upper arm. The patient had used the CGM system for 5 years, and the insertion was done in the usual manner. The entire sensor wire was visible on simple radiography and ultrasonography. In the operating room, and the sensor wire was identified in the intermuscular septum and removed. No foreign body reaction or inflammatory signs were found around the CGM, and the extracted wire measured 2.5 cm. Thus, it was assumed that the whole sensor wire was detached from the transmitter, not fractured. No remnant foreign body was observed on follow-up simple radiography.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey I Joseph ◽  
Gabriella Eisler ◽  
David Diaz ◽  
Abdurizzagh Khalf ◽  
Channy Loeum ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 479
Author(s):  
Elena Muñoz Fabra ◽  
José-Luis Díez ◽  
Jorge Bondia ◽  
Alejandro José Laguna Sanz

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) has been a springboard of new diabetes management technologies such as integrated sensor-pump systems, the artificial pancreas, and more recently, smart pens. It also allows patients to make better informed decisions compared to a few measurements per day from a glucometer. However, CGM accuracy is reportedly affected during exercise periods, which can impact the effectiveness of CGM-based treatments. In this review, several studies that used CGM during exercise periods are scrutinized. An extensive literature review of clinical trials including exercise and CGM in type 1 diabetes was conducted. The gathered data were critically analysed, especially the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), as the main metric of glucose accuracy. Most papers did not provide accuracy metrics that differentiated between exercise and rest (non-exercise) periods, which hindered comparative data analysis. Nevertheless, the statistic results confirmed that CGM during exercise periods is less accurate.


Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 609-P
Author(s):  
ALEXANDRA MIGDAL ◽  
KARLA W. ZAMUDIO ◽  
MIREYA C. PEREZ-GUZMAN ◽  
THAER IDREES ◽  
BONNIE S. ALBURY ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document