Studies of fat distribution in the bovine carcass. I. The partition of fatty tissues between depots

1972 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 381 ◽  
Author(s):  
HR Johnson ◽  
RM Butterfield ◽  
WJ Pryor
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Fat Distribution ◽  
Intramuscular Fat ◽  
Carcass Weight ◽  
Fatty Tissue ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Definition Of

(1) Total side fat (total dissected fat plus intramuscular fat) was examined in 23 bovine carcasses in four weight ranges. (2) The partition of fatty tissue between five depots revealed relative rises in intermuscular and subcutaneous depots and relative declines in intramuscular, kidney, and channel fats with increasing carcass weight. (3) Intermuscular and subcutaneous fats reached high levels relative to total side fat at different stages. Intermuscular fat rose quickly to c. 45.0% of total side fat at about 2.0 kg total side fat (c. 56 days) whilst subcutaneous fat reached 29.0% at c. 13.0 kg total side fat (c. 270 days). (4) Intramuscular fat did not show an increase relative to total side fat as carcass weight increased. Its contribution to total fat was greatest in the lightest sides and reached a minimal value at c. 13.0 kg total side fat, which it maintained thereafter. (5) All regressions of the weight of five fat depots on total side fat were highly significant (P < 0.01). (6) There appears to be a need for precise definition of fat distribution patterns in breeds and strains of cattle in order that carcasses of optimum composition might be produced.

Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity

1980 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Wood ◽  
H. J. H. MacFie ◽  
R. W. Pomeroy ◽  
D. J. Twinn
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Carcass Weight ◽  
Relative Growth ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Omental Fat ◽  
Mature Size

ABSTRACTIn order to investigate the effects of type of breed on carcass composition, an examination was made of 361 lambs from four breeds: Clun Forest and Colbred (termed ewe breeds); and Suffolk and Hampshire (termed ram breeds). The animals were in four carcass weight groups averaging 15, 17, 19 and 21 kg.Percentage subcutaneous fat was influenced more by carcass weight than by breed, whereas both carcass weight and breed had similar effects on percentage lean. At the mean carcass weight of 18 kg, Colbreds, the leanest breed, had a similar value for percentage lean (about 57 % of carcass tissue weight) to the carcasses over all breeds weighing 15 kg; and Cluns, the fattest breed, had a similar value (about 54%) to those weighing 21 kg. Since the ram breeds were intermediate in composition between the two ewe breeds there was no effect of type of breed on carcass composition. The breed differences were related to eventual mature size and to the stage of maturity at each carcass weight, as judged by body length and bone weight measurements. However, Colbreds were bigger and leaner than published estimates of their mature weight suggested. Humerus weight was a good predictor of lean or total fat weight, explaining 83 % ofvariation when used as a predictor along with carcass weight.Type of breed had a marked effect on internal fat deposition, the ewe breeds having heavier weights of both kidney knob and channel fat (KKCF) and caul fat (omental fat) than the ram breeds; and on the length oflimb bones, the ewe breeds having longer but thinner bones than the ram breeds. The order of the relative growth of the tissues and fat depots was: subcutaneous fat > caul fat > KKCF > intermuscular fat > lean > bone. Therefore, the internal fat depots were later maturing than intermuscular fat.The percentage of prime cuts in the carcass was not affected by carcass weight. Colbreds had significantly lower values than the other breeds. Suffolks had the lowest lean to bone ratio.

The significance of breed in the prediction of lamb carcass composition from fat thickness measurements

1980 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Wood ◽  
H. J. H. MacFie
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Fat Distribution ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Carcass Weight ◽  
Multiple Regression Equation ◽  
Eye Muscle ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Thickness Measurements

ABSTRACTFat thickness and measurements of the m. longissimus (‘eye’ muscle) were taken at the last rib in 350 lambs' carcasses which were fully dissected. The lambs were from two ewe breeds, Clun and Colbred, and two ram breeds, Suffolk and Hampshire, and the carcass weight range was 15 to 21kg. Castrated males and females, and singles and twins, were evenly represented.Rib fat thickness (J) was a slightly more precise predictor of the weights of lean, subcutaneous fat and subcutaneous plus intermuscular fat, when used in a multiple regression equation along with carcass weight, than fat thickness directly above the greatest depth of the ‘eye’ muscle (C). Both of these were more precise predictors than ‘eye’ muscle width and depth. Accounting for breed, either by allowing for different intercepts or completely different regression lines, did increase the proportion of variation in tissue weights explained by carcass weight and J or C, but to a small and, it was considered, commercially unimportant extent. This was despite differences in conformation between the breeds, reflected in this work by smaller ‘eye’ muscles in the ewe than the ram breeds and also in maturity, which might have been expected to influence tissue, including fat, distribution.The results indicate that breed differences in partition and distribution within and between the carcass fat depots in sheep are smaller than those between the carcass and intra-abdominal fat depots.

Evolution of various adipose deposits in growing rabbits and sheep

1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vezinhet ◽  
M. Prud'hon
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Growth Period ◽  
Fatty Tissue ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Relative Growth ◽  
Fat Deposits ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Perirenal Fat

SUMMARYThe importance of the different adipose deposits with respect to the total dissectible fatty tissue in growing rabbits and lambs was studied. Development of the subcutaneous fat in the lamb is late and occurs after birth. In contrast, the internal types of fat, such as the perirenal and pelvic fat, represent at birth an important percentage of the total fat. They tend to lose part of their relative importance between 0 and 250 days after birth. In the rabbit the situation concerning the development of subcutaneous and perirenal fat is inverted. For both species the intermuscular fat remains almost constant in relative importance during the whole growth period.After the period required for the establishment of the different fat deposits, we could observe in lambs, and to a smaller degree in rabbits, a relative growth which tends to become isometric with regard to the total fat deposits.

Growth changes in the distribution of dissectable and intramuscular fat in pigs

1977 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Davies ◽  
W. J. Pryor
Keyword(s):  
Dry Matter ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Intramuscular Fat ◽  
Fat Content ◽  
Large White ◽  
Growth Series ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Muscle Groups

SummaryThe subcutaneous, intermuscular and cavity fat depots of the half carcasses of 15 Large White × Landrace castrated male pigs, forming a growth series from 8 to 62 kg live weight, were dissected. Seventy individual muscles of these pigs were analysed for intramuscular fat content. The growth rates of each of the four fat depots, relative to total fat, were similar. Subcutaneous fat was the predominant fat depot over the growth range studied. Both intramuscular fat and non-fat dry matter grew faster than the entire muscles containing them. Growth gradients for the intramuscular fat of muscle groups, relative to either total intramuscular fat or to total fat, were similar to those for the entire muscles. The growth gradients for muscle groups were affected by neither the growth of the contained intramuscular fat nor the contained non-fat dry matter. Intramuscular fat density, but not non-fat dry-matter density, varied throughout the carcass. The fat content of muscles was highest in those that could be useful as subcutaneous insulators.

scholarly journals Why are we shaped differently, and why does it matter?

2008 ◽  
Vol 295 (3) ◽  
pp. E531-E535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Santosa ◽  
Michael D. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Fat Distribution ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Metabolic Disturbances ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Subcutaneous Adipose ◽  
And Storage

Body fat distribution is an important predictor of metabolic abnormalities in obese humans. Dysregulation of free fatty acid (FFA) release, especially from upper body subcutaneous adipose tissue, appears to contribute substantially to these metabolic disturbances. Why different individuals preferentially store fat in upper vs. lower body subcutaneous fat or subcutaneous vs. visceral fat is not completely understood. Current evidence suggests that defects in regional lipolysis are not the cause of net fat retention in larger fat depots. Regional variations in the storage of fatty acids, both meal derived and direct reuptake, and storage of circulating FFAs that may help to explain why some depots expand at the expense of others have been reported. We review the quantitative data on regional lipolysis, meal, and FFA storage in adults to provide an overview of fat balance differences in adults with different fat distribution patterns.

A note on the use of a lumbar joint as a predictor of body fat depots in Aragonesa ewes with different body condition scores

1989 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Delfa ◽  
A. Teixeira ◽  
F. Colomer-Rocher
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
The Body ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Body Condition Scores

The lumbar joint, which is handled to assess body condition scores, was taken from 52 adult Rasa Aragonesa ewes with body condition scores between 1·5 and 4·5 and dissected into muscle, bone, subcutaneous and intermuscular fat. The subcutaneous fat in the lumbar joint was highly correlated with total fat in the body (r=0·97), confirming the value of this region for assessing body condition in Rasa Aragonesa ewes.

FAT GROWTH AND PARTITIONING AMONG THE DEPOTS IN DOUBLE MUSCLED AND NORMAL CATTLE

1985 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
KARIMA A. SHAHIN ◽  
R. T. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rates ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Fatty Tissue ◽  
Lower Growth ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Growth Partitioning ◽  
Maturity Type ◽  
The Common ◽  
Fat Depot

Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic (SY) and 18 Hereford (HE) bulls were serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg liveweight to determine the influence of maturity type and "double muscling" on fat growth, partitioning and distribution. The fatty tissue was dissected into subcutaneous fat (SCF), intermuscular fat (IMF) and carcass cavity fat (CCF); the sum of these depots was used as total side fat (TSF). Relative to TSF, DM did not differ significantly from the other maturity types in growth rates of SCF, IMF and CCF, but relative to fat percent in the side, DM tended to have much lower growth rates for SCF and CCF. The common growth coefficients indicated that as TSF increased the proportion of SCF increased (b > 1; P < 0.05), the proportion of IMF decreased (b < 1; P < 0.05), and the proportion of CCF remained relatively constant (b = 1; P > 0.05). At equal TSF, as expected, HE tended to partition more of their fat to the subcutaneous depot, whereas DM and SY tended to partition more of their fat to the intermuscular and carcass cavity fat depots. Relative to HE, DM followed late-developing fat partitioning patterns. The hypodevelopment of fat depots in the carcasses of the muscular hypertrophied animals followed an inner-outer gradient which was most pronounced in the subcutaneous fat depot. Key words: Cattle, fat growth, double muscling, breed type

The composition, fat distribution and yield of carcass beef from steers and heifers when entire, spayed, pregnant or fitted with an intravaginal device

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (123) ◽  
pp. 354 ◽  
Author(s):  
GR Saul
Keyword(s):  
Age Differences ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Fat Distribution ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Carcass Weight ◽  
Kidney Fat ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Intravaginal Device ◽  
Beef Muscle ◽  
Research Institute

An experiment at the Pastoral Research Institute, Hamilton, compared the carcass composition and yield of one group of 14 Hereford steers, and four groups of 14 heifers, either spayed, fitted with an intravaginal device, pregnant or entire. The animals were slaughtered at 18 or 22 months when average fat depths and carcass weights were 5.8 mm and 188.0 kg, or 7.5 mm and 219 kg, respectively. When compared at a constant carcass weight, the steers generally had heavier boneless primary cuts, with less fat than the heifers (P<0. 05). Steers also had less channel and kidney fat, subcutaneous fat, intra-muscular and inter-muscular fat and consequently less total fat than heifers (P<.05) . Differences between heifer groups were generally small and non-significant. When compared at the same age, differences between heifers and steers in carcass fatness were generally not significant (P>0. 05) but trends similar to those described above were apparent. Estimated yield of carcass beef (muscle plus saleable fat) was affected by sex, fat depth and level of fat specified in the carcass beef. When lean carcass beef (1 5% fat) was specified, steers yielded about 3.8% more than heifers at the same weight and fat depth, but when fatter carcass beef (20% fat) was specified, this difference was reduced to about 3.2%. Removal of channel and kidney fat from the carcass brought the yield of steer and heifer carcasses to within about 3.0% of each other.

The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development: 2. Tissue weight distribution and fat partition between depots

1979 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Kempster ◽  
D. G. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Weight Distribution ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Tissue Weight ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
Feeding Regimen ◽  
Regression Slopes ◽  
Total Fat

SUMMARYDissection data for 1006 carcasses taken from the first 2 years of the Meat and Livestock Commission's (MLC) Commercial Pig Evaluation (CPE) were used to examine the growth of tissue weights in joints relative to the corresponding total tissue weight in carcass, and the growth of fat depots relative to total fat over the carcass weight range, 46–92 kg. Growth relationships were examined using a linear allometric model. Differences in tissue weight distribution between genotypes (pigs from different companies in CPE), sexes (barrows and gilts) and feeding regimens (restricted and ad libitum feeding) were examined at constant lean, bone or fat weight as appropriate, common allometric regression slopes being assumed.Lean and bone showed the same pattern of development. Relative growth was lowest in the proximal limb joints (ham and hand) increasing inwards to the joints of the back. With minor differences, the same pattern was found for subcutaneous fat and intermuscular fat. Fat depots differed considerably in their growth relative to total fat: intermuscular fat grew more slowly (allometric growth coefficient, b = 0·87), subcutaneous fat at the same rate and perinephric and retroperitoneal fat (flare fat) more rapidly (b = 1·24).Significant differences were recorded between genotypes in lean distribution and in the distribution of fat depots. However, the differences were small and of little commercial importance. There were also differences in fat partition between genotypes, flare fat being the most variable depot.Sex and feeding regimen also influenced tissue distribution and fat partition.The results are discussed in relation to the robustness of regression equations for predicting overall carcass composition from subcutaneous fat measurements and sample joint dissections.

Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 3. Fat partitioning

1985 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Butterfield ◽  
J. M. Thompson ◽  
K. J. Reddacliff
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Mesenteric Fat ◽  
Total Body Fat ◽  
Intermuscular Fat ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Total Fat ◽  
Total Body

ABSTRACTThe effect of castration on fat partitioning in mature animals and on the maturing patterns for fat depots relative to total body fat was examined using slaughter and dissection data from 20 Dorset Horn rams and 20 Dorset Horn wethers. Animals were slaughtered at 6 kg intervals from 18 kg live weight to maturity. Five rams and eight wethers were classified as mature.In the mature animals the partitioning of fat differed for the rams and wethers in that the rams had a lower proportion of subcutaneous fat, and higher proportion of intermuscular and mesenteric fat than the wethers. However, the proportions of total carcass dissectible fat (i.e. subcutaneous plus intermuscular fat) and of the total non-carcass depots (i.e. kidney plus channel fat, omental, scrotal and thoracic fat) did not significantly differ between rams and wethers.The maturity coefficients of individual fat depots of rams and wethers were not significantly different and six of the nine depots were average maturing relative to total body fat. The intermuscular and thoracic fat depots were early maturing (maturity coeffient q= 1·19, 2·26 respectively), and the omental depot was late maturing (q= 0·52).Comparison of the partitioning of fat in rams and wethers reflected the differences in the mature animals when made at either the mean weight or at the mean stage of maturity, as the maturing patterns of most depots were not greatly different from that of total fat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document