scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics of HLD200, a Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate: Evaluation of Dose Proportionality, Food Effect, Multiple-Dose Modeling, and Comparative Bioavailability with Immediate-Release Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Liu ◽  
Jogarao V.S. Gobburu ◽  
Michelle D. Po ◽  
Angus McLean ◽  
Norberto J. DeSousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Food Effect ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Dose Proportionality ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Delayed Release ◽  
Comparative Bioavailability

Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of an Oral Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release Formulation in Adults

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (S20) ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan B. Clausen ◽  
Stephanie C. Read ◽  
Simon J. Tulloch
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Dose Proportionality ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Release Formulation ◽  
Extended Release Formulation ◽  
Clinical Research Unit ◽  
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Oral Doses

AbstractObjectives: Assess the bioavailability of mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR) 30-mg capsules and the dose proportionality of pharmacokinetic measures for MAS XR 20,40, and 60 mg.Methods: Study A, an open-label single-period study, and Study B, a randomized, open-label, three threeway crossover study, were conducted in healthy adults in a clinical research unit. In Study A, 20 subjects received a single MAS XR 30-mg capsule by mouth daily for 7 days. In Study B, 12 subjects received single oral doses of MAS XR 20,40, and 60 mg separated by 7-14-day washout periods.Findings: Plasma dextroamphetamine (D-amphetamine) and levoamphetamine (L-amphetamine) concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. In Study A, a 3:1 ratio of D-amphetamine to L-amphetamine was observed for AUC0-∞ and Cmax. Tmax was 4.2 and 4.3 hours for D-amphetamine to Lamphetamine, respectively. In Study B, for D- and Lamphetamine, statistically significant differences were observed for AUC0-t, AVC0-∞, and Cmax between all doses; there was a linear relationship between pharmacokinetic variables and dose and Tmax was similar for each isomer (range: 4.5–5.3 hours) with all given MAS XR doses.Conclusion: The extent of exposure as assessed by mean AUC0-24 and Cmax reflected the 3:1 ratio of D-amphetamine to L-amphetamine in MAS XR 30-mg capsules. The pharmacokinetic profiles of MAS XR 20, 40, and 60 mg are dose proportional for the isomers.

scholarly journals 178 Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablet Compared with Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-313
Author(s):  
Barry K. Herman ◽  
Judith C. Kando ◽  
Thomas King ◽  
Antonio Pardo
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Food Effect ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Oral Suspension ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Comparative Bioavailability ◽  
Extended Release Tablet ◽  
Funding Acknowledgements ◽  
Release Tablet

Abstract:Objectives:Evaluate comparative bioavailability of single-dose amphetamine extended-release tablet (AMPH ER TAB, Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ) 20 mg, swallowed whole or chewed and amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) 2.5 mg/mL; and evaluate whether a PK food effect exists on AMPH ER TAB (contains a 3.2:1 ratio of d- to l-amphetamine).METHODS:Healthy volunteers (18-55 yr) were randomized to 1 dose of AMPH ER TAB 20 mg swallowed (fasted), chewed (fed/fasted), or 20 mg AMPH EROS (fasted).A crossover design was used. Samples were collected each period pre-dose and at time points to 60 h post-dose. D-and l-amphetamine were measured, and PK was calculated (90% CIs of the ratios of the geometric mean plasma levels) for Cmax, AUCt, and AUC0∞. Comparative bioavailability was determined when ratios were within 80 and 125%. Safety was also assessed.RESULTS:32 subjects completed the study. Based on the calculated bioavailability ratios, for AMPH ER TAB swallowed vs. AMPH EROS fasted: d-amphetamine total and peak exposures were found to be similar: AUC0-t: 100.68-108.08%, AUC0-∞:101.47-109.52%, Cmax: 98.10-103.17%. For l-amphetamine, the total and peak exposures were similar: AUC0-t: 100.31-108.57%, AUC0-∞:101.27-111.09%, Cmax: 98.2-103.37%.AMPH ER TAB chewed vs. AMPH EROS fasted: For d-amphetamine, the total and peak exposures were similar: AUC0-t: 99.23-106.62%, AUC0-∞: 99.58-107.59%, Cmax: 99.91-105.14%. For l-amphetamine, the total and peak exposure was similar: AUC0-t: 98.16-106.35%, AUC0-∞: 98.44-108.11%, Cmax: 99.53-104.75%.Food effect: AMPH ER TAB, chewed, fasted vs. fed: For d-amphetamine, the total and peak exposure was similar: AUC0-t: 92.57-99.49%, AUC0-∞: 91.12-98.48%, Cmax: 94.22-99.17%.For l-amphetamine, the total and peak exposure was similar: AUC0-t: 91.27-98.91%, AUC0-∞: 88.44-97.17%, Cmax: 94.52-99.50%).No serious AEs were reported during the conduct of this study, and the AE profiles were observed to be similar in frequency of events and severity to other amphetamine formulations used in ADHD.CONCLUSIONS:Bioavailability of single dose of AMPH ER TAB for both d- and l-amphetamine was comparable, swallowed whole or chewed, to an equivalent 20 mg dose of the reference product AMPH EROS, 2.5 mg/mL fasted, and showed equivalent peak and overall exposure.No food effect was observed for AMPH ER TAB administered chewed. All AEs were mild in severity and AE profiles were similar to other amphetamine formulations used for treatment of ADHD.Funding Acknowledgements:Tris Pharma, Inc.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document