Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 4. Cottonseed meal, analogues of methionine and avoparcin

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 707 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

Ten groups, each of 6 superfine Merino wethers were individually penned indoors and hand-fed at maintenance level a ration of 70% oats and 30% chopped lucerne hay (w/w). The groups of sheep were fed 3 different supplementary pellets rotationally during three 9-week periods. Each group received 3 of the following 7 pellets: (1) control, (2) cottonseed meal (CSM), (3) CSM plus hydroxymethyl-methionine (MEP), (4) CSM plus methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA), (5) CSM plus avoparcin (AV), (6) CSM plus MEP plus AV, and (7) CSM plus MHA plus AV. The rations were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa. Wool production was measured during the 7-month period. Defaunation resulted in a 6.9% increase in greasy fleece weight and a 7.7% increase in clean wool production. Average wool fibre diameter increased by 0.6 pm in defaunated sheep. The clean wool growth responses compared with sheep fed the control pellets were 4, 5, 12, 0, 3 and 9% respectively for sheep fed pellets 2-7. The most cost-effective supplement was the CSM plus MHA pellet, which increased clean wool production by 0.5 glday compared with sheep fed the CSM pellet but did not significantly affect wool quality. It was concluded that supplements containing MHA could be economically fed to housed superfine Merino wethers ('Sharlea'), but MHA appears to be relatively inefficient in supplying methionine to the intestines.

Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 3. Cottonseed meal and hydroxymethyl-methionine

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 699 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Design Experiment ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

In experiment 1 six groups, each of 10 superfine Merino wethers were individually penned indoors and hand-fed chopped lucerne hay with either control pellets, cottonseed meal pellets (CSM) or cottonseed meal plus hydroxymethyl-methionine pellets (CSMEP). Following their shearing, the 6 groups in experiment 2 were hand-fed 1 of 3 chopped lucerne hay:oat rations [75: 25,50: 50,25: 75% (w/w)]. Each sheep was also fed either control pellets (25 g/day) or CSMEP pellets (75 g/day) in a cross-over design experiment. In both experiments, the rations were fed at maintenance level and were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa. In experiments 1 and 2, wool production was measured during a 4 and 6 month period respectively. In experiment 1, defaunation resulted in a 6% increase in clean wool production on the unsupplemented chopped lucerne hay ration. Inclusion of CSM and CSMEP pellets resulted in clean wool growth responses of 16% and 19% respectively. Unacceptable increases in fibre diameter were associated with the increased wool production. In experiment 2, the clean wool response to defaunation was highest (12%) on the 75% chopped lucerne hay ration, when the control pellet was fed. Inclusion of the CSMEP pellet resulted in clean wool growth responses of 0.73, 0.98 and 0.99 g/day in sheep fed on the 75,50 and 25% chopped lucerne hay rations respectively. The wool production responses due to the CSMEP pellet were associated with increases in fibre diameter (0.3 �m), length (4 mm/year) and length/diameter ratio (0.4 �m/day.�m) of the wool grown. It was concluded that CSMEP pellets are best fed with a mixed ration containing more grain than chopped lucerne hay. The wool growth response to feeding hydroxymethyl-methionine was considered uneconomic.

Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 2. Methionine and protected methionine

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Previous Trial ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Protein Diets ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

In experiment 1, 6 groups, each of 10 superfine Merino wethers, were individually penned indoors and hand-fed oats, wheat straw and whole lupins, either alone or with 2 g/day of DL-methionine or 6.6 g/day of fatty acid coated methionine (Ketionin) for 23 weeks. Following shearing the 6 groups were hand-fed lucerne-chopped hay in experiment 2 either alone or with hydroxymethyl-methionine (Mepron) or Ketionin for 23 weeks. In both experiments the rations were fed at maintenance level and were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa following treatment in a previous trial. In experiment 1, defaunated sheep produced an additional 6.5%clean wool on the supplemented oats plus lupins rations. Inclusion of Ketionin in the ration of defaunated sheep resulted in an 11% increase in clean wool growth, without affecting wool quality. In experiment 2 defaunated sheep produced an additional 6% clean wool on the lucerne-chopped hay ration. No responses to defaunation occurred on the supplemented rations. Inclusion of both forms of protected methionine in the ration (providing 2 g methionine/sheep.day) resulted in 23% and 13% higher clean wool production in the faunated and defaunated sheep respectively. Fibre diameter of wool was increased by 0.7 pm in sheep receiving Mepron and 0-5 pm in sheep receiving Ketionin. The wool grown by suppiemented sheep remained suitable for the 'Sharlea' trade (< 17.5 �m). It is concluded that wool growth responds more to defaunation on high energy-low protein diets. Wool growth responses to supplementation with protected methionine were greater on 100% roughage diets than on high grain diets. Further study is needed before an optimal ration for superfine wool production is formulated.

Liveweight and wool growth responses to a Mediterranean environment in three strains of Merino sheep

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Adams ◽  
J. R. Briegel
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Mediterranean Environment ◽  
Protein Loss ◽  
Broad Group ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Sources Of Variation

The present study examined changes in wool growth, liveweight, and body composition in groups of fine, medium, and broad wool Merino wethers grazed together at pasture in the highly seasonal Mediterranean environment, to determine the sources of variation in wool growth that may affect staple strength (SS). Seasonal changes in wool growth were measured using 6 dyebands placed at times of seasonal change in the nutrient supply from pasture, and liveweights were recorded fortnightly. Dilution of deuterated water was used to determine changes in body composition between the beginning of summer and the end of autumn. The sheep lost liveweight over this period, but loss of protein relative to fat over this period was unexpectedly high (7 : 1). The relative changes in liveweight, and loss of its components (fat and lean) during summer and autumn, were similar in all 3 groups, even though the Broad group was heavier than the other 2 genotypes at all times (P < 0·01). In contrast to the similar pattern of liveweight change, wool growth rates and changes in the fibre diameter were less variable throughout the year in the Broad group than the other 2 groups (P < 0·001). Stepwise regression indicated that the characteristics related to SS were standard deviation in fibre diameter (SDfd; P < 0·001), mean fibre diameter (P < 0·001), and variation in diameter within a 200-mm length of wool fibre (Sdfdwithin; P < 0·05). However, the relative importance of different factors for SS differed within each group. The most important factors were mean fibre diameter in the Fine group, the variation in fibre diameter along the staple (SDfdalong) in the Medium group, and the variation in diameter between fibres (SDfdbetween) in the Broad group. It is concluded that SS is a complex characteristic, depending on both the fibre diameter and several sources of variation in fibre diameter, all of which can differ among flocks. Protein loss made a disproportionate contribution to liveweight loss over summer and autumn, but the amino acids made available did not contribute substantially to wool growth or SS.

Assessing Wiltshire Horn-Merino crosses. 1. Wool shedding, blowfly strike and wool production traits

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 717 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Rathie ◽  
ML Tierney ◽  
JC Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Production Traits ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Phenotypic Correlations ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Head Neck

Wiltshire Horn-Merino (WH-M) crosses of 1/2, 5/8 and 3/4 Merino content were compared over 10 years for wool shedding, blowfly strike frequency and wool production traits. Merinos and 1/2 Merino WH-M were compared over 4 years. For wool production traits, 1/2 and 5/8 Merino WH-M ewes were compared to Border Leicester-Merino (BL-M) ewes over 2 years. Shedding increased with age for all WH-M genotypes, with 3/4 Merinos showing less shedding than 1/2 Merinos at all ages. At 1 and 2 years of age, 5/8 Merinos were intermediate between the other 2 WH-M genotypes, but at later ages they were similar to 1/2 Merinos. All genotypes showed less shedding at the belly site than the head, neck and breech as lambs, but not at older ages. Phenotypic correlations between sites on the same sheep were high, averaging 0.85. Repeatability estimates for each site ranged from 0.26 to 0.45. Shedding increased most with age in the 1/2 Merinos, and least in the 3/4 Merinos. Little or no shoulder and back wool was shed by most sheep. All 1/2 and 5/8 Merinos and most 3/4 Merinos had bare legs and points. Blowfly strike incidence was far higher in Merinos than 1/2 Merinos, in all years. Among WH-M, blowfly strike incidence increased as Merino content increased, in all years. All WH-M were far inferior to both Merinos and BL-M in total greasy wool weight and all its components, and also in clean fleece weight, with their level of inferiority increasing as their Merino content declined. Wool fibre diameter for all WH-M was coarser than for Merinos, but was a little finer than for BL-M. Fibre diameter increased in the WH-M as their Merino content declined. All WH-M had lower wool yields than the Merinos or BL-M. In some years the 314 Merinos had lower wool yields than the 1/2 and 5/8 Merinos, which were similar in all years. Shedding caused numerous genotype x age interactions in wool weight and its components, as Merinos and BL-M did not shed, and with the WH-M shedding increased most with age in the 1/2 Merinos, and least in the 3/4 Merinos. Due to preferential shedding from the belly and other low-value areas, the WH-M inferiority in total wool weight was less severe for fleece weight. Winter shearing succeeded in harvesting some wool from WH-M that would be shed before a summer shearing, but not enough to alter rankings among genotypes. All WH-M genotypes have wool too coarse, and not enough of it, to compete as a wool sheep with the Merino at current wool prices under usual Australian pastoral conditions. In areas where mustering is difficult or blowfly strike unusually severe, WH-M genotypes may find a niche.

Wool production and heterosis by the Merino, the Polwarth, and their reciprocal crosses

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 397 ◽  
Author(s):  
LG Butler ◽  
BJ Horton ◽  
PM Williams ◽  
RG Banks
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Effect ◽  
Reciprocal Cross ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Or Efficiency ◽  
Weaning Weight ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Lower Production

Tasmanian Merinos and Polwarths were mated in each of 2 years to produce 2 drops of Merino, Polwarth, and F1 reciprocal cross progeny. Polwarths had weaning weights similar to Merinos but were 14% heavier as hoggets. Polwarths grew a similar amount of wool of 11% greater (P<0.001) fibre diameter; however, wool production was 9% less efficient based on metabolic weight. Polwarths displayed an advantage in resistance to footrot. There was a marked Polwarth maternal effect of about 16% on weaning weight but no elfect on hogget weight. The Polwarth maternal effect on fleece weight and efficiency was 9% (P<0.001). In a comparison with a single-born male, ewes weighed 5% less at weaning and 7% less at hogget shearing and produced about 6% less wool (P<0.001), although of comparable fibre diameter. Twins weighed 17% less at weaning, but only 3% less at hogget shearing (P<0.001). They grew about 5% less wool, which was of 2% greater fibre diameter (P<0.001) and 5% higher wool score, but efficiency was 2.5% lower. Production was generally lower (except for yield and wool score) in the 1988 drop than the 1987 drop by 3-10%. Differences in productivity between ram sources were of only slightly lesser magnitude than differences between breeds. The number of feet affected by footrot was reduced by 17% in the 1988 drop. Severe footrot affecting more than 1 foot reduced liveweight but did not significantly reduce fleece weight. There appeared to be some heterosis for weaning weight (10%) and hogget weight (6%), but little heterosis in wool growth (2-3%) or efficiency (-2%).

Effects on wool production during pregnancy and lactation of twice daily abomasal supplementation with casein or methionine and cystine

1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (90) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Williams ◽  
RN Tyrrell ◽  
AR Gilmour
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Early Lactation ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Pregnancy And Lactation ◽  
Sulphur Amino Acids ◽  
Sorghum Grain

The responses in wool production of Merino ewes to abomasal supplements of casein (56 g day-1) and of a mixture of methionine and cystine were measured during late pregnancy and early lactation. The mixed supplement provided equal quantities of the sulphur amino acids as the casein. The ewes were offered sufficient quantities of a diet of sorghum grain/lucerne hay (in the ratio 7 : 3 by weight) to maintain maternal liveweight. During the final four weeks of pregnancy and the first six weeks of lactation, the cassin supplement increased wool growth (826 vs. 639 g cm-2 day-1). A similar response was observed for fibre diameter (1 9.7 vs. 18.5 pm : P < 0.05). Wool production and fibre diameter did not differ between the ewes supplemented with methionine and cystine and the control ewes during this same period. The ewes supplemented with methionine and cystine produced wool with the greatest sulphur content, and this trait was least in the wool from the control ewes (3.84 vs. 3.64 vs. 3.49: P < 0.05). We concluded that the availability of the sulphur amino acids was not primarily limiting wool production in pregnant/lactating ewes.

Factors differentiating between high and low wool producing sheep in western Queensland

1992 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1367
Author(s):  
DA Pritchard ◽  
PK O'Rourke
Keyword(s):  
Linear Growth ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Unit Surface Area ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Pasture Quality ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Commercial Flock

Four experiments were carried out to examine factors which may influence the phenotypic expression of wool growth. High wool producing sheep (HPS) and low wool producing sheep (LPS) were selected from a commercial flock and studied under grazing and controlled feeding conditions. Results are discussed in relation to management of HPS for increased wool production. In the paddock experiment, advantages to HPS in wool growth per unit surface area were least (7%) when pasture quality was low (11 g N/kg DM) and greatest (20%) when pasture quality was best (21 g N/kg DM). Despite the greater live weight of HPS compared with LPS (16%), the HPS produced 25% more clean wool per unit of live weight. Daily clean wool production was always greater in HPS than in LPS. Values ranged from 9.1 v. 7.5 g/day to 15.1 v. 11.6 g/day. During the period following the peak in nitrogen content of the pasture, HPS produced a greater volume of fibre than LPS (194 v. 167 8m3/dayx103), this difference being primarily associated with the greater fibre diameter of wool from HPS (25.4 v. 24.6 8m). In pen experiment 1, the efficiency of conversion of feed to wool was determined under controlled feeding conditions. Differences in wool growth between HPS and LPS at maintenance (M) and above maintenance (M+) were 21% and 49% respectively. Relative efficiency of conversion of feed to wool was 5% higher for HPS during the period immediately following the change in ration and greatest (38-48%) after sheep had made liveweight gains. Wool growth differences between HPS and LPS in pen experiment 2 could not be attributed to either differences in follicle density (66 v. 64 follicles/mm2) or the ratio of secondary to primary follicles (24 : 1 v. 22 : 1). The efficiency of retention of apparently absorbed nitrogen was similar (21.4 v. 20.8%) for HPS and LPS at below maintenance (M-) but differed at M-t (26.8 v. 11.7%). Rumen dry matter turnover time at M- was faster in HPS than in LPS (29.8 v. 38.4 h) but similar at M+ (30.4 v. 34.4 h). At M-, volumetric fibre production of HPS increased from 79 to 106 ,8m3/dayx 103 and from 59 to 75 ,8m3/day x103 for LPS following the subcutaneous administration of the sulfur containing amino acid methionine. These increases were associated with increases in both fibre diameter (1.5 8m) and fibre linear growth (42 8m/day) in HPS, but only linear growth (52 ,8m/day) in LPS. At M+, when basal wool growth was high, there was little increase in wool growth by either group following supplementary methionine. Wool growth responses to methionine were 25 and 19% for HPS and LPS respectively at M+ in pen experiment 3.

The effect of previous and current nutrition on wool production in southern Victoria

1962 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Sharkey ◽  
IF Davis ◽  
PA Kenney
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Fibre Length ◽  
Initial Increase ◽  
Nutritional Treatment ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Autumn And Winter

The effect of different planes of nutrition on the wool production of Corriedale wethers at pasture was studied between August 1959 and December 1960. The plane of nutrition was controlled by rate of stocking. The effect of previous nutritional treatment on wool production was slight. It affected wool weight and fibre length for 160 one month and fibre diameter for two months. The differences in current nutritional treatment were accompanied by large differences in wool production except during the spring months. On the highest plane of nutrition the wool production showed little seasonal variation, apart from an initial increase in production during the autumn. On the medium and low planes of nutrition wool growth declined substantially in autumn and winter and increased again in spring. The mean fibre diameter of the wool that was clipped frequently was greater than that of fleece wool obtained from the opposite midside at shearing. Further, in the groups on medium and low planes of nutrition estimates of fleece weight based on the combined weight of periodical clippings were greater than actual fleece weights. It is concluded that, in the dry Victorian summer, wool production is influenced by the plane of nutrition in the previous spring for a short period only, and that in autumn and winter it is dependant almost entirely on the feed immediately available.

Lupinosis and reproduction reduce the wool growth of Merino ewes

1997 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Barnes ◽  
K. P. Croker ◽  
J. G. Allen ◽  
N. D. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase ◽  
Subcutaneous Injections ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Weight Yield ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Glutamyl Transferase ◽  
The Impact

Summary. Lupinosis was induced in Merino ewes by subcutaneous injections of phomopsins. Liver damage and impairment of liver function was measured by increases in plasma activities of glutamate dehydrogenase and gamma glutamyl transferase, plasma concentrations of bilirubin, and plasma clearance of bromosulfthalein. The wool growth of the ewes during and after exposure to phomopsins at different periods relative to mating was measured, and the impact of lupinosis on annual wool production assessed. Phomopsin administration decreased the length of staple grown during, and for at least 6 weeks after, exposure to phomopsins. Mean fibre diameter of wool grown during this time was also reduced. Annual wool production of the ewes was affected by exposure to phomopsins, with effects noted on fleece weight, yield, fibre diameter, strength and position of break. These effects were minor and varied between experiments. The adverse effects of reproduction on annual wool production were more significant than those of phomopsins.

Wool growth responses to DL-methionine administration and factors affecting the value of supplementation

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 471 ◽  
Author(s):  
RGA Stephenson ◽  
GR Suter ◽  
CJ Howitt
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Rhodes Grass ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Net Return ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Treatment Analysis ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
The Cost

Wool growth responses to methionine administration were assessed using Peppin Merino wethers on various planes of nutrition. In experiment 1, sheep were fed 700 g/day of lucerne pellets to maintain liveweight. DL-methionine (5.8 g) administered subcutaneously resulted in 0.29 mg/cm2.day (36%) more wool (P<0.01) and a 2.5 �m (15.2%) increase in fibre diameter (P<0.05). In experiment 2, two levels (700 and 1400 g/day) of lucerne pellets were offered, with and without methionine administered subcutaneously (5.8 g). Main treatment analysis indicated a significant (P<0.01) effect of nutrition on wool growth and fibre diameter, with no effect of methionine, except for a reduction (P<0.05) in liveweight gain. Methionine administration was associated with a non-significant increase (39%) in wool growth for the 700 g diet and no change for the 1400 g diet. In experiment 3, two levels (1.75 and 2.5 g/day) of methionine were infused (4 h daily) when sheep were fed a submaintenance ration of Rhodes grass chaff, supplemented with nitrogen and sulfur. Significant (P<0.05) wool growth responses at both levels of methionine infusion were similar, with absolute (0.21 and 0.23 mg/cm2.day) and percentage (52 and 58%) increases for 1.75 and 2.5 g/day methionine treatments, respectively. Methionine administration only increased wool production at nutritional levels of liveweight maintenance or below when wool growth values for control treatments were 0.63,0.59 and 0.40 mg/cm2.day for experiments 1, 2 and 3. Fibre diameters of sheep in untreated groups were 16.4 and 18.8 pm for experiments 1 and 2. These wool growth and fibre diameter values are 25-40% below what might be expected for this strain of Merino. The values of positive correlations between wool growth and fibre diameter were increased with increased nutrition and the administration of methionine in experiment 2. This result and the nil response at high basal wool growth, together with the low potential net return on the cost of methionine, suggest that the use of methionine could be unprofitable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document