Are temperature effects on weight and quality of barley grains modified by resource availability?

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria S. Passarella ◽  
Roxana Savin ◽  
Gustavo A. Slafer
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
Resource Availability ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Malt Extract ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilisation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Barley Grains ◽  
Source Sink

Under field conditions the occurrence of brief periods of moderately high (30–32°C) and very high temperatures (>35°C) is quite common during grain filling in small-grain cereals. These events occur under a wide range of different management and environmental conditions, such as different nitrogen supplies and source–sink ratios after flowering. The objective of the present work was to study whether the effect of a brief heat stress is modified by resource availability for the growing grains. We subjected spikes of barley 10 days after flowering to a heat treatment in factorial combination with different nitrogen availabilities and source–sink ratios during post-flowering to determine effects on grain weight and major malting quality attributes. Grain weight and screening percentage (proportion of grains <2.5 mm) were reduced by the mild heat stress. However, the magnitude of the effect was dependent on the nitrogen fertilisation and the source–sink treatments in which the heat stress was imposed. Grain protein and β-glucan percentages were increased by both nitrogen fertilisation and heat stress. Again, the magnitude of the increase was dependent upon the availability of resources. There was a trend to reduce malt extract in all treatments with respect to the control, but the reduction was only statistically significant with heat stress.

Grain weight and malting quality in barley as affected by brief periods of increased spike temperature under field conditions

2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria S. Passarella ◽  
Roxana Savin ◽  
Gustavo A. Slafer
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Malt Extract ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Grain Nitrogen ◽  
Nitrogen Percentage

High temperature is usually one of the most important stresses during grain filling affecting both yield and quality in barley crops. In the present study, an attempt was made to assess in the field the effects of short periods of high temperature, using transparent boxes covering only the spikes, with thermostatically controlled electric resistance for increasing the temperature. Treatments consisted of 2 malting cultivars and 5 heat treatments of high temperatures (8�C above the environmental temperature for 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days) over different periods during grain filling. Final grain weight was reduced by 2–14%, depending on the timing of heat stress and the genotype. There was a significant increase in grain nitrogen percentage in both cultivars, and grain β-glucans decreased with high temperatures in Logan and were unchanged in Beka. The resulting malt extract was reduced with exposure to high temperatures, depending on the cultivar, implying that even mild heat stress may change malting performance.

Heat stress effects on source–sink relationships and metabolome dynamics in wheat

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Abdelrahman ◽  
David J Burritt ◽  
Aarti Gupta ◽  
Hisashi Tsujimoto ◽  
Lam-Son Phan Tran
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Wheat Breeding ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Stress Effects ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
High Yields ◽  
Source Sink

Abstract Crops such as wheat (Triticum spp.) are predicted to face more frequent exposures to heat stress as a result of climate change. Increasing the yield and sustainability of yield under such stressful conditions has long been a major target of wheat breeding, and this goal is becoming increasingly urgent as the global population increases. Exposure of wheat plants in their reproductive or grain-filling stage to high temperature affects the duration and rate of grain filling, and hence has a negative impact on wheat productivity. Therefore, understanding the plasticity of the response to heat stress that exists between wheat genotypes, especially in source–sink relationships at the reproductive and grain-filling stages, is critical for the selection of germplasm that can maintain high yields under heat stress. A broad understanding of metabolic dynamics and the relationships between metabolism and heat tolerance is required in order to achieve this goal. Here, we review the current literature concerning the effects of heat stress on sink–source relationships in a wide range of wheat genotypes, and highlight the current metabolomic approaches that are used to investigate high temperature responses in wheat.

Effects of timing of heat stress and drought on growth and quality of barley grains

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxana Savin ◽  
Marc E. Nicolas
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Grain Quality ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Grain Nitrogen ◽  
Barley Grains ◽  
Nitrogen Percentage ◽  
Days After Anthesis

In order to determine the importance of timing of short periods of high temperature and drought on grain weight and grain quality, a glasshouse experiment was carried out in which Schooner barley was exposed to short periods of heat stress (40˚C for 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days) or drought at early grain filling (10–15 days after anthesis, DAA), mid grain filling (20–25 DAA), or late grain filling (30–35 DAA). Individual grain weight was most sensitive to heat stress and drought treatments imposed early in grain filling and was less sensitive to later treatments. The reduction in grain weight was greater under heat stress (average 13%) than under drought in this study (average 6%). Starch was reduced in amount and quality, especially with early stresses during grain filling, but grain nitrogen percentage was similar between treatments.

Grain and malting quality in two-row spring barley are influenced by grain filling moisture

2004 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. H. Paynter ◽  
K. J. Young
Keyword(s):  
Grain Quality ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Irrigation Treatment ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Growing Degree Days ◽  
Malt Extract ◽  
Degree Days ◽  
Irrigation Treatments

Spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Lindwall) was sown in 2 experiments in 1995 and 1 experiment in 1996 in the eastern wheatbelt of Western Australia to examine the effect of varying moisture supply during grain filling on grain and malting quality. Drip irrigation (T-tape) to the soil surface was used to simulate rainfall. Plots were sown without rainout shelters and no rain fell during the linear phase of grain filling in all 3 experiments. The control plot received no irrigation. Irrigation treatments in 1995 were a once only 25 mm application at either 80, 185, 270, or 460 growing degree-days after awn emergence. Irrigation treatments in 1996 were a once-only 25-mm application at either 185 or 460 growing degree-days after awn emergence or a weekly irrigation treatment of 25 mm (total application of 75 mm over 3 irrigations). No attempt was made to compensate for evaporation or to match plant demand. This study demonstrated improvements in grain plumpness, grain quality, and malting quality with a single 25-mm irrigation during the early linear stages of grain filling (20–40% complete as percentage of final grain weight) in water stressed plants. The irrigation resulted in increased average grain weight, grain yield, amount of maltable grain, and malt extract and decreased the amount of grain passing through a 2.5-mm slotted sieve, grain protein concentration and diastase. This single irrigation, however, was not sufficient to change screening levels to meet receival standards for malting barley and demonstrated the effect of moisture stress on narrow-grained cultivars such as Lindwall. A single irrigation earlier than 20% grain fill completed had a smaller effect on grain plumpness, grain quality, and malting quality. A single irrigation during the latter part of grain filling (>90% grain fill completed) had little or no effect on grain plumpness, grain quality, or malting quality. Weekly irrigation in 1996 had a bigger effect than a single irrigation and demonstrated the environmental limitation to quality in that season. Weekly irrigation increased average grain weight by 10 mg relative to control plots, reduced screenings from 88% to 18% through a 2.5-mm sieve, increased grain yields by 88%, increased malt extract by 3%, and decreased diastase by 116 pabah. There was no effect on grain modification or wort viscosity. Viscometric analysis of the barley flour showed a higher time to peak viscosity of the control, which suggests that gelatinisation temperatures were being decreased by irrigation in 1996.

Grain growth and malting quality of barley. 1. Effects of heat stress and moderately high temperature

1997 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxana Savin ◽  
Peter J. Stone ◽  
Marc E. Nicolas ◽  
Ian F. Wardlaw
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Grain Growth ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Very High ◽  
Moderately High Temperature

In this study, controlled-environment conditions were used to compare the effects of moderately high and very high temperatures during grain filling on grain growth and malting quality of barley. Heat stress applied from 15 to 20 days after anthesis (DAA) reduced grain weight by about 35%, whereas longer periods (15–20 days) of moderately high temperature applied from 20 DAA to maturity reduced grain weight by about 6%. Both heat stress and moderately high temperature resulted in reduced grain weight through a reduction in the duration of grain filling. Grain composition was altered by both moderately high and very high temperatures, although the changes were larger under very high temperatures. In general, there was a decrease in starch content, resulting from the reduction in both volume and number of A- and B-type starch granules. Nitrogen concentration was significantly increased only in the 30/25°C treatments, and changes in diastatic power were only minor. There was a reduction in β-glucan content, together with an increase in β-glucan degradation. However, malt extract was not significantly affected by these stresses.

scholarly journals Problems and possibilities of studying malting quality in barley using molecular genetic approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-177
Author(s):  
N. V. Trubacheeva ◽  
L. A. Pershina
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Genome Wide Association Study ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Amino Nitrogen ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Malt Extract ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Barley Grains ◽  
Growing Conditions

About one-third of the world’s barley crop is used for malt production to meet the needs of the brewing industry. In this regard, the study of the genetic basis of malting quality traits and the breeding of malting barley varieties that are adaptive to their growing conditions are relevant throughout the world, particularly in the Russian Federation, where the cultivation and use of foreign malting varieties of barley prevails. The main parameters of malting quality (artificially germinated and dried barley grains) are malt extract, diastatic power, Kolbach index, viscosity, grain protein, wort β-glucan, free amino nitrogen, and soluble protein content. Most of these components are under the control of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and are affected by environmental conditions, which complicates their study and precise localization. In addition, the phenotypic assessment of malting quality traits requires elaborate, expensive phenotypic analyses. Currently, there are more than 200 QTLs associated with malting parameters, which were identified using biparental mapping populations. Molecular markers are widely used both for mapping QTL loci responsible for malting quality traits and for performing marker-assisted selection (MAS), which, in combination with conventional breeding, makes it possible to create effective strategies aimed at accelerating the process of obtaining new promising genotypes. Nevertheless, the MAS of malting quality traits faces a series of difficulties, such as the low accuracy of localization of QTLs, their ineffectiveness when transferred to another genetic background, and linkage with undesirable traits, which makes it necessary to validate QTLs and the molecular markers linked to them. This review presents the results of studies that used MAS to improve the malting quality of barley, and it also considers studies that searched for associations between genotype and phenotype, carried out using GWAS (genome-wide association study) approaches based on the latest achievements of high-throughput genotyping (diversity array technology (DArT) and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs)).

Postanthesis green area duration in a semidwarf and a standard-height wheat cultivar as affected by sink strength

1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
GA Slafer ◽  
R Savin
Keyword(s):  
Grain Growth ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrates ◽  
Sink Strength ◽  
Green Area ◽  
Ca 50 ◽  
Source Sink ◽  
The University

Postanthesis green area duration (GAD) has been associated frequently with yield. The senescence pattern of green organs is a major component of GAD. It has been proposed that delayed or accelerated senescence is strongly controlled by environmental conditions and the level of source or sink limitation on grain growth. In particular, it has been generally reported that the removal of reproductive structures delays the senescence process. However, results reporting this effect in wheat are not conclusive. A field experiment was conducted at the experimental station of The University of Melbourne comprising a factorial combination of a semidwarf and a standard-height wheat, and two levels of sink strength. At anthesis, 20 main shoots were tagged and detillered. Ten days after anthesis all the spikelets from one side of 10 tagged ears were removed by hand. The experiment was performed under natural, and 3 h-extended photoperiods from seedling emergence to heading. The photoperiod treatments induced differing grain filling environments and differing plant characteristics at onset of grain filling. Green area senescence was similar for both sink size treatments at any combination of cultivar and grain filling condition, indicating that the dynamics of plant senescence was insensitive to a severe reduction in number of grains per spike. Therefore, GAD was not significantly affected by the reduction in sink strength. The number of grains per spike were reduced to ca. 50% due to trimming. Therefore, source-sink ratio was doubled, but no significant changes in individual grain weight were found. There was no relationship between GAD and individual grain weight, confirming that grain growth in field-grown wheat is not limited by the strength of the source. Alternatively, our results confirmed that field-grown wheat is sink-limited during grain filling and that the likely accumulation of soluble carbohydrates in leaves does not affect the onset or rate of senescence.

Environmental and genetic variation for grain yield and barley malting quality attributes

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Q. Lu ◽  
L. O'Brien ◽  
I. M. Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Quality Attributes ◽  
Malting Quality ◽  
Malt Extract ◽  
Progeny Testing ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Selection For

Genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interaction effects for malting quality attributes and grain yield were investigated using breeding lines from the F2, F3, and F4 generations and the parental varieties of 4 barley crosses. There were significant differences between the parental varieties for all attributes studied. Both malting quality and grain yield exhibited a wide range among progenies in all generations. While performance of the parental varieties and progeny for malting quality and grain yield were greatly influenced by environment, performance in one environment was predictive of that in other environments. Only for grain protein content was there evidence of crossover G × E interaction. Heritability was generally higher for F3 to F4 than for F2 to F3 for all malting quality attributes. F3 on F2 regression per cent heritability estimates for protein content, potential malt extract and grain weight were all highly significant with values generally medium in magnitude. Genetic gain was obtained from selection in both the F2 and F3 generations. Heritability and genetic gain varied from cross to cross for diastatic power. Progress from selection for the other quality attributes attests to the potential value of NIT (near infrared transmittance) spectroscopy for predicting potential malting quality. Heritability for F2 to F3 for grain yield was not significant in any cross, indicating selection for yield on the basis of individual F2 plant yield was ineffective. Heritability for grain yield from F3 to F4 was highly significant and medium in magnitude for 3 of the 4 crosses. The results of this study indicate that good genetic gain could be expected from early generation selection for potential malting quality using NIT spectroscopy and for grain yield using F3 progeny testing.

scholarly journals Estimating Organ Contribution to Grain Filling and Potential for Source Upregulation in Wheat Cultivars with a Contrasting Source–Sink Balance

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1527
Author(s):  
Carolina Rivera-Amado ◽  
Gemma Molero ◽  
Eliseo Trujillo-Negrellos ◽  
Matthew Reynolds ◽  
John Foulkes
Keyword(s):  
Grain Growth ◽  
Photosynthetic Rate ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Leaf Sheath ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Sink Limitation ◽  
Source Sink ◽  
Source And Sink

Grain filling may be limited by the joint source and sink capacity in modern wheat cultivars, indicating a need to research the co-limitation of yield by both photosynthesis and the number and potential size of grains. The extent to which the post-anthesis source may be limiting final grain size can be estimated by partial degraining of spikes, while defoliation and shading treatments can be useful to estimate if any excess photosynthetic capacity exists. In the current study, degraining was applied to a set of 26 elite spring wheat cultivars from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)’s core germplasm (CIMCOG) panel, while lamina defoliation and shading through stem-and-leaf-sheath covering treatments were applied to a subset of the same cultivars. Responses to source treatments in grain weight, pre-anthesis reserve contribution to grain weight, dry-matter translocation efficiency, and flag-leaf and spike photosynthetic rate were measured and compared to an unmanipulated control treatment. Grain weight responses to degraining among cultivars ranged from no response to increases of 28%, suggesting a range of responses from sink limitation, to probable source and sink co-limitation of grain growth. Grain weight’s response to degraining increased linearly with the years of cultivar release from 1966 to 2009, indicating that the current highest yield potential CIMMYT spring wheats have a co-limitation of grain growth by source and sink. This may have been due to an increase in grain sink strength with years of cultivar release with no commensurate increase in post-anthesis source capacity. The relatively low decreases in grain weight with defoliation compared to decreases in light interception by defoliation indicated that sink limitation was still likely predominating in the cultivars with co-limitation. The stem-and-leaf-sheath covering treatment decreased grain weight by nearly 10%, indicating that stem-and-leafsheath photosynthesis plays a key role in grain growth during grain filling. In addition, pre-anthesis reserve contribution to grain weight was increased by ca. 50% in response to lamina defoliation. Our results showed that increasing the post-anthesis source capacity, through increases in stem-and-leaf-sheath photosynthetic rate during grain filling and pre-anthesis reserve contribution to grain weight, is an important objective in enhancing yield potential in wheat through maintaining a source–sink balance.

Evaluation of cellular thermotolerance and associated heat tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown condition

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chubasenla Aochen ◽  
Pravin Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Grain Weight ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Grain Filling Rate ◽  
Grain Filling Duration ◽  
Membrane Thermostability ◽  
Heat Susceptibility Index ◽  
1000 Grain Weight

Fifty wheat genotypes were evaluated at the seedling stage of growth, for genetic variation in cellular thermotolerance by cell membrane thermostability (CMS) and Triphenyl tetrazolium choride (TTC) assays. A subset of eight genotypes was also evaluated at the anthesis stage using the same assays. Large and significant differences existed among wheat genotypes for TTC and CMS at the seedling and anthesis stages. Average thermotolerance declined from seedling to anthesis stage. Thermotolerance was well-correlated between growth stages among the eight genotypes for both CMS (r=0.95; p= 0.01) and TTC (r=0.92; p= 0.01). The correlation between TTC and CMS among the eight genotypes at seedling and anthesis stages was significant (r=0.95; p=0.01 and r =0.93; p= 0.01, respectively). The effect of heat stress on wheat genotypes selected on the basis of TTC and CMS thermotolerance ratings were evaluated. 1000-grain weight, grain filling duration (GFD) and grain filling rate (GFR) reduced under heat stress. The heat susceptibility index (S) revealed K-65 and Yangmai6 to be susceptible and NW-1014 and DBW-14 to be moderately tolerant to heat stress. GFR and 1000-grain weight were found to have highly significant positive correlation with CMS and TTC ratings at both seedling and anthesis stages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document