New genomically enhanced reproduction breeding values for Merino sheep allow targeted selection for conception rate, litter size and ewe rearing ability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Bunter ◽  
A. A. Swan ◽  
P. M. Gurman ◽  
D. J. Brown
2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 203 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Scholtz ◽  
S. W. P. Cloete ◽  
J. B. van Wyk ◽  
A. C. M. Kruger ◽  
T. C. de K. van der Linde

Divergent selection resulted in Merino lines that differ markedly for reproduction. These lines were selected from the same base population from 1986 to 2009. Selection was initially based on maternal ranking values for reproduction in both ewe and ram progeny. The maternal ranking scores were augmented by breeding values from a single-trait repeatability model since 2003. The site and severity of flystrike were recorded for mature breeding ewes in the flock from 2007 to 2009. The following details were captured: animal number, site of the strike (body or breech) and the severity of the strike (1 = mild to 5 = severe). Breech strikes amounted to 92.1% of all strikes and this trend was consistent across years. High-line ewes were less likely (P < 0.05) than low-line ewes to be suffering from breech strike. Ewes that suffered from breech strike during a reference year were more likely to be struck again during subsequent years, when compared with contemporaries not affected by breech strike in the reference year. When breech strike and body strike were assessed in a joint preliminary analysis, it seemed that body strike was generally more severe when diagnosed than breech strike. It was concluded that Merino sheep selected for improved reproduction for >20 years were less likely to be affected by breech strike than contemporaries selected for low reproduction.


1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Land ◽  
W. S. Russell ◽  
H. P. Donald

SUMMARYLitter size (number of lambs born per female lambing) of adult female Finnish Landrace and Tasmanian Merino sheep mated to males of either breed was 2·9 and 1·0 respectively. Breed of ram had a direct effect on the conception rate of the ewes to which they were mated—22% of ewes mated to Merino rams returned to oestrus but only 10% of those mated to Finn rams—but not on their litter size.A comparison of the reproductive performance of crossbred females with that of purebred contemporaries indicated that there was very little or no heterosis for litter size, the crossbreds being almost exactly intermediate between the parents. The proportion of females showing oestrus during the mating period, however, was lower in the Merinos than in the Finns and crossbreds. This was particularly noticeable in females put to the ram at around 6 months of age. Whereas 35 of 36 Finnish Landrace females and 46 of 49 crossbreds showed oestrus, only one of the 20 Merinos did so. At about 6 months of age therefore the crossbred females showed heterosis in the incidence of oestrus.


2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Estany ◽  
D. Villalba ◽  
M. Tor ◽  
D. Cubiló ◽  
J. L. Noguera

Nature ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 178 (4528) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
HELEN NEWTON TURNER

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMED H. FAHMY ◽  
JACQUES J. DUFOUR

Reproductive performance and body weight were studied on 361 ewes, representing Finnsheep (F), DLS (a population of 1/2 Dorset, 1/4 Leicester, 1/4 Suffolk) and seven combinations ranging from 1/8 to 7/8 Finnsheep breeding. Conception rate in yearlings was 61.5% for DLS compared to 89.0% for F with the crosses being intermediate. Conception rate in older ewes was similar in the different genetic groups (avg. 94%). Ovulation rate and litter size at birth of DLS ewes were 1.72 and 1.44 lambs, which was less than half those of F ewes (3.51 and 2.86 lambs, respectively). Both traits increased progressively with an increase in F breeding in crosses and with advances in age. DLS ewes weaned 1.22 lambs compared to 2.03 lambs for F ewes and 1.84 lambs for 4/8 F ewes. The heaviest litters at weaning (31.7 kg) were raised by 4/8 F ewes, followed by 7/8 F (30.8 kg) while those raised by DLS ewes weighed 23.0 kg and F ewes 29.1 kg. Percentage of ova lost per ewe mated averaged 24% and ranged between 18% (DLS and 1/8 F) and 29% (6/8 F). About 3.6% of lambs were born dead and a further 13.8% died before weaning. Preweaning mortality rate was highest in F (22.9%) and lowest in 3/8 F (9.4%). Average kilograms of lambs weaned per ewe exposed was highest in 4/8 F (27.6 kg) followed by F (26.0 kg), whereas that of DLS was the lowest at 18.1 kg. The 4/8 F cross showed 25% heterosis in kg of lambs weaned per ewe exposed and 52.5% increase over DLS. Significant positive linear regressions were calculated for ovulation rate, litter size and preweaning mortality rate on proportion of Finnsheep breeding in crosses. The relation was quadratic for percent ova lost and lamb mortality at weaning. Yearling DLS females weighted 36 kg compared to 44 kg for F yearlings. However, at 5 yr of age DLS ewes weighed 62 kg, 5 kg heavier than F ewes. The heaviest ewes at all ages were the 4/8 F (45 kg at 1 yr, 65 kg at 5 yr). Key words: Reproduction, DLS sheep, Finnsheep, crossbreeding, heterosis, repeatabilities


1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Anderson ◽  
M. K. Curran

ABSTRACTAn evaluation of the response to selection for prolificacy within a nucleus sheep flock of a commercial group-breeding scheme is presented. In 1979, the Romney Group Breeders formed a nucleus flock of 120 prolific ewes chosen from 12 contributing flocks. A control flock was established in 1982 from the same source. The analysis was conducted on the trait of litter size. Selection differentials are presented for each year of birth progeny group in both flocks. Expected selection response was calculated from selection differentials and was found to have an average value of 1·5% of parent mean litter size per year. Using least squares procedures the litter size performance of control and nucleus ewes of 2, 3 and 4 years of age was corrected for environmental effects. Realized response was estimated from the differences between corrected litter size means of control and nucleus flocks. Response in litter size was found to be significant within years and within ewe age groups (P < 0·05).


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-142
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmed ◽  
Hussain Yawr Hussain

Thirty-six local dose have been used and were divided in to three groups sacording to weight, in each group twelve dose. In the first group the weights of the dose were higher than ( 2.5 kgs) and less than (3 kgs). The second groups was higher than 3 kgs) and less than (3.5 kgs). The third group was higher than (3.5 kgs) and less than (4 kgs). The aim of this study was to obtain the effect of doe weight on her reproductive efficiency (gestation period, litter size, litter weight at birth and weaning, growth rate of offspring preweaning, conception rate and preweaning mortility).  The weight of the doe had no significant effect upon the gestation period and this period was 30.9, 31.2, 31.3 days for the three groups respectively, on the other hand the litter size was affected significantly by doe weight and litter size was at birth and preaweaning (5.1 , 5.8 and 6.2), (4.5, 5.3 and 5.7) for the three groups respectively. The offspring weight at birth and weaning was affected significantly by doe weight and this weight was (40.1 , 48.2 and 53.3 gms), (203.6, 227.5 and 233.8 gms) for the three groups respectively while the conception rate was not affected by doe weight. The mortility percentage in the prewaning period was not significantly by doe weight


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document