Literary Pattern Recognition: Modernism between Close Reading and Machine Learning

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoyt Long ◽  
Richard Jean So
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Close Reading

Artificial neural network models for coronary artery disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Shamsara ◽  
Sara Saffar Soflaei ◽  
Mohammad Tajfard ◽  
Ivan Yamshchikov ◽  
Habibollah Esmaili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Early Prediction ◽  
Artificial Neural ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Objective : The early prediction of the CAD would be valuable in identifying individuals at risk, and in focusing resources on its prevention. In this paper, we aimed to establish a diagnostic model to predict CAD by using three approaches of ANN (pattern recognition-ANN, LVQ-ANN, and competitive ANN). Methods: One promising method for early prediction of disease based on risk factors is machine learning. Among different machine learning algorithms, the artificial neural network (ANN) algo-rithms have been applied widely in medicine and a variety of real-world classifications. ANN is a non-linear computational model, that is inspired by the human brain to analyze and process complex datasets. Results: Different methods of ANN that are investigated in this paper indicates in both pattern recognition ANN and LVQ-ANN methods, the predictions of Angiography+ class have high accuracy. Moreover, in CNN the correlations between the individuals in cluster ”c” with the class of Angiography+ is strongly high. This accuracy indicates the significant difference among some of the input features in Angiography+ class and the other two output classes. A comparison among the chosen weights in these three methods in separating control class and Angiography+ shows that hs-CRP, FSG, and WBC are the most substantial excitatory weights in recognizing the Angiography+ individuals although, HDL-C and MCH are determined as inhibitory weights. Furthermore, the effect of decomposition of a multi-class problem to a set of binary classes and random sampling on the accuracy of the diagnostic model is investigated. Conclusion : This study confirms that pattern recognition-ANN had the most accuracy of performance among different methods of ANN. That’s due to the back-propagation procedure of the process in which the network classify input variables based on labeled classes. The results of binarization show that decomposition of the multi-class set to binary sets could achieve higher accuracy.

scholarly journals Application of Supervised Machine Learning to Recognize Competent Level and Mixed Antinuclear Antibody Patterns Based on ICAP International Consensus

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 642
Author(s):  
Yi-Da Wu ◽  
Ruey-Kai Sheu ◽  
Chih-Wei Chung ◽  
Yen-Ching Wu ◽  
Chiao-Chi Ou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Excellent Agreement ◽  
Antinuclear Antibody ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Testing Data

Background: Antinuclear antibody pattern recognition is vital for autoimmune disease diagnosis but labor-intensive for manual interpretation. To develop an automated pattern recognition system, we established machine learning models based on the International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns (ICAP) at a competent level, mixed patterns recognition, and evaluated their consistency with human reading. Methods: 51,694 human epithelial cells (HEp-2) cell images with patterns assigned by experienced medical technologists collected in a medical center were used to train six machine learning algorithms and were compared by their performance. Next, we choose the best performing model to test the consistency with five experienced readers and two beginners. Results: The mean F1 score in each classification of the best performing model was 0.86 evaluated by Testing Data 1. For the inter-observer agreement test on Testing Data 2, the average agreement was 0.849 (?) among five experienced readers, 0.844 between the best performing model and experienced readers, 0.528 between experienced readers and beginners. The results indicate that the proposed model outperformed beginners and achieved an excellent agreement with experienced readers. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the developed model could reach an excellent agreement with experienced human readers using machine learning methods.

scholarly journals Redefining the Graph Edit Distance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesc Serratosa
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Triangle Inequality ◽  
Edit Distance ◽  
Minimum Amount ◽  
Graph Edit Distance ◽  
Edit Operation ◽  
Attributed Graphs ◽  
Distance Properties

AbstractGraph edit distance has been used since 1983 to compare objects in machine learning when these objects are represented by attributed graphs instead of vectors. In these cases, the graph edit distance is usually applied to deduce a distance between attributed graphs. This distance is defined as the minimum amount of edit operations (deletion, insertion and substitution of nodes and edges) needed to transform a graph into another. Since now, it has been stated that the distance properties have to be applied [(1) non-negativity (2) symmetry (3) identity and (4) triangle inequality] to the involved edit operations in the process of computing the graph edit distance to make the graph edit distance a metric. In this paper, we show that there is no need to impose the triangle inequality in each edit operation. This is an important finding since in pattern recognition applications, the classification ratio usually maximizes in the edit operation combinations (deletion, insertion and substitution of nodes and edges) that the triangle inequality is not fulfilled.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document