scholarly journals Culturally and linguistically diverse patients' views of multimorbidity and general practice care

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen McKinlay ◽  
Stewart Graham ◽  
Pauline Horrill

INTRODUCTION: It is recognised that patients who are culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) have challenges in accessing health care and understanding health advice or instructions. Those with multimorbidity (MM) are likely to have additional difficulties. In New Zealand, little is known about how this patient group view their health and general practice health care. This study examined the views of multimorbid CALD patients about MM and the health care available in a Very Low Cost Access general practice. METHODS: This qualitative study recruited Samoan, Cook Island Maori, and Cambodian patients with diabetes and more than three other long-term conditions. Two individual interviews and two language-specific focus groups were undertaken to yield themes representing the experience of these CALD patients with MM. FINDINGS: Participants described MM as having considerable impact on their life. They reported feeling responsible for supporting their own health and many detailed self-management techniques. However, they also expressed confusion, lack of information and limited understanding of MM, in particular about managing medication. Not all patients were aware of the range of available general practice services and some described difficulties in accessing general practice care. CONCLUSION: Despite being motivated to self-manage, this patient group report challenges in understanding their conditions and how to manage them, which may also be influenced by health beliefs. Available general practice services are not well known by CALD patients with MM. There is likely to be value in developing a specific structured, yet patient-centred, model of care for this group of patients. KEYWORDS: Access to health care; ethnic groups; focus groups; general practice; health literacy; self care

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen McKinlay ◽  
Marjan Kljakovic ◽  
Lynn McBain

AIM: To describe and compare how men and health professionals perceive men’s health and health care. METHOD: A qualitative study with an inductive thematic analysis of transcripts from three sequential sets of focus groups. The first set included groups totalling 21 general practitioners and 10 practice nurses; the second set with a group of 12 men under 25 years and a group of 10 older men over 35 years; and the third set with the original groups of health professionals. Datasets were analysed individually, sequentially and comparatively for men’s and health professionals’ beliefs about health and health care. RESULTS: In the initial focus groups, health professionals reported system, structural, and attitudinal barriers inhibiting men attending general practice. Men reported broad-based health beliefs and, despite reluctance to seek formal health care, men value general practice care and want recognition of their preferred consulting styles. In the final focus groups, researchers fed-back analysis of the health professionals’ and men’s focus group data with the aim of encouraging further focussed men’s health initiatives. However, there was a general lack of enthusiasm from health professionals to do more than what was being done already. CONCLUSIONS: Despite men and health professionals recognising the importance of men’s health, there is general unwillingness on the part of both men and health professionals, for different reasons, to engage with men’s health care in general practice. Understanding how men view health and health care delivery has the potential to inform alternative approaches in general practice care. KEYWORDS: New Zealand; men’s health; general practice; general practitioner; practice nurse


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Barton ◽  
Judith Proudfoot ◽  
Cheryl Amoroso ◽  
Emmae Ramsay ◽  
Christine Holton ◽  
...  

Health Policy ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Jan Mainz ◽  
Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Hilary Hearnshaw ◽  
Per Hjortdahl ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Roque ◽  
Ana Veloso ◽  
Pedro L Ferreira

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To assess the construct validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care questionnaire. METHODS We applied the Portuguese version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care to 392 users of 20 Family Health Units from the North of Portugal. The validity of the construct was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, with the Principal Axis Factoring method, by orthogonal rotation (varimax procedure), by the Kaiser normalization criteria (eigenvalue ≥ 1). The factorability of the data matrix was verified by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett’s sphericity test. We estimated the reliability by the indicator of internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha. To analyze the correlations between satisfaction and loyalty, we used the Pearson correlations. The predictor effect of satisfaction on loyalty was analyzed by simple linear regression. RESULTS Satisfaction presented five robust and well individualized dimensions – medical care, nursing care, clinical secretariat services, accessibility, and organization of services – with alpha values between 0.86 and 0.97, good levels of internal consistency. The loyalty showed alpha value of 0.72, considered a reasonable internal consistency. The satisfaction was predictive of loyalty. CONCLUSIONS The Portuguese European Task Force on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care questionnaire is a robust and reliable instrument to measure the satisfaction and loyalty of users of the Family Health Units.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document