scholarly journals DNA replication in Physarum polycephalum: electron microscopic analysis of patterns of DNA replication in the presence of cycloheximide.

1982 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Haugli ◽  
R Andreassen ◽  
S Funderud
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Physarum Polycephalum ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Replication Fork Progression

DNA from synchronously replicating nuclei of Physarum polycephalum was studied electron microscopically after 15, 30, 60, and 90 or 120 min of replication in the presence or absence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. The replication-loop size-distribution showed that replication fork progression is severely retarded in the presence of cycloheximide. Analysis of replication-loop frequency showed a similar pattern in control and cyclo-heximide-treated samples, with an increase from 15 to 30 and 60 min. This suggests, surprisingly, that initiations of new replicons either may not be inhibited by cycloheximide or, alternatively, that all initiations have already taken place at the very start of S-phase. The latter conclusion is favored in the light of previous results in our laboratory, discussed here.

scholarly journals LIMITED DNA SYNTHESIS IN THE ABSENCE OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN PHYSARUM POLYCEPHALUM

1966 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Cummins ◽  
H. P. Rusch
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Physarum Polycephalum ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Removal Experiments ◽  
Inhibitor Of Protein Synthesis

Actidione (cycloheximide), an antibiotic inhibitor of protein synthesis, blocked the incorporation of leucine and lysine during the S phase of Physarum polycephalum. Actidione added during the early prophase period in which mitosis is blocked totally inhibited the initiation of DNA synthesis. Actidione treatment in late prophase, which permitted mitosis in the absence of protein synthesis, permitted initiation of a round of DNA replication making up between 20 and 30% of the unreplicated nuclear DNA. Actidione treatment during the S phase permitted a round of replication similar to the effect at the beginning of S. The DNA synthesized in the presence of actidione was replicated semiconservatively and was stable through at least the mitosis following antibiotic removal. Experiments in which fluorodeoxyuridine inhibition was followed by thymidine reversal in the presence of actidione suggest that the early rounds of DNA replication must be completed before later rounds are initiated.

scholarly journals Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 maintain S-phase chromatin and DNA replication fork progression

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Srividya Bhaskara ◽  
Vincent Jacques ◽  
James R Rusche ◽  
Eric N Olson ◽  
Bradley R Cairns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Fork Progression

scholarly journals Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 443 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Eva Petermann
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Damage Response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.

scholarly journals Grapes(Chk1) prevents nuclear CDK1 activation by delaying cyclin B nuclear accumulation

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Royou ◽  
Derek McCusker ◽  
Douglas R. Kellogg ◽  
William Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Kinase 1 ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown

Entry into mitosis is characterized by a dramatic remodeling of nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. These changes are driven by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) activity, yet how cytoplasmic and nuclear CDK1 activities are coordinated is unclear. We injected cyclin B (CycB) into Drosophila melanogaster embryos during interphase of syncytial cycles and monitored effects on cytoplasmic and nuclear mitotic events. In untreated embryos or embryos arrested in interphase with a protein synthesis inhibitor, injection of CycB accelerates nuclear envelope breakdown and mitotic remodeling of the cytoskeleton. Upon activation of the Grapes(checkpoint kinase 1) (Grp(Chk1))-dependent S-phase checkpoint, increased levels of CycB drives cytoplasmic but not nuclear mitotic events. Grp(Chk1) prevents nuclear CDK1 activation by delaying CycB nuclear accumulation through Wee1-dependent and independent mechanisms.

scholarly journals The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Frei ◽  
Susan M. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

We have examined the cellular function of Sgs1p, a nonessential yeast DNA helicase, homologs of which are implicated in two highly debilitating hereditary human diseases (Werner's and Bloom's syndromes). We show that Sgs1p is an integral component of the S-phase checkpoint response in yeast, which arrests cells due to DNA damage or blocked fork progression during DNA replication. DNA polε and Sgs1p are found in the same epistasis group and act upstream of Rad53p to signal cell cycle arrest when DNA replication is perturbed. Sgs1p is tightly regulated through the cell cycle, accumulates in S phase and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci, even in the absence of fork arrest. The association of Rad53p with a chromatin subfraction is Sgs1p dependent, suggesting an important role for the helicase in the signal-transducing pathway that monitors replication fork progression.

Regulation of human histone gene expression during the HeLa cell cycle requires protein synthesis

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 2723-2734
Author(s):  
H L Sive ◽  
N Heintz ◽  
R G Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone Gene ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Histone Gene Expression

We have examined the effects of protein synthesis inhibition on histone gene expression during the HeLa cell cycle. Histone mRNAs, which normally are rapidly degraded in the absence of DNA synthesis, persist and increase in concentration when translation is inhibited before DNA replication is halted. This is not a function of polysomal shielding of these mRNAs from active degradation mechanisms since inhibitors of translation initiation alone effect stabilization and induction. The superinduction of histone mRNAs by protein synthesis inhibition is effective at the G1/S border, and in the S-phase and non-S-phase periods of the cell cycle. However, the relative increase in histone mRNA is greater when cells not synthesizing DNA are treated with a protein synthesis inhibitor than when S-phase cells are so treated. Non-histone mRNAs examined are not superinduced by translation inhibition. Transcription rates from both histone and non-histone genes increase after protein synthesis inhibition. Although the decrease in histone gene transcription associated with DNA synthesis inhibition is prevented and reversed by protein synthesis inhibition, we have no evidence that histone gene-specific transcriptional regulation is dependent on protein synthesis. Transcriptional increases may contribute to the superinduction effect but cannot explain its differential extent during the cell cycle, since these increases are similar when replicating or nonreplicating cells are treated with a protein synthesis inhibitor. We believe that changes in histone mRNA stability can account for much of the differential superinduction effect. Our results indicate a requirement for continuing protein synthesis in the cell cycle regulation of histone mRNAs.

scholarly journals Concerted activities of Mcm4, Sld3 and Dbf4 in control of origin activation and DNA replication fork progression

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Jun Sheu ◽  
Justin B Kinney ◽  
Bruce Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Regulatory Domain ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Late Origin

Eukaryotic chromosomes initiate DNA synthesis from multiple replication origins in a temporally specific manner during S phase. The replicative helicase Mcm2-7 functions in both initiation and fork progression and thus is an important target of regulation. Mcm4, a helicase subunit, possesses an unstructured regulatory domain that mediates control from multiple kinase signaling pathways, including the Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase (DDK). Following replication stress in S phase, Dbf4 and Sld3, an initiation factor and essential target of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK), are targets of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 for inhibition of initiation from origins that have yet to be activated, so-called late origins. Here, whole genome DNA replication profile analysis is employed to access under various conditions the effect of mutations that alter the Mcm4 helicase regulatory domain and the Rad53 targets, Sld3 and Dbf4. Late origin firing occurs under genotoxic stress when the controls on Mcm4, Sld3 and Dbf4 are simultaneously eliminated. The regulatory domain of Mcm4 plays an important role in the timing of late origin firing, both in an unperturbed S phase and dNTP limitation. Furthermore, checkpoint control of Sld3 impacts fork progression under replication stress. This effect is parallel to the role of the Mcm4 regulatory domain in monitoring fork progression. Hypomorph mutations in sld3 are suppressed by a mcm4 regulatory domain mutation. Thus, in response cellular conditions, the functions executed by Sld3, Dbf4 and the regulatory domain of Mcm4 intersect to control origin firing and replication fork progression, thereby ensuring genome stability.

scholarly journals A Dual-Specificity Phosphatase Cdc25B Is an Unstable Protein and Triggers p34cdc2/Cyclin B Activation in Hamster BHK21 Cells Arrested with Hydroxyurea

1997 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 1105-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Nishijima ◽  
Hideo Nishitani ◽  
Takashi Seki ◽  
Takeharu Nishimoto
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Dual Specificity ◽  
Dual Specificity Phosphatases ◽  
Initial Activation

By incubating at 30°C in the presence of an energy source, p34cdc2/cyclin B was activated in the extract prepared from a temperature-sensitive mutant, tsBN2, which prematurely enters mitosis at 40°C, the nonpermissive temperature (Nishimoto, T., E. Eilen, and C. Basilico. 1978. Cell. 15:475–483), and wild-type cells of the hamster BHK21 cell line arrested in S phase, without protein synthesis. Such an in vitro activation of p34cdc2/cyclin B, however, did not occur in the extract prepared from cells pretreated with protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, although this extract still retained the ability to inhibit p34cdc2/cyclin B activation. When tsBN2 cells arrested in S phase were incubated at 40°C in the presence of cycloheximide, Cdc25B, but not Cdc25A and C, among a family of dual-specificity phosphatases, Cdc25, was lost coincidentally with the lack of the activation of p34cdc2/cyclin B. Consistently, the immunodepletion of Cdc25B from the extract inhibited the activation of p34cdc2/cyclin B. Cdc25B was found to be unstable (half-life < 30 min). Cdc25B, but not Cdc25C, immunoprecipitated from the extract directly activated the p34cdc2/cyclin B of cycloheximide-treated cells as well as that of nontreated cells, although Cdc25C immunoprecipitated from the extract of mitotic cells activated the p34cdc2/cyclin B within the extract of cycloheximide-treated cells. Our data suggest that Cdc25B made an initial activation of p34cdc2/cyclin B, which initiates mitosis through the activation of Cdc25C.

scholarly journals Regulation of human histone gene expression during the HeLa cell cycle requires protein synthesis.

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 2723-2734 ◽  
Author(s):  
H L Sive ◽  
N Heintz ◽  
R G Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone Gene ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Histone Gene Expression

We have examined the effects of protein synthesis inhibition on histone gene expression during the HeLa cell cycle. Histone mRNAs, which normally are rapidly degraded in the absence of DNA synthesis, persist and increase in concentration when translation is inhibited before DNA replication is halted. This is not a function of polysomal shielding of these mRNAs from active degradation mechanisms since inhibitors of translation initiation alone effect stabilization and induction. The superinduction of histone mRNAs by protein synthesis inhibition is effective at the G1/S border, and in the S-phase and non-S-phase periods of the cell cycle. However, the relative increase in histone mRNA is greater when cells not synthesizing DNA are treated with a protein synthesis inhibitor than when S-phase cells are so treated. Non-histone mRNAs examined are not superinduced by translation inhibition. Transcription rates from both histone and non-histone genes increase after protein synthesis inhibition. Although the decrease in histone gene transcription associated with DNA synthesis inhibition is prevented and reversed by protein synthesis inhibition, we have no evidence that histone gene-specific transcriptional regulation is dependent on protein synthesis. Transcriptional increases may contribute to the superinduction effect but cannot explain its differential extent during the cell cycle, since these increases are similar when replicating or nonreplicating cells are treated with a protein synthesis inhibitor. We believe that changes in histone mRNA stability can account for much of the differential superinduction effect. Our results indicate a requirement for continuing protein synthesis in the cell cycle regulation of histone mRNAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document