Class Forces, Political Institutions, and State Intervention: Subnational Economic Development Policy in the United States, 1971–1990

2006 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1122-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Craig Jenkins ◽  
Kevin T. Leicht ◽  
Heather Wendt
1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Cox ◽  
Andrew Wood

The broad concern of this paper is the development of modes of cooperation in competitive contexts. The concrete vehicle for examining this is local economic development policy in the United States, in particular the projects of inward investment that have been its primary expression. This foregrounds the character of social organization as necessarily spatial organization: organization in this case for mediating inward investment. The paper shows how the socio-spatial contexts of agents result in problems of social integration and how they influence the particular forms of cooperative structure adopted in order to solve those problems.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
P B Meyer

Examinations and assessments of different countries' local economic development strategies have tended to overlook the very different rationales for such activity in diverse politicoeconomic cultures. Differences in the meanings ascribed to locality, to development, and to different programmatic partnerships—and in the divergent patterns of associated local actions—are studied by examining the metaphors used in the development policy literatures in Britain and the United States. The dominant UK metaphors are found to be control, coordination, and centralization, whereas those for the USA emerge as conflict, competition, and change. Enterprise Zones and Urban Development Corporations in the two countries are then examined for differences in practice, and it is concluded that differences in the societal and political meanings attributed to the two programs underscore the difficulties of cross-national transfer of development approaches.


1956 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carter Goodrich

The subject I should like to discuss grows directly out of the theme of the meetings as a whole. They have been concerned with the American West as an Underdeveloped Region, and the title was intended to suggest the analogy between the United States of an earlier period and the so-called underdeveloped nations of the present day. To many it would suggest a contrast in policy. These other nations are now in many cases striving to achieve economic development by national planning and deliberate measures of governmental policy. On the other hand the United States achieved its massive economic development without over-all economic planning, without five-year plans or explicit national targets of input and output, and—it is sometimes believed—without the adoption of policies deliberately intended to promote development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document