scholarly journals Peripheral S‐Phase T Cells in HIV Disease Have a Central Memory Phenotype and Rarely Have Evidence of Recent T Cell Receptor Engagement

2005 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott F. Sieg ◽  
Benigno Rodriguez ◽  
Robert Asaad ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Douglas A. Bazdar ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 193 (6) ◽  
pp. 879-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra Pahwa ◽  
Thomas W. McCloskey ◽  
Olga C. Aroniadis ◽  
Natasa Strbo ◽  
Subramaniam Krishnan ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 200 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rivino ◽  
Mara Messi ◽  
David Jarrossay ◽  
Antonio Lanzavecchia ◽  
Federica Sallusto ◽  
...  

We previously reported that central–memory T cells (TCM cells), which express lymph node homing receptors CCR7 and CD62L, are largely devoid of effector functions but acquire characteristics of effector–memory T cells (TEM cells) (i.e., CCR7− T helper [Th]1 or Th2 cells) after stimulation with T cell receptor agonists or homeostatic cytokines. Here we show that three chemokine receptors identify functional subsets within the human CD4+ TCM cell pool. TCM cells expressing CXCR3 secreted low amounts of interferon γ, whereas CCR4+ TCM cells produced some interleukin (IL)-4, but not IL-5. In response to IL-7 and IL-15, CXCR3+ TCM and CCR4+ TCM cells invariably generated fully differentiated CCR7− Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively, suggesting that they represent pre-Th1 and pre-Th2 cells. Conversely, CXCR5+ TCM cells lacking CXCR3 and CCR4 remained nonpolarized and retained CCR7 and CD62L expression upon cytokine-driven expansion. Unlike naive cells, all memory subsets had a low T cell receptor rearrangement excision circle content, spontaneously incorporated bromodeoxyuridine ex vivo, and contained cells specific for tetanus toxoid. Conversely, recall responses to cytomegalovirus and vaccinia virus were largely restricted to CXCR3+ TCM and TEM cells. We conclude that antigen-specific memory T cells are distributed between TEM cells and different subsets of TCM cells. Our results also explain how the quality of primary T cell responses could be maintained by TCM cells in the absence of antigen.


2006 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Jabbari ◽  
John T. Harty

The formation of memory CD8 T cells is an important goal of vaccination. However, although widespread use of booster immunizations in humans generates secondary and tertiary CD8 T cell memory, experimental data are limited to primary CD8 T cell memory. Here, we show that, compared with primary memory CD8 T cells, secondary memory CD8 T cells exhibit substantially delayed conversion to a central–memory phenotype, as determined by CD62L expression and interleukin (IL)-2 production. This delayed conversion to a central–memory phenotype correlates with reduced basal proliferation and responsiveness to IL-15, although in vitro coculture with a high concentration of IL-15 is capable of inducing proliferation and CD62L upregulation. Functionally, secondary memory CD8 T cells are more protective in vivo on a per cell basis, and this may be explained by sustained lytic ability. Additionally, secondary memory CD8 T cells are more permissive than primary memory CD8 T cells for new T cell priming in lymph nodes, possibly suggesting a mechanism of replacement for memory T cells. Thus, primary and secondary memory CD8 T cells are functionally distinct, and the number of encounters with antigen influences memory CD8 T cell function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document