Chapter 6. The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures

2017 ◽  
pp. 93-107
Author(s):  
Lotte van Poppel
Keyword(s):  
Pragmatic Argumentation

The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aranka Akkermans ◽  
Francisca Snoeck Henkemans ◽  
Nanon Labrie ◽  
Inge Henselmans ◽  
Hanneke van Laarhoven
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Health Communication ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Reliable Measurement ◽  
Pragmatic Argumentation

Abstract A recent line of argumentation research has focused on the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns – patterns that can be theoretically expected in view of the type of standpoint defended, the institutional aim, and the conventions and constraints of the context (Van Eemeren 2016: 13–15). This paper aims to add a new dimension to both this line of research and research on health communication by determining whether the prototypical types of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer are stereotypical as well, that is, whether they are dominant in a quantitative sense (van Eemeren 2016: 16). For this purpose, a valid and reliable measurement instrument is developed and used in a content analysis of the transcripts of 49 consultations. On the basis of the results of this analysis, it can be concluded that the use of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation is stereotypical in this type of consultations.

Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation

2011 ◽  
pp. 21-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Doury ◽  
Ton van Haaften ◽  
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Maneuvering ◽  
Pragmatic Argumentation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document