Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk--Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle. Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus, Larry J. Shuman , Norman P. Hummon , Harvey WolfeThe Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Diane Vaughan

Isis ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-763
Author(s):  
Ronald Kline ◽  
William Lynch ◽  
Jameson Wetmore
Keyword(s):  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Risky Technology

From Challenger to Columbia

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichi Murata ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Civic Virtue ◽  
Typical Case ◽  
Alternative View ◽  
Space Shuttle Challenger ◽  
Broad Concept ◽  
Individual Actions ◽  
Insightful Analysis

One of the most important tasks of engineering ethics is to give engineers the tools required to act ethically to prevent possible disastrous accidents which could result from engineers’ decisions and actions. The space shuttle Challenger disaster is referred to as a typical case in almost every textbook. This case is seen as one from which engineers can learn important lessons, as it shows impressively how engineers should act as professionals, to prevent accidents. The Columbia disaster came seventeen years later in 2003. According to the report of the Columbia accident investigation board, the main cause of the accident was not individual actions which violated certain safety rules but rather was to be found in the history and culture of NASA. A culture is seen as one which desensitizedmanagers and engineers to potential hazards as they dealt with problems of uncertainty. This view of the disaster is based on Dian Vaughan’s analysis of the Challenger disaster, where inherent organizational factors and culture within NASA had been highlighted as contributing to the disaster. Based on the insightful analysis of the Columbia report and the work of Diane Vaughan, we search for an alternative view of engineering ethics. We focus on the inherent uncertainty of engineers’ work with respect to hazard precaution. We discuss claims that the concept of professional responsibility, which plays a central role in orthodox engineering ethics, is too narrow and that we need a broader and more fundamental concept of responsibility. Responsibility which should be attributed to every person related to an organization and therefore given the range of responsible persons, governments, managers, engineers, etc. might be called “civic virtue”. Only on the basis of this broad concept of responsibility of civic virtue, we can find a possible way to prevent disasters and reduce the hazards that seem to be inseparable part of the use of complex technological systems.

scholarly journals NASA Flight Planning Branch Space Shuttle Lessons Learned

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Clevenger ◽  
Fisher Reynolds ◽  
Gregory Whitney ◽  
Mark Blanton ◽  
Douglas Bristol
Keyword(s):  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Flight Planning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document