scholarly journals Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Misuzu Wakiya ◽  
Eriko Nishi ◽  
Shinnosuke Kawai ◽  
Kohei Yamada ◽  
Kazuhiro Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Oriented Attachment ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Meiosis I

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

scholarly journals Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting association of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 4486-4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Buttrick ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Theresa C. Lancaster ◽  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
Lindsey A. Shepperd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Catalytic Subunits ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Anaphase B ◽  
Novel Protein

Type 1 phosphatase (PP1) antagonizes Aurora B kinase to stabilize kinetochore–microtubule attachments and to silence the spindle checkpoint. We screened for factors that exacerbate the growth defect of Δdis2 cells, which lack one of two catalytic subunits of PP1 in fission yeast, and identified Nsk1, a novel protein required for accurate chromosome segregation. During interphase, Nsk1 resides in the nucleolus but spreads throughout the nucleoplasm as cells enter mitosis. Following dephosphorylation by Clp1 (Cdc14-like) phosphatase and at least one other phosphatase, Nsk1 localizes to the interface between kinetochores and the inner face of the spindle pole body during anaphase. In the absence of Nsk1, some kinetochores become detached from spindle poles during anaphase B. If this occurs late in anaphase B, then the sister chromatids of unclustered kinetochores segregate to the correct daughter cell. These unclustered kinetochores are efficiently captured, retrieved, bioriented, and segregated during the following mitosis, as long as Dis2 is present. However, if kinetochores are detached from a spindle pole early in anaphase B, then these sister chromatids become missegregated. These data suggest Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting the tethering of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B.

scholarly journals Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1473-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Storchová ◽  
Justin S. Becker ◽  
Nicolas Talarek ◽  
Sandra Kögelsberger ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The conserved mitotic kinase Bub1 performs multiple functions that are only partially characterized. Besides its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosome alignment, Bub1 is crucial for the kinetochore recruitment of multiple proteins, among them Sgo1. Both Bub1 and Sgo1 are dispensable for growth of haploid and diploid budding yeast, but they become essential in cells with higher ploidy. We find that overexpression of SGO1 partially corrects the chromosome segregation defect of bub1Δ haploid cells and restores viability to bub1Δ tetraploid cells. Using an unbiased high-copy suppressor screen, we identified two members of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), BIR1 (survivin) and SLI15 (INCENP, inner centromere protein), as suppressors of the growth defect of both bub1Δ and sgo1Δ tetraploids, suggesting that these mutants die due to defects in chromosome biorientation. Overexpression of BIR1 or SLI15 also complements the benomyl sensitivity of haploid bub1Δ and sgo1Δ cells. Mutants lacking SGO1 fail to biorient sister chromatids attached to the same spindle pole (syntelic attachment) after nocodazole treatment. Moreover, the sgo1Δ cells accumulate syntelic attachments in unperturbed mitoses, a defect that is partially corrected by BIR1 or SLI15 overexpression. We show that in budding yeast neither Bub1 nor Sgo1 is required for CPC localization or affects Aurora B activity. Instead we identify Sgo1 as a possible partner of Mps1, a mitotic kinase suggested to have an Aurora B–independent function in establishment of biorientation. We found that Sgo1 overexpression rescues defects caused by metaphase inactivation of Mps1 and that Mps1 is required for Sgo1 localization to the kinetochore. We propose that Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 facilitate chromosome biorientation independently of the Aurora B–mediated pathway at the budding yeast kinetochore and that both pathways are required for the efficient turnover of syntelic attachments.

scholarly journals Shugoshin Promotes Sister Kinetochore Biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1199-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan M. Kiburz ◽  
Angelika Amon ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Meiosis I

Chromosome segregation must be executed accurately during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Sgo1 plays a key role in ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in at least two ways. During meiosis this protein regulates the removal of cohesins, the proteins that hold sister chromatids together, from chromosomes. During mitosis, Sgo1 is required for sensing the absence of tension caused by sister kinetochores not being attached to microtubules emanating from opposite poles. Here we describe a differential requirement for Sgo1 in the segregation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids. Sgo1 plays only a minor role in segregating homologous chromosomes at meiosis I. In contrast, Sgo1 is important to bias sister kinetochores toward biorientation. We suggest that Sgo1 acts at sister kinetochores to promote their biorientation.

scholarly journals Bipolar spindle attachments affect redistributions of ZW10, a Drosophila centromere/kinetochore component required for accurate chromosome segregation.

1996 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 1127-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
B C Williams ◽  
M Gatti ◽  
M L Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Male Meiosis ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Separation ◽  
Meiosis I

Previous efforts have shown that mutations in the Drosophila ZW10 gene cause massive chromosome missegregation during mitotic divisions in several tissues. Here we demonstrate that mutations in ZW10 also disrupt chromosome behavior in male meiosis I and meiosis II, indicating that ZW10 function is common to both equational and reductional divisions. Divisions are apparently normal before anaphase onset, but ZW10 mutants exhibit lagging chromosomes and irregular chromosome segregation at anaphase. Chromosome missegregation during meiosis I of these mutants is not caused by precocious separation of sister chromatids, but rather the nondisjunction of homologs. ZW10 is first visible during prometaphase, where it localizes to the kinetochores of the bivalent chromosomes (during meiosis I) or to the sister kinetochores of dyads (during meiosis II). During metaphase of both divisions, ZW10 appears to move from the kinetochores and to spread toward the poles along what appear to be kinetochore microtubules. Redistributions of ZW10 at metaphase require bipolar attachments of individual chromosomes or paired bivalents to the spindle. At the onset of anaphase I or anaphase II, ZW10 rapidly relocalizes to the kinetochore regions of the separating chromosomes. In other mutant backgrounds in which chromosomes lag during anaphase, the presence or absence of ZW10 at a particular kinetochore predicts whether or not the chromosome moves appropriately to the spindle poles. We propose that ZW10 acts as part of, or immediately downstream of, a tension-sensing mechanism that regulates chromosome separation or movement at anaphase onset.

scholarly journals Aurora B/C-dependent phosphorylation promotes Rec8 cleavage in mammalian oocytes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Nikalayevich ◽  
Safia El Jailani ◽  
Damien Cladiere ◽  
Yulia Gryaznova ◽  
Celia Fosse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Centromere Region ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Turn Over ◽  
Meiosis I

To generate haploid gametes, cohesin is removed in a stepwise manner from chromosome arms in meiosis I and the centromere region in meiosis II, to segregate chromosomes and sister chromatids, respectively. Meiotic cohesin removal requires cleavage of the meiosis-specific kleisin subunit Rec8 by the protease Separase[1, 2]. In yeast, Rec8 is kept in a non-phosphorylated state by the action of PP2A-B56, which is localised to the centromere region, thereby preventing cohesin removal from this region in meiosis I[3-5]. However, it is unknown whether Rec8 has to be equally phosphorylated for cleavage, and whether centromeric cohesin protection is indeed brought about by dephosphorylation of Rec8 preventing cleavage, in mammalian meiosis. The identity of one or several potential Rec8-specific kinase(s) is also unknown. This is due to technical challenges, as Rec8 is poorly conserved preventing a direct translation of the knowledge gained from model systems such as yeast and C. elegans to mammals, and additionally, there is no turn-over of Rec8 after cohesion establishment, preventing phospho mutant analysis of functional Rec8. To address how Rec8 cleavage is brought about in mammals, we adapted a biosensor for Separase to study Rec8 cleavage in single mouse oocytes by live imaging, and identified phosphorylation sites promoting cleavage. We found that Rec8 cleavage by Separase depends on Aurora B/C kinase activity, and identified a residue promoting cleavage and being phosphorylated in an Aurora B/C kinase-dependent manner. Accordingly, inhibition of Aurora B/C kinase during meiotic maturation impairs endogenous Rec8 phosphorylation and chromosome segregation.

Centromere Mapping Functions for Aneuploid Meiotic Products: Analysis of rec8, rec10 and rec11 Mutants of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle D Krawchuk ◽  
Wayne P Wahls
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Products Analysis ◽  
Meiosis I

AbstractRecent evidence suggests that the position of reciprocal recombination events (crossovers) is important for the segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I and sister chromatids during meiosis II. We developed genetic mapping functions that permit the simultaneous analysis of centromere-proximal crossover recombination and the type of segregation error leading to aneuploidy. The mapping functions were tested in a study of the rec8, rec10, and rec11 mutants of fission yeast. In each mutant we monitored each of the three chromosome pairs. Between 38 and 100% of the chromosome segregation errors in the rec8 mutants were due to meiosis I nondisjunction of homologous chromosomes. The remaining segregation errors were likely the result of precocious separation of sister chromatids, a previously described defect in the rec8 mutants. Between 47 and 100% of segregation errors in the rec10 and rec11 mutants were due to nondisjunction of sister chromatids during meiosis II. In addition, centromere-proximal recombination was reduced as much as 14-fold or more on chromosomes that had experienced nondisjunction. These results demonstrate the utility of the new mapping functions and support models in which sister chromatid cohesion and crossover position are important determinants for proper chromosome segregation in each meiotic division.

scholarly journals Direct evaluation of cohesin-mediated sister kinetochore associations at meiosis I in fission yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Nambu ◽  
Atsuki Kishikawa ◽  
Takatomi Yamada ◽  
Kento Ichikawa ◽  
Yunosuke Kira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Direct Evaluation ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Pheromone Signaling ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Meiosis I

Kinetochores drive chromosome segregation by mediating chromosome interactions with the spindle. In higher eukaryotes, sister kinetochores are separately positioned on opposite sides of sister centromeres during mitosis, but associate with each other during meiosis I. Kinetochore association facilitates the attachment of sister chromatids to the same pole, enabling the segregation of homologous chromosomes toward opposite poles. In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Rec8-containing meiotic cohesin is suggested to establish kinetochore associations by mediating cohesion of the centromere cores. However, cohesin-mediated kinetochore associations on intact chromosomes have never been demonstrated directly. Here, we describe a novel method for the direct evaluation of kinetochore associations on intact chromosomes in live S. pombe cells, and demonstrate that sister kinetochores and the centromere cores are positioned separately on mitotic chromosomes but associate with each other on meiosis I chromosomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that kinetochore association depends on meiotic cohesin and the cohesin regulators, Moa1 and Mrc1, and requires mating-pheromone signaling for its establishment. These results confirm cohesin-mediated kinetochore association and its regulatory mechanisms, along with the usefulness of the developed method for its analysis.

scholarly journals Meiosis I chromosome segregation is established through regulation of microtubule–kinetochore interactions

eLife ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P Miller ◽  
Elçin Ünal ◽  
Gloria A Brar ◽  
Angelika Amon
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Segregation Pattern ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Segregation Behavior ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Unusual Chromosome ◽  
Meiosis I

During meiosis, a single round of DNA replication is followed by two consecutive rounds of nuclear divisions called meiosis I and meiosis II. In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes segregate, while sister chromatids remain together. Determining how this unusual chromosome segregation behavior is established is central to understanding germ cell development. Here we show that preventing microtubule–kinetochore interactions during premeiotic S phase and prophase I is essential for establishing the meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern. Premature interactions of kinetochores with microtubules transform meiosis I into a mitosis-like division by disrupting two key meiosis I events: coorientation of sister kinetochores and protection of centromeric cohesin removal from chromosomes. Furthermore we find that restricting outer kinetochore assembly contributes to preventing premature engagement of microtubules with kinetochores. We propose that inhibition of microtubule–kinetochore interactions during premeiotic S phase and prophase I is central to establishing the unique meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern.

scholarly journals Paired arrangement of kinetochores together with microtubule pivoting and dynamics drive kinetochore capture in meiosis I

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gheorghe Cojoc ◽  
Ana-Maria Florescu ◽  
Alexander Krull ◽  
Anna H. Klemm ◽  
Nenad Pavin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
General Feature ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Single Object ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Angular Movement ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract Kinetochores are protein complexes on the chromosomes, whose function as linkers between spindle microtubules and chromosomes is crucial for proper cell division. The mechanisms that facilitate kinetochore capture by microtubules are still unclear. In the present study, we combine experiments and theory to explore the mechanisms of kinetochore capture at the onset of meiosis I in fission yeast. We show that kinetochores on homologous chromosomes move together, microtubules are dynamic and pivot around the spindle pole, and the average capture time is 3–4 minutes. Our theory describes paired kinetochores on homologous chromosomes as a single object, as well as angular movement of microtubules and their dynamics. For the experimentally measured parameters, the model reproduces the measured capture kinetics and shows that the paired configuration of kinetochores accelerates capture, whereas microtubule pivoting and dynamics have a smaller contribution. Kinetochore pairing may be a general feature that increases capture efficiency in meiotic cells.

scholarly journals TRIM37 prevents formation of condensate-organized ectopic spindle poles to ensure mitotic fidelity

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Meitinger ◽  
Dong Kong ◽  
Midori Ohta ◽  
Arshad Desai ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Mulibrey Nanism ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pathological Mechanism ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Centrosomal Proteins

Centrosomes are composed of a centriolar core surrounded by pericentriolar material that nucleates microtubules. The ubiquitin ligase TRIM37 localizes to centrosomes, but its centrosomal roles are not yet defined. We show that TRIM37 does not control centriole duplication, structure, or the ability of centrioles to form cilia but instead prevents assembly of an ectopic centrobin-scaffolded structured condensate that forms by budding off of centrosomes. In ∼25% of TRIM37-deficient cells, the condensate organizes an ectopic spindle pole, recruiting other centrosomal proteins and acquiring microtubule nucleation capacity during mitotic entry. Ectopic spindle pole–associated transient multipolarity and multipolar segregation in TRIM37-deficient cells are suppressed by removing centrobin, which interacts with and is ubiquitinated by TRIM37. Thus, TRIM37 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by preventing the formation of centrobin-scaffolded condensates that organize ectopic spindle poles. Mutations in TRIM37 cause the disorder mulibrey nanism, and patient-derived cells harbor centrobin condensate-organized ectopic poles, leading us to propose that chromosome missegregation is a pathological mechanism in this disorder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document