Effects of supplement grain type and level of feeding on the milk production of early-lactation Holstein - Friesian cows grazing temperate and tropical pastures

2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 735 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Granzin
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Lolium Multiflorum ◽  
Starch Digestibility ◽  
Tropical Pastures ◽  
Neutral Detergent Fibre ◽  
Organic Matter Digestibility

Two experiments were undertaken to examine the effects of supplement grain type (barley v. maize) and level of feeding [4.5 v. 8.1 kg dry matter (DM)/cow.day] on the milk production, nutrient intake and rumen fermentation of cows grazing swards of biennial ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. Concord), prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii cv. Matua) (expt 1) or kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum cv. Common) (expt 2). There were no interactions (P>0.05) between grain type and level of feeding (G × L) on milk production, liveweight change or condition score in either experiment. When the main effects were examined, feeding maize as opposed to barley resulted in higher milk protein concentrations (P = 0.001) in both experiments (2.96 v. 2.83% and 2.91 v. 2.71% for expts 1 and 2, respectively), higher milk fat concentration (P = 0.001; 3.85 v. 3.36%) and daily milk fat yield per cow (P = 0.029; 875 v. 791 g) in experiment 1, and higher daily yield (P = 0.004) of milk protein in experiment 2 (618 v. 578 g). In both experiments, feeding increased supplement resulted in higher (P<0.05) daily yields per cow of milk (24.1 v. 22.0 L and 23.6 v. 20.1 L for expts 1 and 2, respectively) and milk protein (703 v. 637 g and 646 v. 550 g for expts 1 and 2, respectively), and lower (P<0.05) milk fat concentrations (3.46 v. 3.76% and 3.25 v. 3.57% for expts 1 and 2, respectively). In both experiments, there were no G × L interactions (P>0.05) on pasture intake, neutral detergent fibre digestibility or rumen concentrations of ammonia or volatile fatty acids. There were G × L interactions on organic matter digestibility (P = 0.019) in experiment 1 and on starch digestibility (P = 0.003) in experiment 2, with cows fed 4.5 kg DM/day of barley having higher organic matter digestibility, and cows fed either level of barley having higher starch digestibility. In both experiments, feeding more supplement reduced (P>0.05) daily pasture intake per cow (13.3 v. 11.3 kg DM and 9.9 v. 8.3 kg DM for expts 1 and 2, respectively). Feeding barley rather than maize caused higher starch digestibility (P = 0.006) in experiment 1 (93.0 v. 89.8%), and higher organic matter digestibility (P = 0.021) and neutral detergent fibre digestibility (P = 0.009) in experiment 2 (70.8 v. 69.3% and 62.9 v. 59.7%, for organic matter digestibility and neutral detergent fibre digestibility, respectively). Feeding maize rather than barley reduced (P = 0.034) rumen molar proportion of butyrate (16.1 v. 17.6 mol %) in experiment 1. These experiments show that feeding supplements based on maize, as opposed to barley can: increase the milk fat concentration and yield of cows grazing temperate pastures; increase the milk protein yield of cows grazing tropical pastures; and increase the milk protein concentration of cows grazing either temperate or tropical pastures.

A comparison of the effects of cracked wheat and sodium hydroxide-treated wheat on food intake, milk production and rumen digestion in dairy cows given maize silage diets

2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Phipps ◽  
J. D. Sutton ◽  
D. J. Humphries ◽  
A. K. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Sodium Hydroxide ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Maize Silage ◽  
Dietary Regimen

AbstractTo examine the effects of manipulating the amount and ruminal degradability of starch on food intake, milk production and digestion in the rumen of lactating dairy cows, cracked wheat (CW) and sodium hydroxide-treated wheat (SW) were compared when offered with either immature (IM) or mature (MM) maize silage given in a 3: 1 dry matter (DM) ratio with grass silage. The total mixed ration (TMR) contained (kg/t DM basis) forage 600, wheat (CW or SW) 170, rapeseed meal 100, soya-bean meal 100, molasses/urea supplement 30 and minerals and vitamins were added at 20 kg/t diet DM. In experiments 1 and 2 respectively, 16 multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows and four similar cows with duodenal and ruminal cannulas were offered four diets (IMCW, IMSW, MMCW, MMSW) in 4 ✕ 4 Latin-square designs. In experiment 3, the in sacco degradability of CW and SW was measured in the rumen of three lactating fistulated cows. In experiment 1 total DM intake was 0·7 kg/day higher and milk yield was 0·5 kg/day higher with MM than IM silage but the increases were not significant and type of wheat had no effect. Milk fat content was reduced by MM silage (P < 0·05) but was unaffected by type of wheat. For milk protein content SW caused a non-significant increase with IM but a decrease (P < 0·05) with MM silage (interaction P < 0·05). There were no significant effects on yield of fat or protein. Neutral-detergent fibre digestibility in the rumen was unaffected by the treatments. Starch intake increased (P < 0·05) with MM silage when compared with IM silage and was accompanied by an increase (P < 0·01) in starch flow to the duodenum and in the amount (P < 0·001) digested in the rumen, although there was no significant change in rumen digestibility. Replacing CW with SW increased starch flow to the duodenum (P < 0·05) and reduced rumen digestibility (P < 0·05). Although the amount of total nitrogen (TN) digested in the rumen and rumen digestibility decreased (P < 0·01) with crop maturity, the flow of TN and non-ammonia nitrogen to the duodenum was unaffected. Total tract digestibility of DM was unaffected by treatments. Although the amount of starch digested in the total tract increased for MM compared with IM silage, reflecting the higher starch intake, total tract starch digestibility was unaffected by treatment and averaged 0·972. There were no main treatment effects on daily mean pH, concentration of ammonia or concentration or molar proportions of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. With SW, effective degradability (outflow rate of 0·08 per h) for both DM and starch was reduced when compared with CW. In conclusion the studies confirm that SW is more slowly fermented than CW and can increase the supply of starch to the duodenum. However the concept that increasing starch supply to the duodenum by a combination of MM silage and SW is likely to be beneficial to milk protein yield or concentration is not established under the present dietary regimen.

scholarly journals Identification of the Potential Role of the Rumen Microbiome in Milk Protein and Fat Synthesis in Dairy Cows Using Metagenomic Sequencing

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1247
Author(s):  
Xin Wu ◽  
Shuai Huang ◽  
Jinfeng Huang ◽  
Peng Peng ◽  
Yanan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Rumen Fluid ◽  
Abundant Species ◽  
Metagenomic Sequencing ◽  
Amino Acid Synthesis ◽  
Prevotella Species

The rumen contains abundant microorganisms that aid in the digestion of lignocellulosic feed and are associated with host phenotype traits. Cows with extremely high milk protein and fat percentages (HPF; n = 3) and low milk protein and fat percentages (LPF; n = 3) were selected from 4000 lactating Holstein cows under the same nutritional and management conditions. We found that the total concentration of volatile fatty acids, acetate, butyrate, and propionate in the rumen fluid was significantly higher in the HPF group than in the LPF group. Moreover, we identified 38 most abundant species displaying differential richness between the two groups, in which Prevotella accounted for 68.8% of the species, with the highest abundance in the HPF group. Functional annotation based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome (KEGG), evolutionary genealogy of genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups (eggNOG), and Carbohydrate-Active enzymes (CAZy) databases showed that the significantly more abundant species in the HPF group are enriched in carbohydrate, amino acid, pyruvate, insulin, and lipid metabolism and transportation. Furthermore, Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed that specific microbial taxa (mainly the Prevotella species and Neocallimastix californiae) are positively correlated with total volatile fatty acids (VFA). Collectively, we found that the HPF group was enriched with several Prevotella species related to the total VFA, acetate, and amino acid synthesis. Thereby, these fulfilled the host’s needs for energy, fat, and rumen microbial protein, which can be used for increased biosynthesis of milk fat and milk protein. Our findings provide novel information for elucidation of the regulatory mechanism of the rumen in the formation of milk composition.

Replacing wheat with canola meal and maize grain in the diet of lactating dairy cows: Feed intake, milk production and cow condition responses

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruairi P McDonnell ◽  
Martin vH Staines
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Canola Meal ◽  
Grass Silage ◽  
Holstein Friesian ◽  
Maize Grain ◽  
The Difference

This research paper describes the effect of partially replacing wheat with maize grain and canola meal on milk production and body condition changes in early lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cows consuming a grass silage-based diet over an 83-d period. Two groups of 39 cows were stratified for age, parity, historical milk yield and days in milk (DIM), and offered one of two treatment diets. The first treatment (CON) reflected a typical diet used by Western Australian dairy producers in summer and comprised (kg DM/cow per d); 8 kg of annual ryegrass silage, 6 kg of crushed wheat (provided once daily in a mixed ration), 3·6 kg of crushed lupins (provided in the milking parlour in two daily portions) and ad libitum lucerne haylage. The second treatment diet (COMP) was identical except the 6 kg of crushed wheat was replaced by 6 kg of a more complex concentrate mix (27% crushed wheat, 34% maize grain and 37% canola meal). Lucerne haylage was provided independently in the paddock to all cows, and no pasture was available throughout the experiment. The COMP group had a greater mean overall daily intake (22·5vs20·4 kg DM/cow) and a higher energy corrected milk (ECM) yield (29·2vs27·1 kg/cow;P= 0·047) than the CON cows. The difference in overall intake was caused by a higher daily intake of lucerne haylage in COMP cows (4·5vs2·3 kg DM/cow). The CON group had a higher concentration of milk fat (42·1vs39·3 g/kg;P= 0·029) than COMP cows. Milk protein yield was greater in COMP cows (P< 0·021); however, milk fat yield was unaffected by treatment. It is concluded that partially replacing wheat with canola meal and maize grain in a grass silage-based diet increases voluntary DMI of conserved forage and consequently yields of ECM and milk protein.

Production responses of dairy cows grazing well-managed kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures to energy and protein supplementation

1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 763 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Reeves ◽  
WJ Fulkerson ◽  
RC Kellaway
Keyword(s):  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Protein Supplementation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Plasma Urea ◽  
Pennisetum Clandestinum ◽  
Cereal Grain ◽  
Metabolisable Energy ◽  
Production Response

Three studies were conducted to examine the production response of Friesian cows grazing well-managed lukuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pasture to supplementation with a cereal grain concentrate, with and without the inclusion of formaldehyde-treated protein meal. Mean (¦ s.e.) levels of nutrients in the pasture (g/kg DM) on offer were: 205 ¦ 3 crude protein; 683 ¦ 7 in vitro organic matter digestibility; 239 ¦ 2 acid detergent fibre; 615 ¦ 8 neutral detergent fibre and 4.47 ¦ 0.16, 2.51 ¦ 0.06, 31.96 ¦ 0.98, 0.39 ¦ 0.03 and 3.18 ¦ 0.09 of calcium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and magnesium, respectively. Study 1 was a 3-farmlet study conducted over 45 days (March-April 1993) involving cows 5-6 months into lactation, which compared 3 levels of concentrate feeding at 0 (R0), 3 (R3) or 6 (R6) kg crushed barley/cow.day. Study 2 was an 18-day extension of study 1 with animals in the seventh month of lactation. The concentrate fed was 72% barley and 24% formaldehyde-treated sunflower meal. Pasture intake of individual cows was determined using an alkane technique. Mean milk yields (L/cow. day) in study 1 were 14.2, 18.3 and 18.0, and in study 2 were 12.5, 18.5 and 17.4 for treatments R0, R3 and R6, respectively. Milk fat (3.77 v. 3.26%), but not milk protein, content of the Ro cows was significantly higher than R6 cows in study 1 only. In study 2, the apparent whole-diet digestibility remained constant as concentrate level rose, indicating a negative effect of concentrate fed on forage digestibility in the absence of buffers. Study 3 was a 3 x 4 factorial design plus a 'control' group (0.5 kg barley/cow.day used as a carrier for minerals) to examine the milk production response to 3 levels of concentrate feeding (3, 6 and 9 kg/cow.day) with 4 levels of formaldehyde-treated canola meal (FTCM; 0, 20, 40 and 60% of concentrate). Rations were iso-energetic within levels of concentrates fed. The control group had significantly lower milk production (17.2 L/cow.day), as well as milk protein (2.90%), plasma urea (PU) (5.90 mmol/L) and P-hydroxybutyrate (G-OHB) (0.525 mmo1L) than other treatment groups. The mean milk production response of 0.6 L milk/kg concentrate fed in study 3 at the 3 kg/day level of feeding was lower than observed in studies 1 and 2 (1.4 and 2.0 L/kg concentrate, respectively). The level of metabolisable energy in the concentrate in study 3 had a significant influence on milk production, milk fat and milk protein levels. Plasma glucose and G-OHB levels significantly increased with the incorporation of FTCM into the concentrate. Nonesterified fatty acid levels dropped significantly below levels of other treatments at the lowest level of inclusion of FTCM. PU levels generally increased in response to increasing metabolisable energy and inclusion of FTCM in the concentrate, with an interaction between them. Milk urea (MU) levels (mmol/L) showed a significant linear (P<0.001; r2 = 0.44) relationship to PU levels (mmol/L) as follows: MU = 0.167 + 0.272PU.

The efficacy of feeding a live probiotic yeast, Yea-Sacc®, on the performance of lactating dairy cows

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Tristant ◽  
C. A. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Feed Additive ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
Lactating Dairy Cows ◽  
Farm Model ◽  
The Impact

SummaryThe following trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of feeding Yea-Sacc® (YS; Alltech Inc, USA), a zootechnical feed additive based on a live probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to lactating dairy cows over a 12 week period. Sixty-four primiparous and multiparous Holstein dairy cows, grouped to give similar range of parity, physiological and milk production stages, were selected for the study. Cows were equally allocated to either a control feed group or a diet supplemented with YS (32 cows per treatment). The test diet was formulated to include YS (Yea-Sacc® Farm Pak) incorporated in the total mixed ration (TMR), supplying a target dose of 5 × 107 CFU/kg feed dry matter (DM). This target dose delivered 1 × 109 CFU/cow/day, for a cow consuming 20 kg feed (DM basis) daily. Each cow was considered a replicate unit. Cows were fed a nutritionally adequate total TMR plus hay and a supplementary protein/energy concentrate (calculated according to milk yield) for 12 weeks, supplied once a day after the morning milking. Weigh backs of feed were recorded daily, with refusals being maintained at 3% of the total intake. During the 12 week study period, YS had significant beneficial effects on milk production (+0.8 kg/day; P = 0.003), energy corrected milk production (+1.4 kg/day; P < 0.0001), synthesis of milk protein (+36 g/day; P = 0.001), milk protein content (+0.3 g/kg; P = 0.009), and milk urea content (−0.09 mg/l; P = 0.004). The synthesis of milk fat was similar between treatments but milk fat content was lower for the YS group compared to the control group (−1.1 g/kg; P = 0.0002). Lactose content was always higher (+0.8 g/kg; P < 0.0001) for the YS group, indicating enhanced energy utilisation. In general, the effect of YS was higher during the first study period (one to seven weeks), when cows were in early lactation and the production potential was higher. YS cows produced significantly more milk during the study, and an additional 220 kg milk per cow was sold from this group from the output measured from the beginning of the study to two weeks post-trial. However, the statistical analysis including the post-study period did not show a significant effect. The 305-day simulated milk production was higher for the YS group (+400 kg/cow) but again the difference was not significant. In conclusion, YS at a target dose of 5 × 107 CFU/kg DM improved milk production and milk quality in healthy dairy cows. In addition, when the data were included in a whole-farm model, feeding YS reduced methane emissions by 4%, reduced the number of animals required for the desired milk production by 4% and increased overall farm margins by 1.4%.

Effect of administration of rumen fungi on production performance of lactating buffaloes

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Saxena ◽  
J. Sehgal ◽  
A. Puniya ◽  
K. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Wheat Straw ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fungal Culture ◽  
Group I ◽  
Lactating Buffaloes ◽  
Group Ii

Anaerobic fungi were orally dosed to lactating buffaloes to study their effect on the digestibility of a diet (composed of 50% wheat straw and 50% concentrate along with six kg maize green/animal/day), rumen fermentation patterns and milk production. Group I (control) was administered with fungus-free anaerobic broth, while group II and III were administered with Orpinomyces sp. C-14 or Piromyces sp. WNG-12 (250 ml; 3-5 days of growth/animal/ week), respectively. Milk production was higher in group II and III (8.42 and 8.48 kg/d) than in the control (8.03 kg/d) with virtually the same feed intake (i.e. 11.50 and 10.62 and 11.79 kg, respectively). There was an increase of 6% fat-corrected milk yield/animal/day in group II and III, respectively compared to the control. The milk fat was higher in the fungal culture administered groups than in the control group. The digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, cellulose and digestible energy also increased significantly in group II and III. The pH and ammonia nitrogen were lower, whereas total volatile fatty acids, total nitrogen, trichloroacid precipitable nitrogen and number of zoospores/ml of rumen liquor were higher in group II and III when compared to the control. Hence, it can be stated that rumen fungi can be used as a direct-fed microbial in lactating buffaloes, to enhance the digestibility of wheat straw based diets leading to higher production.

Milk production by dairy cows fed legume grains or barley grain with or without urea as supplements to a cereal hay based diet

1990 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
SC Valentine ◽  
BD Bartsch
Keyword(s):  
Milk Production ◽  
Faba Bean ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Barley Grain ◽  
Early Lactation ◽  
Milk Protein Content ◽  
Holstein Friesian ◽  
Friesian Cows

Milk production and composition was determined in Holstein-Friesian cows fed either 3.5 or 7.0 kg dry matter (DM) daily of lupin grain, pea grain, faba bean grain or barley grain with or without 1.5% added urea, as supplements to an oaten hay based diet. All the grains were hammermilled. Daily yields of milk (L), fat (kg) and protein (kg) were significantly (P<0.05) higher for cows fed lupin (20.0, 0.81, 0.57), pea (18.9, 0.80, 0.56) and faba bean (18.9, 0.79,0.55) grains compared with those of cows fed barley grain with (17.8, 0.73, 0.51) or without (18.0, 0.71, 0.52) urea. Yields of milk (L), fat (kg) and protein (kg) and milk protein content (g/kg) were significantly (P<0.05) higher when 7.0 kg DM (19.5, 0.80, 0.57, 29.6) compared with 3.5 kg DM (18.0,0.73,0.51,29.0) of grain was fed. There were no significant differences between treatments in hay DM intake by cows fed 3.5 kg DM of grain daily. A significantly (P<0.05) higher milk fat production per unit DM intake was recorded for cows fed legume compared with barley grain. There were generally higher returns above grain cost for cows fed legume compared with barley grain and for cows fed 4 kg compared to 8 kg daily of grain. It was concluded that it was more economical to feed 3.5 kg DM of legume grain compared with 3.5 kg DM of barley grain, with or without urea, as supplements for cows offered cereal hay in early lactation. However, the economics of feeding 7.0 kg DM of legume grain compared with 7.0 kg DM of barley grain and 7.0 kg DM compared with 3.5 kg DM of grain will depend on the costs of relative changes in hay intake associated with these practices.

scholarly journals Influence of Body Condition Score on Milk Production Parameters of Murrah Buffaloes

2020 ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Anitha Alapati ◽  
Sarjan Rao Kapa ◽  
Suresh Jeepalyam
Keyword(s):  
Milk Production ◽  
Milk Yield ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Milk Protein ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Production Parameters ◽  
Murrah Buffaloes ◽  
Total Milk ◽  
Condition Score

The postpartum changes in Body Condition Score (BCS) studied from calving to four months of lactation in 40 Murrah buffaloes showed that BCS decreased from calving to two months of lactation and then gradually increased. Significant (P < 0.05) inverse relationship (r = -0.96) was observed between BCS and milk yield. The effect of BCS at calving (BCSc) on the milk production parameters were studied in 40 Murrah buffaloes divided into 4 groups of 10 buffaloes each based on BCSc (G1 – 2.5 to 2.99, G2- 3.0 to 3.49, G3- 3.5to 3.99 and G4- 4.0 to4.49). The total milk production (kg) upto 4 months of lactation, peak milk yield (kg), persistence, milk fat per cent, milk protein per cent and SNF per cent were 1030.93, 9.50, 1.65, 6.44, 3.39 and 8.99, respectively for G1 group, 1197.12, 11.60, 1.69, 7.54, 3.74 and 9.34 respectively for G2 group, 1658.67,16.50,1.77,8.62, 4.24 and 9.84, respectively for G3 and 1359.92, 13.75, 1.68, 9.37, 3.97 and 9.57, respectively for G4 group. Buffaloes of G3 group had significantly (p<0.01) more milk yield, peak milk yield, milk protein and SNF compared to the other groups where as buffaloes of G4 group had significantly (P<0.01) more milk fat.

Wheat as a survival ration for sheep. 1. The digestion of wheat and formaldehyde treated wheat

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (63) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
JP Langlands
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Organic Matter ◽  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Nitrogen Retention ◽  
N Retention ◽  
Abomasal Infusion ◽  
Organic Matter Digestibility

The digestibility of wheat and formaldehyde (HCHO) treated wheat and the metabolites formed during their digestion were examined in three experiments. The wheat ranged in nitrogen content from 2.4 to 2.6 g N/100 g organic matter. HCHO treatment had little effect on organic matter digestibility or on the proportions of individual volatile fatty acids (VFA) in the rumen although total VFA concentration and the proportion of organic matter digested in the stomach declined. The effect of HCHO treatment on apparent nitrogen digestibility varied between experiments although N retention and the quantity of nitrogen digested in the intestines were generally increased. The addition of urea to HCHO treated diets had no effect on digestibility, the quantity of N digested in the intestine, the concentration of total VFA or on the proportions of individual acids. Abomasal infusion of L-lysine hydrochloride and DL-methionine induced a small but not significant increase in nitrogen retention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document