Feminist Methods in Social Research.Shulamit Reinharz , Lynn Davidman

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-914
Author(s):  
Laurel Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Methods

Feminist Methods in Social Research.

Social Forces ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1636
Author(s):  
Terry Arendell ◽  
Shulamit Reinharz
Keyword(s):  
Social Research ◽  
Feminist Methods

scholarly journals Feminist Methods and Sources in Criminology and Criminal Justice

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Howe
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Advanced Education ◽  
Justice Research ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
The Social ◽  
Feminist Methods ◽  
Criminal Justice Research ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Criminology And Criminal Justice

AbstractThis article by Adrian Howe is based on a presentation given at the ‘Sources and Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice Conference’ in November 2015, jointly sponsored by the Institute of Advanced Education and the Socio-Legal Studies Association. She begins by querying whether there are indeed distinct feminist methods in the social sciences. She outlines the impact of what she calls the ‘methodical revolution’ on the criminology discipline, Foucault's contribution and Foucauldian methodologies deployed in criminological and criminal justice research.

Researching Trafficked Women

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 769-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Bosworth ◽  
Carolyn Hoyle ◽  
Michelle Madden Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Exploitation ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Research Participants ◽  
Building Trust ◽  
Feminist Methods ◽  
Trafficking Victims ◽  
Definition Of

This article exposes methodological barriers we encountered in a small research project on women trafficked for the purpose of sexual exploitation and our attempts, drawing on feminist and emergent methods, to resolve them. It critically assesses the role of institutional gatekeepers and the practical challenges faced in obtaining data directly from trafficking victims. Such difficulties, it suggests, spring at least in part from lingering disagreements within the feminist academic, legal, and advocacy communities regarding the nature, extent, and definition of trafficking. They also reveal concerns from policy makers and practitioners over the relevance and utility of academic research. Although feminist researchers have focused on building trust with vulnerable research participants, there has been far less discussion about how to persuade institutional elites to cooperate. Our experiences in this project, we suggest, reveal limitations in the emphasis on reflexivity in feminist methods, and point to the need for more strategic engagement with policy makers about the utility of academic research in general.

"Can I study you?" Cross-disciplinary conversations in queer Internet studies

First Monday ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Marzullo ◽  
Jasmine Rault ◽  
T. L. Cowan
Keyword(s):  
Research Ethics ◽  
Performance Studies ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Internet Studies ◽  
Research Environments ◽  
Gut Feelings ◽  
Feminist Methods ◽  
Research Situation ◽  
Digital Research

We first met around a workshop table at the queer Internet studies (QIS2) in Philadelphia in February 2017. This conversation began when we realized that we all had some disciplinary knowledges, training and practice that can bear upon queer Internet studies, but simultaneously we felt unprepared for the methodological-ethical challenges posed by the Internet as a queer research environment. Michelle was trained in ethnography as an anthropologist and Jasmine and TL were trained in humanities perspectives — mostly through literature, performance studies and art history, though about five years ago they had begun to retrain in the fields of online archives, pedagogies and networks, which has led to a new collaborative research project on digital research ethics. We had all been trained in dyke/queer/feminist methods and critical theory, and continue to work in this area. And we all were experiencing some gut feelings about the need for better understandings of disciplinary practices — what we are doing, how do we apply what we know how to do, and why are we doing it — across disciplines as we enter the Internet as researchers, in a research situation. What follows is a conversation the three of us had over email and videoconference between July–October 2017, which revolved around the question of what ethnographic methods can bring to Internet research, and what might queer and feminist research ethics look like in the context of digital research environments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document