Water use, water use efficiency and drought resistance among warm-season turfgrasses in shallow soil profiles

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Christopher J. Lambrides ◽  
Ryan Kearns ◽  
Changrong Ye ◽  
Shu Fukai

As the available water supply for urban turfgrass management is becoming limited in Australia, it will be crucial to identify drought-resistant turfgrass species and water-saving management strategies. Eight (pre-)commercial turfgrasses grown in Australia, two each of four species including the bermudagrasses (Cynodon dactylon L.), the Queensland blue couches (Digitaria didactyla Willd), the seashore paspalums (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz.) and St Augustinegrasses (Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze) were evaluated in two lysimeter experiments. Shallow lysimeters (28 and 40 cm) were used to represent shallow soil profiles typical of urban environments. We measured gravimetric water use for the eight cultivars and calculated water use efficiency (WUE, clipping yield to water use ratio) and WUEr (ratio of WUE under drought to that under irrigated conditions). WUEr measured in both experiments correlated strongly with survival period and this relationship was not affected by soil type or cutting height. Using survival period as the criterion for drought resistance, the best were the bermudagrasses and the worst were the seashore paspalums and Queensland blue couches. The bermudagrass genotypes had the lowest water use, highest WUE and WUEr and the Queensland blue couches and seashore paspalums had the greatest water use, lowest WUE and WUEr. The possible mechanisms of drought resistance included lower water use and lower stomatal conductance as indicated by higher canopy temperature in the early stage of water deficit.

2013 ◽  
Vol 864-867 ◽  
pp. 2236-2239
Author(s):  
Jun Ying Jin ◽  
Wei Hua Zhang ◽  
Bao Chang

The application of water retaining agent could evidently improve water use efficiency. The WUE was increased with the duration of using water retaining agent, compared with the control, it increased 5 to 11 times with the duration of 8 to16d, and the growth (eg. height, the ratio of shoot to root, and yield et al) and physiological indices (eg. root activities and chlorophyll contents) were not affected. Moreover, compared with the control, the proline content increased 3 times, which showed that the application of water retaining agent improve the drought resistance, and the maximum threshold was 16d for keeping the normal growth of Hemarthria compressa in this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Kumar ◽  
Youssef Rouphael ◽  
Mariateresa Cardarelli ◽  
Giuseppe Colla

Author(s):  
Li Xin ◽  
Yan Qing-wei ◽  
Zhang Lu ◽  
Liu Hui-min ◽  
Zheng Hai-xia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document