Induction of Sensitivity to Gibberellic Acid in Wheat and Barley Caryopses: Effects of Dehydration, Temperature and the Role of the Embryo during Caryopsis Maturation

1986 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 785 ◽  
Author(s):  
PB Nicholls

The development of gibberellic acid sensitivity, which is measured by the level of α-amylase activity, has been investigated by comparing enzyme levels in freshly detached wheat and barley caryopses cultured on moist filter paper for various times and temperatures with those in caryopses dried over 35% (w / w) glycerol-water solutions or in caryopses air-dried in detached ears at controlled temperatures and by comparing enzyme levels in de-embryonated caryopses with intact ones, both being cultured in aqueous buffer solutions. Similar amounts of enzyme were produced in caryopses held moist or dried, although the duration of the lag period, and the rate of accumulation of α-amylase were markedly influenced by the length and temperature of main treatments. Likewise similar amounts of enzyme were produced in de-embryonated and intact caryopses cultured in an aqueous buffer if the latter were de- embryonated prior to incubation in solutions of gibberellic acid. However, when intact or de-brushed (removal of the apical tip) caryopses were incubated with GA3, less α-amylase was found in these incubates than in those incubates containing de-embryonated caryopses. These observations were found in incubates of both sensitized freshly harvested and normal mature caryopses. It is concluded that drying is not essential for the development of gibberellic acid sensitivity in the wheat and barley caryopses.

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1597-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Wurzburger ◽  
Y. Leshem ◽  
D. Koller

Large and small Aegilops Kotschyi caryopses have low α-amylase activity. After imbibition in water a marked increase takes place in α-amylase activity in the large, hulled and dehulled caryopses and only a slight increase in the small ones. Exogenously applied gibberellic acid (GA3) enhances α-amylase activity in both caryopses, and also improves germination of the small, hulled caryopses.Removing parts of the hull from different sites on the palea or lemma of the small caryopses improves germination. The most pronounced effect was obtained when the segment was removed from the palea just above the embryo. When this excised site was covered with a strip of wet filter paper before germination, the resulting germination was essentially similar to that of the non-excised controls.The role of GA3 and seed coat in improving germination of small Aegilops caryopses is discussed.


Genetics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-689
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R Powell ◽  
Marko Andjelković

ABSTRACT Two polymorphic systems impinging on α-amylase in Drosophila pseudoobscura have been studied in laboratory populations maintained on medium in which the only carbohydrate source was starch (the substrate of amylase) and replicas maintained on medium in which the only carbohydrate source was maltose (the product of amylase). The two polymorphic systems were alleles at the structural gene (Amy) coding for the enzyme (allozymes) and variation in the tissue-specific expression along the adult midgut controlled by several genes. In the seven populations on maltose medium little consistent change was noted in either system. In the seven populations on starch medium, both polymorphisms exhibited selective changes. A midgut pattern of very limited expression of amylase rose in frequency in all starch populations, as did the frequency of the "fast" (1.00) Amy allele. The overall specific amylase activity did not differ between starch-adapted and maltose-adapted flies.—The results, along with previous studies, indicate that when a gene-enzyme system is specifically stressed in laboratory populations, allozymes often exhibit selective differences. Such results make the selectionist hypothesis at least tenable. Furthermore, the fact that both types of polymorphisms responded to selection indicates the role of structural gene vs. gene regulation changes in adaptive evolution is not an either/or question but one of relative roles and interactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 153343
Author(s):  
Saki Horie ◽  
Hikaru Fujita ◽  
Rina Yamashita ◽  
Munetaka Kunishima

Planta ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. R. Harvey ◽  
Ann Oaks

2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (10) ◽  
pp. 2015-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander D. Pavlista ◽  
Dipak K. Santra ◽  
David D. Baltensperger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document