Variable Screening and Decolonization Protocols for Staphylococcus aureus Carriage Prior to Surgical Procedures

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 880-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Kline ◽  
Maya Highness ◽  
Loreen A. Herwaldt ◽  
Trish M. Perl
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Variable Screening ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology ◽  
Minnesota Hospital

We surveyed the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network, the Minnesota Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, and the Minnesota Hospital Association to assess presurgical Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization practices. The practices varied widely among responding facilities. The majority of respondents (63%) did not screen for S. aureus preoperatively.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(7):880–882

scholarly journals Effect of Chlorhexidine Bathing and Other Infection Control Practices on the Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown (BUGG) Trial: A Subgroup Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Morgan ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Michelle Shardell ◽  
Carol Sulis ◽  
Daniel H. Kett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Chlorhexidine Bathing

AbstractWe report the results of a subgroup analysis of the Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown trial. In 20 intensive care units, the reduction in acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus observed in this trial was observed in units also using chlorhexidine bathing and in those that previously performed active surveillance.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–4

scholarly journals The Use of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) in Healthcare Personnel (HCP): Guidance from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 981-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Talbot ◽  
Hilary Babcock ◽  
Deborah Cotton ◽  
Lisa L. Maragakis ◽  
Gregory A. Poland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

Because of the live viral backbone of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), questions have arisen regarding infection control precautions and restrictions surrounding its use in healthcare personnel (HCP). This document provides guidance from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America regarding use of LAIV in HCP and the infection control precautions that are recommended with its use in this population.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(10):981-983

Audit and Feedback Processes Among Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 704-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Livorsi ◽  
B. Heintz ◽  
J. T. Jacob ◽  
S. L. Krein ◽  
D. J. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Hospital Beds ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology ◽  
Optimal Implementation

Optimal implementation of audit-and-feedback is an important part of advancing antimicrobial stewardship programs. Our survey demonstrated variability in how 61 programs approach audit-and-feedback. The median (interquartile range) number of recommendations per week was 9 (5–19) per 100 hospital-beds. A major perceived barrier to more comprehensive stewardship was lack of resources.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:704–706

Variation in Definitions and Isolation Procedures for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marci Drees ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Anthony D. Harris ◽  
Daniel J. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Emerging Pathogens ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

Objective.To assess definitions, experience, and infection control practices for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), including Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas species, in acute care hospitals.Design.Cross-sectional survey.Participants.US and international members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network.Methods.Online survey that included definitions, infection control procedures, and microbiology capability related to MDR-GNB and other MDR bacteria.Results.From November 2012 through February 2013, 66 of 170 SHEA Research Network members responded (39% response rate), representing 26 states and 15 countries. More than 80% of facilities reported experience with each MDR-GNB isolate, and 78% had encountered GNB resistant to all antibiotics except colistin (62% Acinetobacter, 59% Pseudomonas, and 52% Enterobacteriaceae species). Participants varied regarding their definitions of “multidrug resistant,” with 14 unique definitions for Acinetobacter, 18 for Pseudomonas, and 22 for Enterobacteriaceae species. Substantial variation also existed in isolation practices. Although isolation was commonly used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), approximately 20% of facilities did not isolate for MDR Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter. The majority of those that isolated MDR organisms also removed isolation using a wide variety of criteria.Conclusion.Facilities vary significantly in their approach to preventing MDR-GNB transmission. Although practices for MRSA and VRE are relatively standardized, emerging pathogens CRE and other MDR-GNB have highly varied definitions and management. This confusion makes communication difficult, and varied use of isolation may contribute to emergence of these organisms. Public health agencies need to promote standard definitions and management to enable broader initiatives to limit emergence of MDR-GNB.

Political Versus Epidemiological Correctness

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 589-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry M. Farr
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Control Approach ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology ◽  
Active Detection

In the March issue of the journal, the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force indicates that the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) support the use of active detection and isolation (ADI) for controlling nosocomial infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) “in appropriate circumstances, as recommended in previously published guidelines”1(p250) (those published by SHEA and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee [HICPAC]), but that SHEA and APIC oppose the use of legislation for mandating any infection control approach, including this one as tried in 2006 in Illinois and Maryland. Both supporters and opponents of controlling MRSA and VRE with ADI probably will agree that legislation is not the optimal way to control nosocomial infections in general, but this position statement undoubtedly will please the latter more than it does the former because the SHEA/APIC Task Force argues that ADI is not ready for routine use throughout all healthcare facilities, directly opposing the position of the original SHEA guideline. As an author of that SHEA guideline, I would like to comment. First, the new position seems politically correct (since most infection control professionals have not yet bothered using ADI to control MRSA and VRE), but many of the planks of the SHEA/APIC Task Force position statement are misleading.

Use of Decolonization to Prevent Staphylococcal Infections in Various Healthcare Settings: Results of an Emerging Infections Network Survey

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1111-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Klizas West ◽  
Melissa S. Plantenga ◽  
Larry J. Strausbaugh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Nosocomial Transmission ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedures

Less than 20% of infectious diseases consultants work in hospitals that routinely employ decolonization therapy for individuals with staphylococcal carriage undergoing elective surgical procedures or for infection control efforts to limit nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). However, infectious diseases consultants frequently encounter patients with recurrent MRSA furunculosis and attempt to decolonize them.

Interfacility transfer communication of multidrug-resistant organism colonization or infection status: Practices and barriers in the acute-care setting

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Katherine D. Ellingson ◽  
Brie N. Noble ◽  
Genevieve L. Buser ◽  
Graham M. Snyder ◽  
Jessina C. McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Academic Affiliation ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

Abstract Objective: To describe interfacility transfer communication (IFTC) methods for notification of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) status in a diverse sample of acute-care hospitals. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Hospitals within the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN). Methods: SRN members completed an electronic survey on protocols and methods for IFTC. We assessed differences in IFTC frequency, barriers, and perceived benefit by presence of an IFTC protocol. Results: Among 136 hospital representatives who were sent the survey, 54 (40%) responded, of whom 72% reported having an IFTC protocol in place. The presence of a protocol did not differ significantly by hospital size, academic affiliation, or international status. Of those with IFTC protocols, 44% reported consistent notification of MDRO status (>75% of the time) to receiving facilities, as opposed to 13% from those with no IFTC protocol (P = .04). Respondents from hospitals with IFTC protocols reported significantly fewer barriers to communication compared to those without (2.8 vs 4.3; P = .03). Overall, however, most respondents (56%) reported a lack of standardization in communication. Presence of an IFTC protocol did not affect whether respondents perceived IFTC protocols as having a significant impact on infection prevention or antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusions: Most respondents reported having an IFTC protocol, which was associated with reduced communication barriers at transfer. Standardization of protocols and clarity about expectations for sending and receipt of information related to MDRO status may facilitate IFTC and promote appropriate and timely infection prevention practices.

scholarly journals Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Recovered from Healthcare- and Community-Associated Infections in Egypt

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdel-Maksoud ◽  
Mona El-Shokry ◽  
Ghada Ismail ◽  
Soad Hafez ◽  
Amani El-Kholy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Inducible Clindamycin Resistance ◽  
The Past ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Over Time

Background. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has created significant epidemiological, infection-control, and therapeutic management challenges during the past three decades. Aim. To analyze the pattern of resistance of healthcare- and community-associated MRSA in Egypt and the trend of resistance of HA-MRSA over time (2005–2013). Methods. MRSA isolates were recovered from healthcare-associated (HA) and community-associated (CA) Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections. They were tested against 11 antimicrobial discs and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined. Inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSB) was also screened using D-test. Findings. Of 631 S. aureus, MRSA was identified in 343 (76.6%) and 21 (11.5%) of HA and CA S. aureus isolates, respectively. The proportion of HA-MRSA increased significantly from 48.6% in 2005 to 86.8% in 2013 (p value < 0.001). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in 85.8% of HA-MRSA and 48.6% of CA-MRSA. Vancomycin intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA) was detected in 1.2% of HA-MRSA and none was detected in CA-MRSA. Among HA-MRSA strains, 5.3% showed iMLSB compared to 9.5% among CA-MRSA. Conclusion. The upsurge of the prevalence rates of HA-MRSA over time is alarming and urges for an effective infection control strategy and continuous monitoring of antimicrobial use.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus In Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College Hospital

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 673-677
Author(s):  
Abdullah Akhtar Ahmed ◽  
Shakhaowat Hossain ◽  
Babul Aktar ◽  
Nusrat Akhtar Juyee ◽  
SM Ali Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Throat Swab ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Medical College

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. To combat the challenge of life threatening MRSA remains a primary focus of most hospital infection control programs6. This study is undertaken in Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College Hospital to identify the MRSA for determination of its prevalence and is considered a component of an infection control program in many countries5.Methods: Three hundred seventy hospitalized patients of surgery and medicine departments were studied during 2015. Clinical information of the patients and their pus, wound swab, sputum, throat swab and CSF were cultured.Results: Out of 370 patients, pus and wound swab of 217 (59%) had wound infection, sputum and throat swab of 141 had respiratory tract infection (38%) and CSF of 12 (3.2%) had meningitis were aseptically collected and cultured. Staphylococcus aureus were isolated in 51% cases and out of them MRSA was identified in 72 (73%) cases. MRSA isolated in 50% cases of meningitis, 49% cases of respiratory tract infection and 29% cases of wound infection.Conclusion: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus appeared as a common cause of major illness and death and impose serious economic costs on patients and hospitals of our area like other developing countries. Detection of MRSA was associated with more severe clinical presentation.KYAMC Journal Vol. 7, No.-1, Jul 2016, Page 673-677

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document