The effect of fallowing on the yield of wheat. I. The effect on soil water storage and nitrate supply

1978 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 653 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ French
Keyword(s):  
Water Storage ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Summer Rainfall ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Soil Preparation ◽  
Additional Water ◽  
Nitrate Supply ◽  
The Mean

The effect of fallowing before a wheat crop was studied in South Australia in an environment with suboptimal rainfall in the growing season. A 9–10 month pre-sowing fallow increased mean water storage (0–120 cm depth) at sowing by 28 mm, compared with a non-fallow soil preparation (2 month period of cultivation). Variation in additional storage ranged from nil to 125 mm. These amounts depended on soil type and season: in coarse-textured soils, fallowing conserved little additional water, but in fine-textured soils much additional water could be stored. Storage was not related to the summer rainfall (November-March) before sowing but was related to rainfall during July and August in the previous winter—just before or at the start of the fallow period. A combination of these two factors, fine-textured soil and good July–August rainfall, gave considerable storage. Fallowing also increased the nitrate nitrogen content in the surface 60 cm at sowing; the mean additional nitrogen amounted to 19 kg/ha in the coarse-textured soils and 30 kg/ha in the fine-textured soils. The largest increases due to fallowing were recorded in soils following medic leys and with ample rains on the fallow in spring. Comparison is made between these findings and those obtained with fallowing in other parts of Australia.

The effect of surface treatments on soil water storage and yield of wheat

1972 ◽  
Vol 12 (56) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
JE Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Heavy Rain ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Surface Sealing ◽  
Water Recharge ◽  
Chemical Fallow

Soil water changes under six pre-seeding surface treatments and the following wheat crop were recorded at three- to four-weekly intervals in two consecutive seasons (1966-67 and 1967-68) on a hard setting red-brown earth in South Australia. The treatments were 'fallow' (initial cultivation in spring, nine months before sowing), 'grassland' (initial cultivation in autumn, two months before sowing), 'chemical fallow' (sprayed with herbicides in spring), and three fallows separately modified with gypsum, straw and hexadecanol. In both experiments grassland lost water rapidly in spring and this lower water content was never completely restored. The fallow + straw gave the biggest recharge of soil water following rain and the highest water storage efficiency during the fallow period. In 1966-67, recharge of soil water followed rain in summer at a time of high evaporation rates. The effectiveness of the treatments in increasing soil water storage was related to their ability to reduce evaporation. In 1967-68, soil water recharge occurred in autumn when evaporation rates were low. The effectiveness of the treatments was then related to their ability to curb surface sealing by raindrop impact. Nitrate-N contents in the top 60 cm of soil at seeding were higher in 1967 than 1968, probably due to efficient mineralization in 1967 after summer rain, and leaching by heavy rain and denitrification before seeding in 1968. Crops on the fallow + straw treatment used most water and produced the highest wheat yields with the highest water-use efficiency in both years.

Soil water changes under fallow-crop treatments in relation to soil type, rainfall and yield of wheat

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (49) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
JE Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Fallow Period ◽  
One Year ◽  
Water Contents ◽  
Soil Water Contents

Soil water changes under fallow (initial cultivation in spring), grassland (initial cultivation in autumn) and the succeeding wheat crops were recorded at two to three weekly intervals in three consecutive seasons in three soil types representing the range of wheat-growing soils in South Australia. Differences in water content between the two treatments developed soon after the start of fallowing due to the greater loss of water from grassland in spring. Rainfall during the fallow period contributed little to soil water storage except in one year when heavy spring rains were recorded. In some instances the water content in the fallowed soils at seeding was less than at the start of fallowing, but the fallowed soils consistently retained more water than the grassland soils. Soil water contents decreased after August of the crop year (end of tillering) and by harvest the wheat crops had commonly dried the soil to a depth of 150 cm. Fallow crops used more water and produced significantly higher wheat yields with a greater efficiency of water use in all trials.

Effect of tillage and stubble management on soil water storage, crop growth and yield in a wheat-lupin rotation in southern NSW

1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 479 ◽  
Author(s):  
KY Chan ◽  
DP Heenan
Keyword(s):  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Wagga Wagga ◽  
Deep Drainage ◽  
Direct Drilling

The effects of tillage (conventional tillage v. direct drilling) and stubble management (stubble retained v. stubble burnt) on soil water storage, growth and yield of wheat were assessed over two seasons (1989-1990) in a wheat-lupin rotation on a red earth at Wagga Wagga, NSW. Soil water storage and efficiency of water use were different for the two seasons. Both direct drilling and stubble retention maintained the soil surface (0-0.1 m) at higher water content at sowing time. However, their effectiveness in increasing soil water storage at sowing was evident only in the 1990 season which, with average rainfall during the summer fallow, was drier than 1989. Average wheat grain yield was similar (4.02 v. 4.08 t/ha) for the two seasons even though the 1989 season had 245 mm more rain, the difference mainly occurring in March-April. Most of the excess water in seasons like 1989 was likely to have been lost by deep drainage, with implications for leaching of soluble nutrients, increasing subsoil acidity and rising watertables. Poor early growth of wheat when the stubble was retained and the crops direct drilled was season dependent. It was observed in the wheat crop only in the 1989 season which had a wet autumn. In that season, poor early growth which resulted in a significant yield reduction of 0.5 t/ha was associated with reduced water extraction before anthesis despite the availability of adequate soil water. No corresponding differences in growth and yield were observed for the lupin crop.

Water balance and the water-table in deep sandy soils of the upper south-east, South Australia

1960 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 970 ◽  
Author(s):  
JW Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Table ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Wetting Front ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Upper South ◽  
Static Level

A water-table occurs at an average depth of 11.3 m below the surface in deep sand country of the upper south-east of South Australia (County Cardwell). By observing the depth to which water penetrated into the soil profile during the wet season, and the static level of the water in bore-holes, it was proved that the watertable was not replenished by local rainfall. In three years of records, the wetting front penetrated 6.0, 2.1, and 3.6 m on the average, and the soil water thus stored was all used by the prevailing vegetation, either natural mallee heath or lucerne. The performance of the vegetation growing on the deep sand in ability to resist drought was characterized quantitatively by the supply rate of soil moisture as a function of the soil water storage. It was estimated that the yearly potential evaporation for 1957 was 113 cm. The mean annual rainfall is about 50 cm. The ground-water comes, it is suggested, from intake areas about 40 km east of the area under study, where surface floodwaters accumulate in wet seasons. The quantity of water flowing through the aquifer at present is calculated to be about 37 m3/(metre width of strip)/year.

scholarly journals Regression Models for Soil Water Storage Estimation Using the ESA CCI Satellite Soil Moisture Product: A Case Study in Northeast Portugal

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Tomás de Figueiredo ◽  
Ana Caroline Royer ◽  
Felícia Fonseca ◽  
Fabiana Costa de Araújo Schütz ◽  
Zulimar Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Soil Water Balance ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
The Relationship

The European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture (ESA CCI SM) product provides soil moisture estimates from radar satellite data with a daily temporal resolution. Despite validation exercises with ground data that have been performed since the product’s launch, SM has not yet been consistently related to soil water storage, which is a key step for its application for prediction purposes. This study aimed to analyse the relationship between soil water storage (S), which was obtained from soil water balance computations with ground meteorological data, and soil moisture, which was obtained from radar data, as affected by soil water storage capacity (Smax). As a case study, a 14-year monthly series of soil water storage, produced via soil water balance computations using ground meteorological data from northeast Portugal and Smax from 25 mm to 150 mm, were matched with the corresponding monthly averaged SM product. Linear (I) and logistic (II) regression models relating S with SM were compared. Model performance (r2 in the 0.8–0.9 range) varied non-monotonically with Smax, with it being the highest at an Smax of 50 mm. The logistic model (II) performed better than the linear model (I) in the lower range of Smax. Improvements in model performance obtained with segregation of the data series in two subsets, representing soil water recharge and depletion phases throughout the year, outlined the hysteresis in the relationship between S and SM.

scholarly journals Agrometeorological models for estimating sweet cassava yield

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Victor Brunini Moreto ◽  
Lucas Eduardo de Oliveira Aparecido ◽  
Glauco de Souza Rolim ◽  
José Reinaldo da Silva Cabral de Moraes
Keyword(s):  
Great Influence ◽  
Soil Water Storage ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
P Value ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Paulo State ◽  
State Water ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sweet Cassava ◽  
Main Factor

ABSTRACT Brazil is the fourth largest producer of cassava in the world, with climate conditions being the main factor regulating its production. This study aimed to develop agrometeorological models to estimate the sweet cassava yield for the São Paulo state, as well as to identify which climatic variables have more influence on yield. The models were built with multiple linear regression and classified by the following statistical indexes: lower mean absolute percentage error, higher adjusted determination coefficient and significance (p-value < 0.05). It was observed that the mean air temperature has a great influence on the sweet cassava yield during the whole cycle for all regions in the state. Water deficit and soil water storage were the most influential variables at the beginning and final stages. The models accuracy ranged in 3.11 %, 6.40 %, 6.77 % and 7.15 %, respectively for Registro, Mogi Mirim, Assis and Jaboticabal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document