Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry predicts the effects of dietary protein on body composition of pigs

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suster ◽  
B. J. Leury ◽  
D. J. Kerton ◽  
F. R. Dunshea

The present study investigated the potential of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine the effect of dietary protein on live pig body composition compared with the standard methods. The experiment utilised 48 Large White × Landrace gilts, stratified on liveweight at 17 weeks of age (initial liveweight about 60 kg), and allocated within strata to diets containing either 85 or 100% of dietary protein requirements. The diets were fed ad libitum and contained 14.6 or 16.7% protein, respectively. Pigs were housed individually to allow weekly measurement of feed intake and liveweight. A Hologic QDR4500A dual energy X-ray absorptiometer was used to determine lean, fat and ash composition of pigs initially and 4 weeks later at the end of the experiment. Daily gain was increased by about 200 g in pigs fed the protein-adequate diet, but feed intake was not affected. Therefore, pigs fed adequate protein had a lower feed conversion ratio (2.92 v. 3.52 g/g, P<0.001). Feeding the protein-adequate diet increased lean deposition by about 150 g/day (577 v. 429 g/day, P<0.001) and ash deposition by about 4 g/day (28.7 v. 25.0 g/day, P<0.001), but did not affect fat accretion. This resulted in carcasses with a higher lean content (54.0 v. 50.7 kg, P<0.001) and ash content (2.35 v. 2.28 kg, P<0.05) but unaltered fat content. Therefore, an inadequate level of dietary protein leads to suboptimal growth in lean tissue and bone mineral, with no pronounced effect on fat. These observations were substantiated by chemical analysis and available corrective equations were useful in correcting differences between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry outputs and chemical values. After correction, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry estimates differed less than 5% from the chemical values for lean, protein, water and ash and 10% for lipid. In addition, reduced standard error of the differences around most dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements, relative to chemical analysis, allowed small changes in body composition to be detected with increased confidence. These data support the efficacy of using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in nutritional studies of pigs.

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 683 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suster ◽  
B. J. Leury ◽  
R. Hewitt ◽  
D. J. Kerton ◽  
F. R. Dunshea

The present study was designed to determine whether porcine somatotropin (pST) reduces whole animal and belly fat using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and manual dissection. The study utilised 24 Large White × Landrace gilts selected at 16 weeks of age with an approximate liveweight of 80 kg and housed in individual pens. Gilts were stratified on liveweight into 8 blocks and 1 pig from each block was assigned to either 0, 5 or 10 mg per day of pST. Pigs were fed ad libitum a wheat-based diet containing 200 g crude protein, 10.2 g available lysine and 14.6 MJ DE/kg, to ensure that responses to pST were expressed. Feed intake and liveweight were measured on a weekly basis. An Hologic QDR4500A dual energy X-ray absorptiometer was used to determine lean, fat and ash composition of pigs initially and again 4 weeks later at the end of the experiment. After slaughter, the composition of the whole half carcass as well as the shoulder, ham, belly and loin primal cuts was determined with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and verified with manual dissection. Daily pST treatment decreased feed intake (3440, 2710 and 2537 g/day for 0, 5 or 10 mg pST per day, respectively; P<0.001) and decreased feed conversion ratio (2.95, 2.18 and 2.03 g/g; P<0.001) even though there was no significant effect on daily gain. Pigs treated with pST deposited more lean tissue (620, 839 and 873 g/day; P<0.05) and less fat (384, 218 and 176 g/day; P<0.001) than control animals, but there was no effect of pST on ash deposition. As a consequence, pigs treated with 5 and 10 mg pST/day contained 5 and 9 kg less dissectible fat than control gilts, respectively. A dose dependent decrease in belly, loin, ham and shoulder fat was also observed, although the decrease in belly fat was more pronounced than for the whole carcass and other primal cuts. Overall, pST treatment has the potential to decrease carcass and especially belly fat in pigs and increase consumer acceptance of pork in markets that place a premium on carcass fat and lean yield in the belly region. The results determined with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were confirmed by manual dissection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
P. A. LeeHong ◽  
X. Li ◽  
W. L. Bryden ◽  
L. C. Ward

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a non-invasive technology for measurement of body composition that requires validation against reference methods when applied to a new species. The aim of this work was to validate DXA for the assessment of body composition of the echidna. Body composition was determined in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus aculeatus) using a Norland XR36 DXA scanner and validated by proximate chemical analysis for dry matter, ash, crude fat (FM) and protein (as 6.25 × N) and bone mineral content (BMC). Echidnas were opportunistically obtained as ‘road kill’. Body composition data were compared between techniques by correlation and limits of agreement (LOA) analyses. Twenty-eight echidnas (11 males, 13 females, 4 not determined), weighing 520–5517 g, underwent analyses. Mean FM was 489.9 ± 439.5 g and 448.5 ± 337.5 g, lean mass was 2276.0 ± 1021.4 g and 2256.0 ± 1026.0 g, fat-free mass was 2356.3 ± 1055.1 g and 2389.5 ± 1081.1 g and BMC was 80.3 ± 39.5 g and 79.9 ± 42.4 g by DXA and chemical analysis, respectively. The two methods were highly correlated (0.84 to 0.99) and not significantly different, although LOA were large. DXA has the potential to be used to assess body composition of echidnas although further work is required to improve accuracy of measurement.


1998 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbra S. Rose ◽  
William P. Flatt ◽  
Roy J. Martin ◽  
Richard D. Lewis

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1432.2-1432
Author(s):  
N. Toroptsova ◽  
O. Dobrovolskaya ◽  
N. Demin ◽  
L. Shornikova

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex inflammatory disease that modifies body composition. Using the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in RA patients could be a method for body composition changes detection.Objectives:To study the body composition using DXA in patients with RA.Methods:The study involved 79 women with RA, median age 60 [55; 65] years. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry using «Discovery A» (Hologic, USA). Assessment of body composition was carried out, using the program «Whole body». Sarcopenia (SP) was diagnosed as a decrease in appendicular mass index (AMI) <6.0 kg/m2. Osteoporosis (OP) was diagnosed as a decrease in T-score <-2.5 SD. Osteosarcopenia was determined when T-score was <-1.0 SD, AMI was <6.0 kg/m2, osteosarcopenic obesity - T-score was <-1.0 SD, AMI was <6.0 kg/m2and total fat was >35%.Results:The mean duration of RA was 9 [3; 11] years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.6±4.8 kg/m2. Disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 4.5±1.3 points for the group. 39 (49.3%) patients used oral glucocorticoids continuously. Appendicular muscle mass and AMI were on average 17.8±3.0 kg and 6.8±1.0 kg/m2, respectively. AMI <6 kg/m2was detected in 20 (25.3%) patients. 56 (70.9%) women with RA had total fat > 35%, while only 22 (27.8%) of women with RA had obesity according to BMI (BMI >30 kg/m2). Isolated OP was found in 13 (16.5%), osteosarcopenia in 7 (8.9%) and osteosarcopenic obesity in 13 (16.5%) patients RA. No cases with isolated sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity were detected. Only 3 (3.8%) patients did not have appendicular muscle mass, AMI and BMD decrease and overfat or obesity.Conclusion:About 97% women with RA had abnormal body composition phenotype: 16,5% - OP, 8.9% -osteosarcopenia, 16,5% - osteosarcopenic obesity and 54,4% - overfat.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document