scholarly journals Comparisons of Leaf Water Potential and Xylem Water Potential in tomato Plants

1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 485 ◽  
Author(s):  
HD Barrs ◽  
B Freeman ◽  
J Blackwell ◽  
RD Ceccato

The rapidity and convenience of the pressure chamber technique for estimating leaf water potentials, especially under field conditions, has been remarked (Boyer 1967; Kaufmann 1968a, 1968b) and demonstrated (Klepper and Ceccato 1969). However, Kaufmann (1968a) showed that it is necessary to exercise caution .in using measurements made with the pressure chamber as direct estimates of leaf water potential. Instead, he recommended that calibration curves should be drawn up for each species, relating measurements of xylem pressure potential obtained with this technique to corresponding known leaf water potentials. The present communication reports such a relation for tomato leaves, which have not previously been studied in this way. Plant age is shown to affect the relation.

1983 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Palta

SUMMARYIn the application of the Scholander pressure chamber technique to cassava water relations studies, the leaf water potential measured on central lobules was initially compared with that measured on entire leaves (including petiole). Measurements made using both a Campbell-Brewster hydraulic press and a pressure chamber of the leaf water potential in six different cassava clones were also compared. Although the central lobules showed a greater sensitivity to moisture loss after sampling than entire leaves, their leaf water potential was in close agreement with those measured on the entire leaves (r3 = 0·96). Therefore, for routine and field estimates in cassava, measurements made on the central lobules may be used to avoid the large reduction in total leaf area. The Campbell-Brewster hydraulic press satisfactorily estimated leaf water potential in M.Col. 1684 clone, which had the longest and narrowest lobules, but in other clones the leaf water potential was overestimated at high leaf potential (> -12·5) and underestimated at low water potentials (< -12·5). Over a wide range of leaf water potentials, a poor relationship between leaf water potentials estimated with hydraulic press and with the pressure chamber was observed for cassava because press estimates are influenced by lobule length and lobule width.


1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Turner ◽  
MJ Long

In rapidly transpiring leaves, the water potentials of uncovered leaves measured in a pressure chamber were 0.2-0.7 MPa lower than the water potentials of leaves that were covered with a plastic sheath from just prior to their excision to the completion of the measurement. The error in the water potential of uncovered leaves arose from rapid water loss in the first 30 s after excision. The degree to which the water potentials were lowered depended on the rate of transpiration, the leaf water potential at the time of excision, the species, and whether the plants were grown in the glasshouse or field. It is suggested that the variation between species and between glasshouse-grown and field-grown plants arises from differences in water retention characteristics of plant tissue as well as to differences in the rates of transpiration at excision. The size of the error induced by the rapid water loss on diurnal changes in leaf water potential is demonstrated and the effect of the error in the calculation of turgor potentials and in the resistances to water flow through the plant is discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 377 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Alvino ◽  
M Centritto ◽  
FD Lorenzi

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants were grown in 1 m2 lysimeters under two different water regimes in order to investigate differences in the spatial arrangements of the leaves and to relate this to daily assimilation rates of leaves of the canopy. The control regime (well-watered (W) treatment) was irrigated whenever the accumulated 'A' pan evaporation reached 4 cm, whereas the water-stressed (S) treatment was watered whenever the predawn leaf water potential fell below -1 MPa. During the growing cycle, equal numbers of sun and shade leaves were chosen from the apical, middle and basal parts of the canopy, corresponding to groups of leaves of increasing age. The CO2 exchange rate (CER) was measured at 0830, 1230 and 1530 hours on 8 days along the crop cycle, on leaves in their natural inclination and orientation. Leaf water potentials were measured on apical leaves before dawn and concurrently with gas exchange measurements. Control plants maintained predawn leaf water potential at -0.3 MPa, but S plants reached values lower than -1.2 MPa. Midday leaf water potentials were about twice as low in the S plants as in the controls. Water stress reduced LA1 during the period of crop growth, and dry matter production at harvest. Stressed apical leaves appeared to reduce stress by changing their inclination. They were paraheliotropic around midday and diaheliotropic at 0830 and 1530 hours. The CER values of the S treatment were significantly lower than those of the W treatment in apical and middle leaves, whereas the CER of basal leaves did not differ in either treatments. In the S treatment, reduction in the CER values of sunlit apical leaves was more evident in the afternoon than at midday or early in the morning, whereas basal leaves were less affected by water than basal stress leaves if sunlit, and negligibly in shaded conditions.


OENO One ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Xavier Choné ◽  
Olivier Trégoat ◽  
Cornelis Van Leeuwen ◽  
Denis Dubourdieu

<p style="text-align: justify;">Vine water status is an important factor in grape quality. High tannin and anthocyanin content in red grape berries are related to moderate vine water deficits. Hence, a simple and sensitive indicator is required to determine vine water status and especially water constraint. Pressure chamber allows a quick and easy to practice determination of water status in the vineyard. Three applications of pressure chamber are known: predawn leaf water potential (ΨB), leaf water potential (ΨF) and stem water potential (ΨT). Only ΨB and ΨF are widely used on vines. In this survey ΨB, ΨF, ΨT and transpiration flow were measured on mature leaves to determine non-irrigated vine water status in field grown vines during the growing season. In California as well as in France, stem Ψ was the most discriminating indicator for both moderate and severe water deficits. In every plot surveyed ΨT was much better correlated to leaf transpiration than ΨF. Moreover, ΨT revealed nascent water deficit earlier than ΨB did. Among the three application of pressure chamber, ΨT was the only one to indicate short term water deficit after a rainfall. Hence, ΨT appears to be a useful indicator for grapevine management in both non-irrigated and irrigated vineyards.</p>


1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 401 ◽  
Author(s):  
MM Ludlow ◽  
TT Ng

The responses of carbon dioxide exchange and leaf elongation of potted P. maximum var. trichoglume plants to water deficits were investigated in controlled environments and outdoors during drying cycles down to -92 bars leaf water potential, The sensitivities of net photosynthesis and leaf elongation to water deficits were similar. The leaf water potentials at which net photosynthesis and elongation ceased (c. -12 bars), and stomatal resistance increased substantially (- 6 bars), were relatively unaffected by nitrogen supply, environmental conditions during growth, and whether plants had previously experienced stress. However, these factors influenced the rate of net photosynthesis, at high leaf water potentials by affecting stomatal resistance and at moderate water potentials by affecting both stomatal and intracellular resistances. Stomata1 resistance was more sensitive than intracellular resistance to water deficits. Dark respiration rate decreased with leaf water potential, and was higher in plants receiving additional nitrogen. At moderate leaf water potentials (-7 to -9 bars), net photosynthesis of this C4 grass exhibited light saturation and rates similar to C3 plants. We suggest that the difference in behaviour of controlled-environment-grown and field-grown plants to water deficits observed with some species is unlikely to be due to differences in the aerial environment, but may result from differences in the rate at which stress develops. The ecological significance and evolution of the C4 syndrome are discussed briefly.


1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
CL Petrie ◽  
AE Hall

Pearl millet [Penniseturn americanum (L.) Leeke] consistently develops lower predawn leaf water potentials than cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] when plants are subjected to progressive soil drying, even when they are grown as intercrops in the same pot. Lack of equilibrium in water potential during the predawn, within the plants and between plants and soil, was studied as a possible explanation for this difference. Experiments were conducted in a glasshouse in pots containing an artificial rooting medium which had a high water-holding capacity and was easy to separate from roots. Leaf and root predawn xylem water potentials were measured with a pressure chamber. In cowpea, leaf water potential (ΨL) values during the dry treatment were similar to values of root water potential (ΨR), indicating an approximate equilibrium within the plants. In millet, measurements were made on plants grown in both large and small pots. With large pots, ΨL and ΨR values in millet were similar, but with small pots, predawn ΨL was lower than ΨR. When the surfaces of these small pots were covered with evaporation barriers, however, no significant differences developed between ΨL and ΨR at predawn during soil drying, indicating an approximate equilibrium within millet. During the early stages of the dry treatment, leaf surface conductances measured at predawn indicated that significant water flux occurred at night from the leaves of both cowpea and millet. Leaf surface conductances declined to negligible levels as the dry treatment progressed, however, and night-time fluxes of water from leaves cannot explain the significant difference in predawn ΨL that developed between cowpea and millet. In order to determine whether the lower predawn ΨL in millet was due to a resistance to water uptake at the root surface, an osmoticum (- 0.5 MPa mannitol solution) was applied to pots of cowpea and millet intercrops after substantial differences in predawn ΨL had developed, and ΨL was measured. Measurements taken 9 h later indicated that predawn ΨL had recovered in millet, and the values of ΨL in millet and cowpea after mannitol treatment were similar to the osmotic potential of the mannitol solution. These results suggest that the lower predawn ΨL in millet than in cowpea under drought is due to the development of a substantial soil resistance to water movement to the root surfaces of millet.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mehmandoost Kotlar ◽  
Mathieu Javaux

&lt;p&gt;Root water uptake is a major process controlling water balance and accounts for about 60% of global terrestrial evapotranspiration. The root system employs different strategies to better exploit available soil water, however, the regulation of water uptake under the spatiotemporal heterogeneous and uneven distribution of soil water is still a major question. To tackle this question, we need to understand how plants cope with this heterogeneity by adjustment of above ground responses to partial rhizosphere drying. Therefore, we use R-SWMS simulating soil water flow, flow towards the roots, and radial and the axial flow inside the root system to perform numerical experiments on a 9-cell gridded rhizotrone (50 cm&amp;#215;50 cm). The water potentials in each cell can be varied and fixed for the period of simulation and no water flow is allowed between cells while roots can pass over the boundaries. Then a static mature maize root architecture to different extents invaded in all cells is subjected to the various arrangements of cells' soil water potentials. R-SWMS allows determining possible hydraulic lift in drier areas. With these simulations, the variation of root water and leaf water potential will be determined and the role of root length density in each cell and corresponding average soil-root water potential will be statistically discussed.&lt;/p&gt;


1982 ◽  
Vol 27 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Leach ◽  
T. Woodhead ◽  
W. Day

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document