Temperature effects on flower initiation in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis)

1976 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 399 ◽  
Author(s):  
GI Moss

The effects of temperature on flower induction in sweet orange were studied over a range of shoot and root temperatures representing the conditions found in the field in commercial growing regions. Rooted cuttings of the orange cultivar 'Late Valencia' were used in the Canberra phytotron, with an extended photoperiod of 16 hours and a photo-temperature of 8 hours' duration. Following low temperature inductive conditions (5 weeks at 15/10°C), profuse flowering occurred at 24/19°; flowering was only slightly less at this air temperature with a root temperature of 30°, and at an air temperature of 30/25°. At 36/31° few flowers were formed and these abscissed before opening. However, when the root temperature was maintained at 22° with this shoot temperature a few flowers were formed. In another experiment a root temperature of 30° and shoot temperature of 24/19° reduced the number of flowers that formed (86 cf. 137). Only a small part of the effect of high temperature in inhibiting flower initiation was due to root temperature. Two attempts were made to induce flowering under non-inductive temperatures (27/22°) with low root temperatures (15 and 11°). Flowering could not be induced under these conditions, and the lack of flowers apparently was not due to inhibition of growth by low root temperature. Although few flowers were formed at 27/22° without any previous inductive treatment (15 flowers per plant), profuse flowering was induced by 27/13° (141 flowers/plant), which indicated that a low night temperature will induce flowering. A high root temperature (29°) during inductive conditions (15/10°) had little effect on the number of flowers formed. It appeared that the site of flower stimulation by temperature was in the shoot only, and that subsequent high root temperature effected floral development. It was concluded that flowering could be induced in the field during the summer by low night temperature, and root temperatures would probably have little influence on floral development.

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. T. Collinson ◽  
R. H. Ellis ◽  
R. J. Summerfield ◽  
E. H. Roberts

SUMMARYPlants of rice (Oryza sativa)cultivar IR36 were grown under flooded and free-draining conditions at a constant air temperature of 28°C with an 11.5 h d−1 photoperiod in both a growth cabinet and a glasshouse. The nutrient solution within flooded pots was maintained at 20°, 24° or 28°C, or was not controlled. Rate of floral development was enhanced by warmer nutrient solution temperatures at the same air temperature; times to panicle emergence were reduced by an average of 17 d with increase in the nutrient solution temperature from 20° to 28°C. In comparable treatments, plants grown in the growth cabinet reached panicle emergence later than those grown in the glasshouse, possibly because mean air temperature was on average 0.8°C cooler in the growth cabinet. An independent model, derived from a previous investigation, provided a good prediction of the times from sowing to panicle emergence for plants grown in both the glasshouse and the growth cabinet when based on the mean of the temperatures of the nutrient solution and the air, showing that it is important to determine water/root temperature as well as air temperature when investigating the effect of environment on development of the rice plant.


1963 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Scurfield

Seedlings of Phalaris canariensis and P. tuberosa were grown in pots outdoors and under glass-house conditions in experiments at Canberra. Sigmoid curves expressed the increase in total dry weight, dry weight of plant parts, and tiller number for both species grown outdoors for 5 months. Phase 1 — the vegetative phase of growth — ended on about September 18 for P. canariensis and September 12 for P. tuberosa. Subsequent experiments were concerned with the effects of temperature on this growth phase. In experiments lasting for up to 44 days, both species were grown under natural (winter) conditions of light intensity and day length (less than 12 hr) and 16 combinations of day and night temperature. The optimum regime for dry weight production — 24/18–19°C — did not correspond with that optimal for tiller initiation. Highest tiller numbers were obtained when night temperature exceeded day temperature (19/22° or 19/24°), or approached the optimum day temperature (24/22° or 24/24°), or there was a relatively large fluctuation between day and night temperature (28/18°, for example). P. canariensis outyielded P. tuberosa under optimum temperature conditions, but P. tuberosa appeared to be less sensitive to night temperatures of 22–24°. No consistent trends in the effects of day or night temperature on the nitrogen content of tops, leaf length, leaf breadth, or the ratio leaf length/breadth were obtained. Leaf size and shape were, however, influenced by temperature. A comparison of the growth of the Australian commercial P. tuberosa was made with that of strains from Israel and Algeria under six temperature regimes. Under cold and cool conditions, the Algerian strain resembled the Australian strain, both being outyielded by the Israeli strain. Under a regime of 28/23°, however, the Algerian and Israeli strains were adversely affected, the latter more than the former. In nutrient culture solution, a root temperature of 20° approached the optimum for dry weight production and tiller initiation by P. canariensis more nearly than one of either 12° or 27°, ambient temperature being 24/20°. Leaf size was also influenced by root temperature.


2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1507-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neng-Guo TAO ◽  
Juan XU ◽  
Yun-Jiang CHENG ◽  
Liu HONG ◽  
Wen-Wu GUO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document