Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Photosynthesis and Transpiration by Single Leaves in a Rainforest Tree, Argyrodendron peralatum

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Doley ◽  
GL Unwin ◽  
DJ Yates

The light environments and rates of photosynthesis by leaves of Argyrodendron peralatum (F. M. Bailey) I.H. Boas were examined at eight positions within a natural rainforest canopy. Daily integrals of irradiance at leaf surfaces expressed as a percentage of that reaching a horizontal sensor in the open decreased from about 50% in the uppermost leaves to about 20% at a point 2 m below the top of the crown and to 10-15% in the lower crown and understory. Leaves in the upper crown had maximum instantaneous rates of apparent photosynthesis of 11.5 �mol CO2 m-2 s-1, whilst leaves in the lower crown of the same tree, and in understory saplings had maximum photosynthesis rates of 8.2 �mol m-2 s-1. These rates were not significantly different, and are within the range observed in a number of rainforest species characteristic of later successional stages. Under conditions of adequate water supply, photosynthetic rate was light-saturated by 500 �mol quanta m-2 s-1, irrespective of level in the canopy.

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Adolfo Rosati ◽  
Damiano Marchionni ◽  
Dario Mantovani ◽  
Luigi Ponti ◽  
Franco Famiani

We quantified the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception in a high-density (HD) and a super high-density (SHD) or hedgerow olive system, by measuring the PAR transmitted under the canopy along transects at increasing distance from the tree rows. Transmitted PAR was measured every minute, then cumulated over the day and the season. The frequencies of the different PAR levels occurring during the day were calculated. SHD intercepted significantly but slightly less overall PAR than HD (0.57 ± 0.002 vs. 0.62 ± 0.03 of the PAR incident above the canopy) but had a much greater spatial variability of transmitted PAR (0.21 under the tree row, up to 0.59 in the alley center), compared to HD (range: 0.34–0.43). This corresponded to greater variability in the frequencies of daily PAR values, with the more shaded positions receiving greater frequencies of low PAR values. The much lower PAR level under the tree row in SHD, compared to any position in HD, implies greater self-shading in lower-canopy layers, despite similar overall interception. Therefore, knowing overall PAR interception does not allow an understanding of differences in PAR distribution on the ground and within the canopy and their possible effects on canopy radiation use efficiency (RUE) and performance, between different architectural systems.


2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 537-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ombretta Largiuni ◽  
Emiliano Castellano ◽  
Alessio Migliori ◽  
Rita Traversi ◽  
Giovanni Piccardi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document