scholarly journals The influence of protein nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Campbell ◽  
A. C. Dunkin
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Growth Performance ◽  
Early Life ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Protein Retention ◽  
Protein Nutrition ◽  
Low Protein

1. The effects of feeding either a high-protein (HP) diet or a low-protein (LP) diet between 1·8 and 15 kg live weight (LW) and a low-energy (LE) or a high-energy (HE) intake but at the same protein intake subsequent to 15 kg LW on the performance and body composition of pigs growing to 75 kg LW were investigated.2. During the LW period 1·8–15 kg, pigs given the LP diet exhibited poorer growth performance (P < 0·01) and at 15 kg contained more fat (P < 0·01) in their empty bodies than pigs given the HP diet.3. On the LE treatment subsequent to 15 kg LW, pigs previously given the LP diet deposited protein at a faster rate and exhibited more rapid and efficient growth to 60 kg LW than those given the HP diet before 15 kg. However, on the HE treatment, pigs previously given the LP diet deposited protein at a slower rate and exhibited poorer growth performance (P < 0·05) between 15 and 45 kg LW but grew at a faster rate between 45 and 60 kg LW than pigs previously given the HP diet.4. On the LE treatment subsequent to 15 kg LW the differences in body composition between the two protein groups were no longer significant at 45 kg. However, on the HE treatment, pigs previously given the LP diet remained fatter (P < 0·05) to 60 kg LW than those previously given the HP diet.5. The results suggested that restricting protein intake between 1.8 and 15 kg LW reduced, temporarily, the upper limit of protein retention and growth performance during subsequent development. This finding is discussed in relation to the effects of protein nutrition in early life on the hyperplasic development of muscle tissue.

scholarly journals Effects of a β-andrenergic agonist on growth performance, body composition and nutrient retention in finishing pigs fed normal or low amounts of protein

1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bracher-Jakob ◽  
J. W. Blum
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Adrenergic Agonist ◽  
N Retention ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Energy Retention ◽  
Protein Feeding

ABSTRACTIn earlier studies with pigs the P-adrenergic agonist Ro 16·8714 ((3-AG) enhanced the efficiency of nitrogen (N) retention. Therefore effects of Ro 16·8714 were studied on growth rate, body composition, N, fat and energy retention in pigs fed isoenergetically, but given different amounts of protein (112 or 138 g/kg diet) without (groups LP and NP) or with 60 mg Ro 16·8714 per kg diet (groups LPP and NPP) from 60 to 100 kg live weight. Weight gain (898, 927, 855 and 810 g/day in NP, NPp, LP and LPp) decreased, whereas food: gain ratio (2·94, 2·82, 3·04 and 3·24 kg/kg in NP, NPP, LP and LPP) was increased by low protein intake (P < 0·05) and both weight gain and food conversion were modified by the interaction (P × P) of protein intake and Ro 16·8714 (P < 0·05). Killing-out proportion (820, 830, 830 and 830 g/kg in groups NP, NPp, LP and LPP) was modified by protein intake and Ro 16·8714 (P < 0·05). Carcass growth rate (760, 814, 748 and 723 g/day in NP, NPP, LP and LPP) was modified by protein intake and by P × p (P < 0·05), while non-carcass growth rate (90, 77, 76 and 56 g/day in NP, NPP, LP and LPP) was changed by protein intake and by Ro 16·8714 (P < 0·05). Compared with NP, weights of kidneys (−0·025 kg), small intestine (−0·26 kg) and large intestine (−0·17 kg) were decreased by low protein feeding, and weights of heart, spleen and stomach decreased in response to Ro 16·8714 (-002, -0·02 and -0·06 kg; P < 0·05) while both low protein intake and Ro 16·8714 reduced liver weight (−0·12 and −0·23 kg, respectively; P < 0·05) and blood volume obtained at slaughter (-0·12 and -0·23 kg; P < 0·05). Carcass N (1813, 1970, 1786 and 1825 g in NP NPp, LP and LPP) increased in response to Ro 16-8714, but was reduced by low protein intake (P < 0·05), while noncarcass N (330, 309, 312 and 285 g in NP, NPp, LP and LPP) was decreased by both low protein intake and Ro 16-8714 (P < 0·01). Carcass and non-carcass fat (22·1, 19·9, 23·4 and 23·0 kg, respectively 1·51, 1·41, 1·59 and 1·68 kg in NP, NPp, LP and LPP) increased with low protein feeding (P < 0·05), but were not significantly influenced by Ro 16·8714. The efficiency of N retention (295, 363, 321 and 327 g/kg N retained: N intake in NP, NPp, LP and LPP) was enhanced by Ro 16·8714 (P > 0·05) whereas the efficiency of energy retention was not influenced by Ro 16·8714 and protein intake. In conclusion, an adequate intake of protein is necessary for optimum expression of many, but not all, effects of the P-adrenergic agonist Ro 16·8714.

scholarly journals Early-Life Metabolic and Hormonal Markers in Blood and Growth until Age 2 Years: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Infants Fed a Modified Low-Protein Infant Formula

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1159
Author(s):  
Stefanie M. P. Kouwenhoven ◽  
Manja Fleddermann ◽  
Martijn J. J. Finken ◽  
Jos W. R. Twisk ◽  
Eline M. van der Beek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Early Life ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Blood Parameters ◽  
Anthropometric Parameters ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Breast Fed

Background: High protein intake in early life is associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity. Dietary protein intake may be a key mechanistic modulator through alterations in endocrine and metabolic responses. Objective: We aimed to determine the impact of different protein intake of infants on blood metabolic and hormonal markers at the age of four months. We further aimed to investigate the association between these markers and anthropometric parameters and body composition until the age of two years. Design: Term infants received a modified low-protein formula (mLP) (1.7 g protein/100 kcal) or a specifically designed control formula (CTRL) (2.1 g protein/100 kcal) until 6 months of age in a double blinded RCT. The outcomes were compared with a breast-fed (BF) group. Glucose, insulin, leptin, IGF-1, IGF-BP1, -BP2, and -BP3 levels were measured at the age of 4 months. Anthropometric parameters and body composition were assessed until the age of 2 years. Groups were compared using linear regression analysis. Results: No significant differences were observed in any of the blood parameters between the formula groups (n = 53 mLP; n = 44 CTRL) despite a significant difference in protein intake. Insulin and HOMA-IR were higher in both formula groups compared to the BF group (n = 36) (p < 0.001). IGF-BP1 was lower in both formula groups compared to the BF group (p < 0.01). We found a lower IGF-BP2 level in the CTRL group compared to the BF group (p < 0.01) and a higher IGF-BP3 level in the mLP group compared to the BF group (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in glucose, leptin, and IGF-1 between the three feeding groups. We found specific associations of all early-life metabolic and hormonal blood parameters with long-term growth and body composition except for IGF-1. Conclusions: Reducing protein intake by 20% did not result in a different metabolic profile in formula-fed infants at 4 months of age. Formula-fed infants had a lower insulin sensitivity compared to breast-fed infants. We found associations between all metabolic and hormonal markers (except for IGF-1) determined at age 4 months and growth and body composition up to two years of age.

The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation

1984 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. King ◽  
I. H. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Protein Intake ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
High Protein ◽  
Weight Losses ◽  
Lactation Length ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Daily Intakes ◽  
Dietary Treatments

A factorial experiment involving high (53·1 to 59·5 MJ) and low (25·4 to 27·1 MJ) daily intakes of digestible energy, and high (550 to 745 g) and low (302 to 318 g) daily intakes of crude protein during lactation, was conducted with 68 first-litter sows. Average lactation length was 32 days, and average backfat changes during lactation were +0·3, −1·4, −7·2 and −5·4 mm for the high energy/high protein, high energy/low protein, low energy/high protein and low energy/low protein combinations, respectively. The corresponding mean live-weight losses during lactation were 3·9, 32·5, 29·8 and 35·8 kg. Within 8 days of weaning, more sows receiving high intakes of both energy and protein during lactation exhibited oestrus (0·88 v. 0·53, x2 = 6·7, P < 0·01) than sows whose energy and/or protein intake throughout lactation had been restricted. Nitrogen balances of sows were determined between 18 and 22 days after farrowing. Sows receiving high intakes of both energy and protein during lactation were in positive nitrogen balance, whereas the nitrogen balances of sows on the other three dietary treatments during lactation were similar to each other but negative. Ovulation rate, subsequent litter size and embryo mortality were not significantly affected by energy or protein intake during lactation.

Effects of restrictions of energy, protein or both on growth and body composition of pigs

1977 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Carden ◽  
P. R. Goenaga
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Weight Distribution ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
High Protein ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Low Protein

SummaryAn experiment was carried out, using Duroc Jersey barrows, to test the hypothesis that relationships within the pig fat-free carcass remain unaltered when varying the principal dietary factors: energy, protein or both. Twelve pigs were assigned to each of the following diets: high energy-high protein (HEHP), used as control group; low energy-high protein (LEHP); high energy-low protein (HELP) and low energy-low protein (LELP). From 30 kg live weight onwards the animals were individually penned and fed once a day the experimental rations, on a restricted scale of feeding related to live weight. Compared with the control group, daily intake of metabolizable energy was approximately 37% lower in LEHP and LELP groups while daily protein intake was approximately 25% lower in HELP and LELP groups.In each group the 12 pigs were slaughtered between 60 and 110 kg. The right half carcasses were completely dissected using strictly anatomical criteria. The main growth characteristics of the four treatments were described by second degree polynomials fitted to the live weight-age data. Each treatment produced a characteristic growth curve. In every case significant differences were found in the polynomial coefficients. Data on body composition were subjected to analysis of covariance, using the linear model y = a + bx. When growth of different parts of a whole were studied the weight of that whole was used as the independent variable. When muscle:bone ratio was examined the weight of total side muscle was used as covariate in the covariance analysis for total side bone.The major treatment effects were on the relationship between fat and non-fat tissues in the carcass. Thus, in relation to dissected side weight, HELP animals had more fat and less muscle and bone than controls, while LEHP and LELP pigs had more muscle and bone and less adipose tissue. Within the fat-free carcass several differences were found on muscle weight distribution. LEHP, HELP and LELP pigs had a higher proportion of ‘expensive muscles’. However, the magnitude of these changes was small and likely to be of little commercial importance. On the other hand, only minor differences were found in bone weight distribution. These were confined to the scapula and femur. Muscle:bone ratio was not affected by the treatments. Within the adipose tissue differences were observed in growth rates from the different depots relative to total side fat. Thus, it would appear that the growth rate of the subcutaneous depot was higher and that of the intermuscular one lower in LEHP and LELP animals. The body cavity depot was less in these animals.

scholarly journals Partitioning of limiting protein and energy in the growing pig: testing quantitative rules against experimental data

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik B. Sandberg ◽  
Gerry C. Emmans ◽  
Ilias Kyriazakis
Keyword(s):  
Protein Intake ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Food Composition ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Protein Ratio ◽  
Protein Retention ◽  
Material Efficiency ◽  
Growing Pig ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Ideal Protein

Literature solutions to the problem of protein and energy partitioning in the growing pig are quantitatively examined. Possible effects of live weight, genotype and food composition on the marginal response in protein retention to protein and energy intakes, on protein and energy-limiting foods are quantified. No evidence was found that the marginal response in protein retention to ideal protein supply, when protein intake is limiting, is affected by live weight, genotype or environmental temperature. There was good evidence that live weight does not affect the marginal response in protein retention to energy intake when protein intake is not limiting. Limited data for different genotypes suggested no effects on this response. A general quantitative partitioning rule is proposed that has two key parameters;ep* (the maximum marginal efficiency for retaining the first limiting amino acid) andR* (the maximum value ofR, the energy to protein ratio of the food, MJ metabolisable energy (ME)/kg digestible crude protein (DCP), whenep* is just achieved). WhenR<R* the material efficiency of using ideal protein is (ep*/R*)×R. The value ofep* was determined to be 0·763 (se 0·0130). There was no good experimental evidence thatep* is different for different amino acids. The best estimate ofR* was 67·9 (se 1·65) MJ ME/kg DCP. Live weight, genotype and temperature did not affect the values of either parameter. A more general understanding of partitioning, including the effects of ‘stressors’ such as disease, may be achieved by using the preferred rule as a starting point.

The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig 3. Effects of energy intake prior and subsequent to 10 kg on growth and development to 30 kg live weight

1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Campbell ◽  
A. C. Dunkin
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Growth Performance ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
High Level ◽  
Subcutaneous Adipose

ABSTRACT1. Forty-two piglets were used to study the effects of a low, medium or high level of energy intake (1·0, 1·4 and 1·9 MJ gross energy per kg W0·75 per day respectively) from 1·8 to 10 kg live weight and a low or high level of energy intake (1·4 and 1·8 MJ digestible energy per kg W075 per day respectively) subsequent to 10 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue to 30 kg live weight. During both live-weight periods all pigs received the same daily intake of crude protein.2. Raising energy intake in the period prior to 10 kg live weight increased (P < 0·-05) growth rate, body fat content and fat cell size but reduced food conversion efficiency, body protein and water (P < 0·05) and muscle deoxyribonucleic acid. These effects on body composition and muscle deoxyribonucleic acid at 10 kg live weight were still evident at 30 kg live weight.3. Subsequent to 10 kg live weight, pigs previously given the lowest energy intake deposited protein and fat at a faster rate and exhibited more rapid and efficient growth (P < 0·05) than pigs previously given the high energy intake.4. At 30 kg live weight pigs given the two higher levels of energy intake before 10 kg live weight contained less deoxyribonucleic acid (P < 0·05) in subcutaneous adipose tissue and had larger (P < 0·05) fat cells than those given the lowest energy intake before 10 kg live weight.5. The effects of energy intake subsequent to 10 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of muscle and adipose tissue were qualitatively the same as those for the period 1·8 to 10 kg live weight.

scholarly journals Feeding value of raw and boiled pigeon pea seed meal on the growth performance of local pullet chicks

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. U. Amaefule ◽  
C. O. Okereke
Keyword(s):  
Growth Performance ◽  
Feed Intake ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Pigeon Pea ◽  
Daily Weight Gain ◽  
Seed Meal ◽  
Feed Conversion ◽  
Feeding Value ◽  
Pea Seed

A total of 324 local pullet chicks (1- 8 weeks) were used for the research project to evaluate the feeding value of raw and boiled pigeon pea seed meal (PSM) on their growth performance. Nine iso-caloric and isonitrogenous diets were formulated, with raw and boiled pigeon pea seed meal at inclusion levels of 0%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%, respectively. There were 36 chicks per treatment replicated into 3 at 12 chicks per replicate. There were significant interactions between form and PSM levels on the final live weight, daily feed intake and daily protein intake. Final live weight of pullets fed both raw and boiled PSM followed the same trend, pullets fed control (0%) and 15% raw PSM 128.10 and 132.33g respectively performed better than the rest of the treatment levels but statistically similar at all levels. Daily feed intake and daily protein intake showed significant interaction among the treatments. Pullets fed control (8.95g) and raw diets (8.79g) consumed more feed than pullets fed boiled PSM II (105.05g), III (117.77g) IV (91.27g) and V (112.80g) diets. Daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio had no significant (P>0.05) interaction between form and treatment groups for the pullets. 30% PSM raw or boiled can be fed to local pullet chicks without any deleterious effect on the growth performance.

The effect of dietary energy concentration and lysine/digestible energy ratio on growth performance and nitrogen deposition of young hybrid pigs

1998 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Van Lunen ◽  
D. J. A. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Growth Performance ◽  
Nitrogen Deposition ◽  
Deposition Rate ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Energy Utilization ◽  
Energy Concentration ◽  
Dietary Energy ◽  
Digestible Energy ◽  
Gross Energy

AbstractAn experiment was conducted to examine the effects of dietary lysine/digestible energy (DE) ratio (g/MJ) and dietary energy concentration on growth performance and body composition of young hybrid gilts from 9·1 to 25·4 kg live weight. Seven pigs were assigned to each of 10 dietary treatments consisting of lysine/DE ratios from 0·6 to 1·4 in 0·2 g/MJ increments and two DE concentrations (14·25 and 16·40 MJ/kg). Food was provided ad libitum and at 25·4 kg all pigs were slaughtered and body composition was determined. Responses to lysine/DE ratios were different for each DE concentration. The pigs given the 16·40 MJ/kg DE diets had a higher daily live-weight gain (DLWG) and nitrogen deposition rate (NDR) than those given the 14·25 MJ/kg diets up to the 1·2 g/MJ lysine/DE ratio. Beyond this point no DE effects were evident. Lipid deposition rate (LDR) was higher for all 16·40 MJ/kg diets as compared with the 14·25 MJ/kg diets and decreased with increasing lysine/DE ratio. The 14·25 MJ/kg diets resulted in increasing efficiency of nitrogen and gross energy utilization with increasing lysinel DE ratio up to the 1·0 g/MJ ratio after which it declined. Efficiency of lipid utilization decreased with increasing lysine/DE ratio for all 14·25 MJ/kg diets. The 16·40 MJ/kg diets resulted in a decrease in nitrogen and gross energy utilization efficiency with increasing lysine/DE ratio while lipid efficiency decreased up to the 1·0 g/MJ lysine/DE ratio after which it increased. Young hybrid pigs given high energy diets appear to be less sensitive to dietary lysine/DE ratio than those given lower energy diets. The optimum lysine/DE ratio for the genotype tested from 9 to 25 kg live weight was of the order of 1·2 g/MJ for both DE concentrations. The maximum DLWG and NDR of the genotype tested over the live-weight range of 9 to 25 kg appears to be of the order of 620 and 17 g/day (106 g/day protein deposition rate) respectively.

scholarly journals A modified low-protein infant formula supports adequate growth in healthy, term infants: a randomized, double-blind, equivalence trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 962-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie M P Kouwenhoven ◽  
Nadja Antl ◽  
Martijn J J Finken ◽  
Jos W R Twisk ◽  
Eline M van der Beek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Infant Formula ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Equivalence Trial ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Formula Group

ABSTRACT Background A high protein intake in early life is associated with a risk of obesity later in life. The essential amino acid requirements of formula-fed infants have been reassessed recently, enabling a reduction in total protein content and thus in protein intake. Objectives We aimed to assess the safety of an infant formula with a modified amino acid profile and a modified low-protein (mLP) content in healthy term-born infants. Outcomes were compared with a specifically designed control (CTRL) infant formula. Methods In this double-blind, randomized controlled equivalence trial, infants received either mLP (1.7 g protein/100 kcal; n = 90) or CTRL formula (2.1 g protein/100 kcal; n = 88) from enrollment (age ≤ 45 d) to 6 mo of age. A breastfed group served as a reference (n = 67). Anthropometry and body composition were determined at baseline, 17 wk (including safety blood parameters), and 6 mo of age. The primary outcome was daily weight gain from enrollment up until the age of 17 wk (at an equivalence margin of ±3.0 g/d). Results Weight gain from baseline (mean ± SD age: 31 ± 9 d) up to the age of 17 wk was equivalent between the mLP and CTRL formula groups (27.9 and 28.8 g/d, respectively; difference: −0.86 g/d; 90% CI: −2.36, 0.63 g/d). No differences in other growth parameters, body composition, or in adverse events were observed. Urea was significantly lower in the mLP formula group than in the CTRL formula group (−0.74 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.97, −0.51 mmol/L; P &lt; 0.001). Growth rates, fat mass, fat-free mass, and several essential amino acids were significantly higher in both formula groups than in the breastfed reference group. Conclusions Feeding an infant formula with a modified amino acid profile and a lower protein content from an average age of 1 mo until the age of 6 mo is safe and supports an adequate growth, similar to that of infants consuming CTRL formula. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as Trial NL4677.

The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig 1. Effects of protein nutrition prior and subsequent to 6·5 kg on growth and development to 45 kg

1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Campbell ◽  
A. C. Dunkin
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Growth Performance ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Dietary Protein ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Crude Protein ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Body Protein ◽  
Protein Diets ◽  
Protein Treatment

ABSTRACTForty-five piglets were used to study the effects of feeding diets containing 153, 239 or 321 g crude protein per kg dry matter between 1·8 and 6·5 kg live weight, and low and high protein diets subsequent to 6·5 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of skeletal muscle to 45 kg live weight.Reducing dietary crude protein between 1·8 and 6·5 kg live weight depressed growth performance and at 6·5 kg live weight increased body fat content but reduced body protein, body water and the weight and DNA content of the adductor muscle. The effects of dietary protein content before 6·5 kg live weight on body composition at the latter weight were still evident in pigs killed at 11·5 kg live weight whilst the differences in muscle DNA persisted to 45 kg live weight.On the lower protein treatment subsequent to 6·5 kg live weight there was a tendency for pigs given the lowest protein diet before 6-5 kg live weight to exhibit better growth performance and deposit protein at a faster rate than those given the higher protein diets. However, these responses were reversed on the higher protein treatment subsequent to 6·5 kg live weight.The effects of dietary protein content subsequent to 6·5 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of muscle tissue were qualitatively the same as those for the live-weight phase 1·8 to 6·5 kg.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document