scholarly journals The aurora kinase AIR-2 functions in the release of chromosome cohesion in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Rogers ◽  
John D. Bishop ◽  
James A. Waddle ◽  
Jill M. Schumacher ◽  
Rueyling Lin
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Localization Pattern ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Separation ◽  
Major Amino Acid

Accurate chromosome segregation during cell division requires not only the establishment, but also the precise, regulated release of chromosome cohesion. Chromosome dynamics during meiosis are more complicated, because homologues separate at anaphase I whereas sister chromatids remain attached until anaphase II. How the selective release of chromosome cohesion is regulated during meiosis remains unclear. We show that the aurora-B kinase AIR-2 regulates the selective release of chromosome cohesion during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. AIR-2 localizes to subchromosomal regions corresponding to last points of contact between homologues in metaphase I and between sister chromatids in metaphase II. Depletion of AIR-2 by RNA interference (RNAi) prevents chromosome separation at both anaphases, with concomitant prevention of meiotic cohesin REC-8 release from meiotic chromosomes. We show that AIR-2 phosphorylates REC-8 at a major amino acid in vitro. Interestingly, depletion of two PP1 phosphatases, CeGLC-7α and CeGLC-7β, abolishes the restricted localization pattern of AIR-2. In Ceglc-7α/β(RNAi) embryos, AIR-2 is detected on the entire bivalent. Concurrently, chromosomal REC-8 is dramatically reduced and sister chromatids are separated precociously at anaphase I in Ceglc-7α/β(RNAi) embryos. We propose that AIR-2 promotes the release of chromosome cohesion via phosphorylation of REC-8 at specific chromosomal locations and that CeGLC-7α/β, directly or indirectly, antagonize AIR-2 activity.

scholarly journals CSC-1

2003 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Romano ◽  
Annika Guse ◽  
Ivica Krascenicova ◽  
Heinke Schnabel ◽  
Ralf Schnabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Genetic Analysis ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
The Individual

The Aurora B kinase complex is a critical regulator of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. In Caenorhabditis elegans, AIR-2 (Aurora B) function requires ICP-1 (Incenp) and BIR-1 (Survivin). In various systems, Aurora B binds to orthologues of these proteins. Through genetic analysis, we have identified a new subunit of the Aurora B kinase complex, CSC-1. C. elegans embryos depleted of CSC-1, AIR-2, ICP-1, or BIR-1 have identical phenotypes. CSC-1, BIR-1, and ICP-1 are interdependent for their localization, and all are required for AIR-2 localization. In vitro, CSC-1 binds directly to BIR-1. The CSC-1/BIR-1 complex, but not the individual subunits, associates with ICP-1. CSC-1 associates with ICP-1, BIR-1, and AIR-2 in vivo. ICP-1 dramatically stimulates AIR-2 kinase activity. This activity is not stimulated by CSC-1/BIR-1, suggesting that these two subunits function as targeting subunits for AIR-2 kinase.

scholarly journals RMD-1, a novel microtubule-associated protein, functions in chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumiko Oishi ◽  
Hideyuki Okano ◽  
Hitoshi Sawa
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Microtubule Growth ◽  
Mild Defect

For proper chromosome segregation, the sister kinetochores must attach to microtubules extending from the opposite spindle poles. Any errors in microtubule attachment can induce aneuploidy. In this study, we identify a novel conserved Caenorhabditis elegans microtubule-associated protein, regulator of microtubule dynamics 1 (RMD-1), that localizes to spindle microtubules and spindle poles. Depletion of RMD-1 induces severe defects in chromosome segregation, probably through merotelic attachments between microtubules and chromosomes. Although rmd-1 embryos also have a mild defect in microtubule growth, we find that mutants of the microtubule growth regulator XMAP215/ZYG-9 show much weaker segregation defects. This suggests that the microtubule growth defect in rmd-1 embryos does not cause abnormal chromosome segregation. We also see that RMD-1 interacts with aurora B in vitro. Our results suggest that RMD-1 functions in chromosome segregation in C. elegans embryos, possibly through the aurora B–mediated pathway. Human homologues of RMD-1 could also bind microtubules, which would suggest a function for these proteins in chromosome segregation during mitosis in other organisms as well.

scholarly journals Aurora B Overexpression Causes Aneuploidy and p21Cip1Repression during Tumor Development

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (20) ◽  
pp. 3566-3578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra González-Loyola ◽  
Gonzalo Fernández-Miranda ◽  
Marianna Trakala ◽  
David Partida ◽  
Kumiko Samejima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora Kinase B

Aurora kinase B, one of the three members of the mammalian Aurora kinase family, is the catalytic component of the chromosomal passenger complex, an essential regulator of chromosome segregation in mitosis. Aurora B is overexpressed in human tumors although whether this kinase may function as an oncogenein vivois not established. Here, we report a new mouse model in which expression of the endogenousAurkblocus can be inducedin vitroandin vivo. Overexpression of Aurora B in cultured cells induces defective chromosome segregation and aneuploidy. Long-term overexpression of Aurora Bin vivoresults in aneuploidy and the development of multiple spontaneous tumors in adult mice, including a high incidence of lymphomas. Overexpression of Aurora B also results in a reduced DNA damage response and decreased levels of the p53 target p21Cip1in vitroandin vivo, in line with an inverse correlation between Aurora B and p21Cip1expression in human leukemias. Thus, overexpression of Aurora B may contribute to tumor formation not only by inducing chromosomal instability but also by suppressing the function of the cell cycle inhibitor p21Cip1.

scholarly journals Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1473-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Storchová ◽  
Justin S. Becker ◽  
Nicolas Talarek ◽  
Sandra Kögelsberger ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The conserved mitotic kinase Bub1 performs multiple functions that are only partially characterized. Besides its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosome alignment, Bub1 is crucial for the kinetochore recruitment of multiple proteins, among them Sgo1. Both Bub1 and Sgo1 are dispensable for growth of haploid and diploid budding yeast, but they become essential in cells with higher ploidy. We find that overexpression of SGO1 partially corrects the chromosome segregation defect of bub1Δ haploid cells and restores viability to bub1Δ tetraploid cells. Using an unbiased high-copy suppressor screen, we identified two members of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), BIR1 (survivin) and SLI15 (INCENP, inner centromere protein), as suppressors of the growth defect of both bub1Δ and sgo1Δ tetraploids, suggesting that these mutants die due to defects in chromosome biorientation. Overexpression of BIR1 or SLI15 also complements the benomyl sensitivity of haploid bub1Δ and sgo1Δ cells. Mutants lacking SGO1 fail to biorient sister chromatids attached to the same spindle pole (syntelic attachment) after nocodazole treatment. Moreover, the sgo1Δ cells accumulate syntelic attachments in unperturbed mitoses, a defect that is partially corrected by BIR1 or SLI15 overexpression. We show that in budding yeast neither Bub1 nor Sgo1 is required for CPC localization or affects Aurora B activity. Instead we identify Sgo1 as a possible partner of Mps1, a mitotic kinase suggested to have an Aurora B–independent function in establishment of biorientation. We found that Sgo1 overexpression rescues defects caused by metaphase inactivation of Mps1 and that Mps1 is required for Sgo1 localization to the kinetochore. We propose that Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 facilitate chromosome biorientation independently of the Aurora B–mediated pathway at the budding yeast kinetochore and that both pathways are required for the efficient turnover of syntelic attachments.

scholarly journals A single amino acid change converts Aurora-A into Aurora-B-like kinase in terms of partner specificity and cellular function

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (17) ◽  
pp. 6939-6944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyan Fu ◽  
Minglei Bian ◽  
Junjun Liu ◽  
Qing Jiang ◽  
Chuanmao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Single Amino Acid Residue ◽  
Single Amino Acid Change ◽  
Equivalent Residue ◽  
And Function

Aurora kinase-A and -B are key regulators of the cell cycle and tumorigenesis. It has remained a mystery why these 2 Aurora kinases, although highly similar in protein sequence and structure, are distinct in subcellular localization and function. Here, we report the striking finding that a single amino acid residue is responsible for these differences. We replaced the Gly-198 of Aurora-A with the equivalent residue Asn-142 of Aurora-B and found that in HeLa cells, Aurora-AG198N was recruited to the inner centromere in metaphase and the midzone in anaphase, reminiscent of the Aurora-B localization. Moreover, Aurora-AG198N compensated for the loss of Aurora-B in chromosome misalignment and cell premature exit from mitosis. Furthermore, Aurora-AG198N formed a complex with the Aurora-B partners, INCENP and Survivin, and its localization depended on this interaction. Aurora-AG198N phosphorylated the Aurora-B substrates INCENP and Survivin in vitro. Therefore, we propose that the presence of Gly or Asn at a single site assigns Aurora-A and -B to their respective partners and thus to their distinctive subcellular localizations and functions.

scholarly journals PP2A-B56 opposes Mps1 phosphorylation of Knl1 and thereby promotes spindle assembly checkpoint silencing

2014 ◽  
Vol 206 (7) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Espert ◽  
Pelin Uluocak ◽  
Ricardo Nunes Bastos ◽  
Davinderpreet Mangat ◽  
Philipp Graab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Safeguard Mechanism

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors correct attachment of chromosomes to microtubules, an important safeguard mechanism ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. How the SAC signal is turned off once all the chromosomes have successfully attached to the spindle remains an unresolved question. Mps1 phosphorylation of Knl1 results in recruitment of the SAC proteins Bub1, Bub3, and BubR1 to the kinetochore and production of the wait-anaphase signal. SAC silencing is therefore expected to involve a phosphatase opposing Mps1. Here we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that BubR1-associated PP2A-B56 is a key phosphatase for the removal of the Mps1-mediated Knl1 phosphorylations necessary for Bub1/BubR1 recruitment in mammalian cells. SAC silencing is thus promoted by a negative feedback loop involving the Mps1-dependent recruitment of a phosphatase opposing Mps1. Our findings extend the previously reported role for BubR1-associated PP2A-B56 in opposing Aurora B and suggest that BubR1-bound PP2A-B56 integrates kinetochore surveillance and silencing of the SAC.

scholarly journals Meiotic Cohesion Requires Accumulation of ORD on Chromosomes before Condensation

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 3890-3900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Balicky ◽  
Matthew W. Endres ◽  
Cary Lai ◽  
Sharon E. Bickel
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Chromatin Compaction ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Meiotic Nondisjunction ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis

Cohesion between sister chromatids is a prerequisite for accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. To allow chromosome condensation during prophase, the connections that hold sister chromatids together must be maintained but still permit extensive chromatin compaction. In Drosophila, null mutations in the orientation disruptor (ord) gene lead to meiotic nondisjunction in males and females because cohesion is absent by the time that sister kinetochores make stable microtubule attachments. We provide evidence that ORD is concentrated within the extrachromosomal domains of the nuclei ofDrosophila primary spermatocytes during early G2, but accumulates on the meiotic chromosomes by mid to late G2. Moreover, using fluorescence in situ hybridization to monitor cohesion directly, we show that cohesion defects first become detectable inord null spermatocytes shortly after the time when wild-type ORD associates with the chromosomes. After condensation, ORD remains bound at the centromeres of wild-type spermatocytes and persists there until centromeric cohesion is released during anaphase II. Our results suggest that association of ORD with meiotic chromosomes during mid to late G2 is required to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion during prophase condensation and that retention of ORD at the centromeres after condensation ensures the maintenance of centromeric cohesion until anaphase II.

scholarly journals Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Misuzu Wakiya ◽  
Eriko Nishi ◽  
Shinnosuke Kawai ◽  
Kohei Yamada ◽  
Kazuhiro Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Oriented Attachment ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Meiosis I

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

scholarly journals Topological in vitro loading of the budding yeast cohesin ring onto DNA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. e201800143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Minamino ◽  
Torahiko L Higashi ◽  
Céline Bouchoux ◽  
Frank Uhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Organization ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Reaction Step ◽  
Subsequent Reaction ◽  
Transition State Analog ◽  
Sister Chromatids

The ring-shaped chromosomal cohesin complex holds sister chromatids together by topological embrace, a prerequisite for accurate chromosome segregation. Cohesin plays additional roles in genome organization, transcriptional regulation, and DNA repair. The cohesin ring includes an ABC family ATPase, but the molecular mechanism by which the ATPase contributes to cohesin function is not yet understood. In this study, we have purified budding yeast cohesin, as well as its Scc2–Scc4 cohesin loader complex, and biochemically reconstituted ATP-dependent topological cohesin loading onto DNA. Our results reproduce previous observations obtained using fission yeast cohesin, thereby establishing conserved aspects of cohesin behavior. Unexpectedly, we find that nonhydrolyzable ATP ground state mimetics ADP·BeF2, ADP·BeF3−, and ADP·AlFx, but not a hydrolysis transition state analog ADP·VO43−, support cohesin loading. The energy from nucleotide binding is sufficient to drive the DNA entry reaction into the cohesin ring. ATP hydrolysis, believed to be essential for in vivo cohesin loading, must serve a subsequent reaction step. These results provide molecular insights into cohesin function and open new experimental opportunities that the budding yeast model affords.

scholarly journals The Ndc80 complex bridges two Dam1 complex rings

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae ook Kim ◽  
Alex Zelter ◽  
Neil T Umbreit ◽  
Athena Bollozos ◽  
Michael Riffle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Ndc80 Complex ◽  
Interaction Regions ◽  
Dam1 Complex

Strong kinetochore-microtubule attachments are essential for faithful segregation of sister chromatids during mitosis. The Dam1 and Ndc80 complexes are the main microtubule binding components of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore. Cooperation between these two complexes enhances kinetochore-microtubule coupling and is regulated by Aurora B kinase. We show that the Ndc80 complex can simultaneously bind and bridge across two Dam1 complex rings through a tripartite interaction, each component of which is regulated by Aurora B kinase. Mutations in any one of the Ndc80p interaction regions abrogates the Ndc80 complex’s ability to bind two Dam1 rings in vitro, and results in kinetochore biorientation and microtubule attachment defects in vivo. We also show that an extra-long Ndc80 complex, engineered to space the two Dam1 rings further apart, does not support growth. Taken together, our work suggests that each kinetochore in vivo contains two Dam1 rings and that proper spacing between the rings is vital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document