Distribution of Programming in a Rapid Aimed Sequential Movement

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. Smiley-Oyen ◽  
C.J. Worringham

Studies indicate that rapid sequential movements are preprogrammed and that preprogramming increases with complexity, but more complex sequences that require on-line programming have seldom been studied. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether on-line programming occurs in a 7-target sequence in which there is a unique target constraint and if so, to determine how different task constraints affect the distribution of additional programming. Subjects contacted seven targets with a hand-held stylus as quickly as possible while maintaining a 90% hit rate. Initiation- and execution-timing patterns and movement kinematics were measured to determine when the additional programming took place. Results indicated that additional programming occurred before initiation and during movement to the first target when the constraint required more spatial accuracy (small target). A different type of unique target (a triple hit of one target) caused the additional programming to occur on-line one or two segments before its execution. Different positions of the unique target also affected timing patterns. Results were discussed in terms of: (1) capacity of processing; (2) control of movement variance; and (3) mean velocity as a programmed parameter in sequential aiming movements.

Author(s):  
James W. Roberts ◽  
James Maiden ◽  
Gavin P. Lawrence

AbstractThe task constraints imposed upon a co-actor can often influence our own actions. Likewise, the observation of somebody else’s movements can involuntarily contaminate the execution of our own movements. These joint action outcomes have rarely been considered in unison. The aim of the present study was to simultaneously examine the underlying processes contributing to joint action. We had pairs of participants work together to execute sequential aiming movements between two targets—the first person’s movement was contingent upon the anticipation of the second person’s movement (leader), while the second person’s movement was contingent upon the direct observation of the first person’s movement (follower). Participants executed separate blocks of two-target aiming movements under different contexts; that is, solely on their own using one (2T1L) and two (2T2L) of their upper limbs, or with another person (2T2P). The first movement segment generally indicated a more abrupt approach (shorter time after peak velocity, greater displacement and magnitude of peak velocity), which surprisingly coincided with lower spatial variability, for the 2T2P context. Meanwhile, the second segment indicated a similar kinematic profile as the first segment for the 2T2P context. The first movement of the leader appeared to accommodate the follower for their movement, while the second movement of the follower was primed by the observation of the leader’s movement. These findings collectively advocate two distinct levels of joint action including the anticipation (top–down) and mapping (bottom–up) of other people’s actions.


1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Blouin ◽  
C. Bard ◽  
N. Teasdale ◽  
M. Fleury

2016 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.P. Lawrence ◽  
Michael A. Khan ◽  
Thomas M. Mottram ◽  
Jos J. Adam ◽  
Eric Buckolz

2011 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Khan ◽  
Salah Sarteep ◽  
Thomas M. Mottram ◽  
Gavin P. Lawrence ◽  
Jos J. Adam

Cortex ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
A LAVRYSEN ◽  
W HELSEN ◽  
L TREMBLAY ◽  
D ELLIOTT ◽  
J ADAM ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Paola Ribeiro Coqueiro ◽  
Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas ◽  
Cassandra Mendes Assunção e Silva ◽  
Sandra Regina Alouche

Background.Brain hemispheres play different roles in the control of aiming movements that are impaired after unilateral stroke. It is not clear whether those roles are influenced by the direction and the difficulty of the task.Objective.To evaluate the influence of direction and index of difficulty (ID) of the task on performance of ipsilesional aiming movements after unilateral stroke.Methods.Ten individuals with right hemisphere stroke, ten with left hemisphere stroke, and ten age- and gender-matched controls performed the aiming movements on a digitizing tablet as fast as possible. Stroke individuals used their ipsilesional arm. The direction (ipsilateral or contralateral), size (0.8 or 1.6 cm), and distance (9 or 18 cm) of the targets, presented on a monitor, were manipulated and determined to be of different ID (3.5, 4.5, and 5.5).Results.Individuals with right hemisphere lesion were more sensitive to ID of the task, affecting planning and final position accuracy. Left hemisphere lesion generated slower and less smooth movements and was more influenced by target distance. Contralateral movements and higher ID increased planning demands and hindered movement execution.Conclusion.Right and left hemisphere damages are differentially influenced by task constraints which suggest their complementary roles in the control of aiming movements.


1995 ◽  
Vol 90 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 333-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Spijkers ◽  
Simone Spellerberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document