Cost transparency: which levers do you pull when we cannot trust the dials? The continued challenge of understanding what is really driving costs

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 581
Author(s):  
Jonathan Smith

In the past few years an industry-wide race towards achieving construction milestones took place, which drove behaviours of increased spending. Now the focus is on implementing low-cost operating models to optimise the move towards operations in a lower-priced oil world. KPMG’s recent work and research demonstrates that cost transparency is still a major issue in the upstream oil and gas industry for operators and non-operators. It is clear that it will be difficult to drive out costs and move to the lower cost baselines without significantly improving cost transparency in oil and gas organisations. In KPMG’s research, operators in Australia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) were asked about what challenges they saw, and how they were managing cost in the context of cost transparency. The focus of the research covered the following areas: how can you optimise costs if you don’t have transparency? defining the problem and its boundaries; external influences; internal influences and reactions; the increased scrutiny from joint venture partners; the challenge to developing a cost culture; and, the barriers and enablers. Also, the oil and gas industry has invested heavily in a safety first culture. It has made enormous improvements and the culture is permanent. It could be argued that if the industry put a fraction of the same energy in to building a cost conscious culture then it will weather the lower oil price world so much better.

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (07) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Nigel Jenvey

Have you noticed the change in the oil and gas industry over the past year with its engagement in carbon management, decarbonization, and net-zero-emissions targets? Policy support and technology advances in alternative energies have delivered massive cost reduction in renewables more quickly, and to a greater degree, than expected. Over the past few years, more of the world’s capital has been spent on electricity than oil and gas sup-ply, and more than half of all new energy-generation capacity is now renewable. Some elements of society, therefore, have suggested that this is the beginning of the end for the fossil-fuel sector and call for investors to turn away from oil and gas and “leave it in the ground.” In more than a century of almost continuous change, however, the oil and gas industry has a long track record of innovative thinking, creative solutions, and different business models. SPE papers and events that covered decarbonization during the past year show that a wide variety of solutions already exist that avoid, reduce, replace, offset, or sequester greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is clear, therefore, that decarbonization technologies will now be as important as 4D seismic, horizontal wells, and hydraulic fracturing. That is why we now bring you this inaugural Technology Focus feature dedicated to decarbonization. The experience and capability of the entire JPT community in decarbonization is critical. Please enjoy the following summary of three selected papers on the role of natural gas in fuel-switching; carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS); and hydrogen technologies that deliver the dual challenge of providing more energy with less GHG emission. There are many ways to engage in the SPE decarbonization efforts in the remainder of 2021. Regional events have addressed CCUS, hydrogen, geothermal, and methane. There is also the new SPE Gaia sustainability program to enable and empower all members who wish to engage in the alignment of the future of energy with sustainable development. The Gaia program has an on-demand library of materials, including an existing series on methane, and upcoming similar events on other energy transition, natural capital and regeneration, and social responsibility priorities. Get involved through your SPE section or chapter or contact your regional Gaia liaison to find out what Gaia programming you can support or lead at www.spe.org/en/gaia.


Author(s):  
Warren Brown ◽  
Geoff Evans ◽  
Lorna Carpenter

Over the course of the past 20 years, methods have been developed for assessing the probability and root cause of bolted joint leakage based on sound engineering assessment techniques. Those methods were incorporated, in part, into ASME PCC-1-2010 Appendix O [7] and provide the only published standard method for establishing bolted joint assembly bolt load. As detailed in previous papers, the method can also be used for troubleshooting joint leakage. This paper addresses a series of actual joint leakage cases, outlines the analysis performed to determine root cause of failure and the actions taken to successfully eliminate future incidents of failure (lessons learned).


2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 309 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.I. Mackie ◽  
S.H. Begg ◽  
C. Smith ◽  
M.B. Welsh

Business underperformance in the upstream oil and gas industry, and the failure of many decisions to return expected results, has led to a growing interest over the past few years in understanding the impacts of decisionmaking tools and processes and their relationship to decision outcomes. A primary observation is that different decision types require different decision-making approaches to achieve optimal outcomes.Optimal decision making relies on understanding the types of decisions being made and tailoring the type of decision with the appropriate tools and processes. Yet the industry lacks both a definition of decision types and any guidelines as to what tools and processes should be used for what decisions types. We argue that maximising the chances of a good outcome in real-world decisions requires the implementation of such tailoring.


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Brent Steedman

The Australian oil and gas industry is in a period of substantial challenges, including a significant decline in oil prices, fluctuating spot gas prices, a relentless drive for operating efficiency, and tight capital allocation, together with increased regulatory scrutiny and a reputation for below-standards productivity. On the upside, these market challenges provide significant opportunities for companies to bring in new investors, implement new operating models, apply innovation to update processes and practices, and restructure activities. Making material step-changes, requires companies to review, amend, and update joint venture operating agreements (JVOAs). KPMG has worked with many of Australia’s leading oil and gas companies on a range of joint venture engagements. This extended abstract outlines why JVOAs need to be reviewed with respect to the following key opportunities and challenges: Fast-changing global business operating models. Available cost savings by eliminating inconsistent management and operating models between joint ventures. Planning for potential restructuring, including separation of infrastructure (e.g. plants, pipelines, support) from reserve ownership. Sharing of services (e.g. maintenance and logistics) between unrelated joint ventures. Transparency of costs and asset performance. Improved joint venture governance (not more or over-governance) between participants to attract investment. Effective resourcing, noting the right transition of capabilities between deal-makers and joint venture operators. With this extended abstract the authors aim to provide ideas for consideration. Each of these ideas will impact JVOAs. The authors’ proposition is that now is the right time to complete a comprehensive review of JVOAs to enable organisations to move fast as new and innovative opportunities arise.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Gareth D. Lee ◽  
Simon P. Whitaker ◽  
Martin Wilkes

The issue of poor project performance in the oil and gas industry is not new. It has been discussed since the 1980s and, over the past 30 years, there has been considerable effort put into improving project outcomes. As an industry, we have invested heavily in project management and estimating processes to ensure that reliable data are available for investment decisions. However, recent experience in Australia and elsewhere in the world suggests that little real improvement has been made. This presentation critically examines aspects of project performance and decision making by analysing: the commercial impact that recent cost and schedule outcomes have had on Australian projects; common problems associated with setting and managing cost and schedule expectations throughout the project development process; real (anonymous) examples from projects to indicate how biases affect behaviours, decisions and outcomes; and simple ways to build a more realistic assessment of risk and uncertainty into cost and schedule estimates. We conclude by discussing why this is still important for future Australian projects given the days of complex greenfield megaprojects are likely behind us.


2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 516
Author(s):  
James MacGinley ◽  
Brad Calleja

In recent years, Australia has gone through an unprecedented expansion in its oil and gas industry. The demand for capital has been enormous and has resulted in some of the largest project debt financings globally. In the coming years, the funding requirement will change dramatically as projects reach completion; become cash-flow positive; and, owners changing their funding structure from project finance debt to lower cost, lower covenant corporate debt. The development of a number of Australia’s largest oil and gas projects during the past five years coincided with a tightening of capital from the traditional project finance market. This lead to the emergence of export credit agency financing as an integral component of project development. During the past year, however, re-capitalisation of global banks are now re-entering the Australian market and are driving competition and increasing liquidity. This extended abstract covers a review of the funding approaches taken on major Australian LNG projects, including lessons from the funding of CSG projects that may be relevant to other new development markets such as shale gas. It also draws on historical lessons of funding new technologies and provide insight about funding of the next wave of LNG development: floating LNG. The National Australia Bank is one of the largest resources project finance banks globally and is well positioned to provide APPEA’s delegates with relevant insight about the future of debt funding in the oil and gas industry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 992 ◽  
pp. 336-340
Author(s):  
V.A. Gafarova ◽  
J. V. Bazrova ◽  
L.Z. Teltsova

Over the past fifteen years, Russian and foreign scientists have conducted a large amount of research in the development and use of composite materials based on epoxy resins, including the ways to restore structural integrity. In the oil and gas industry, composite materials are used for repair works.


Author(s):  
Zenovii Zadorozhnyi ◽  
Valentyna Orlova ◽  
Sofiia Kafka

The research paper reveals the essence of the concepts of joint activity, joint operation, and joint venture. A set of key features for classification of joint activities is identified and their impact on accounting of joint activities is assessed. The article also reviews the essential elements of accounting of joint activities in the light of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and characterizes the process of recording accounting entries related to basic operations, which depend on organizational forms of joint activities (a joint venture or a joint operation, with or without a separate entity). The paper provides a detailed description of three options for accounting of joint activities classified as joint operations, namely: joint operations without a separate entity; joint operations with a separate entity but without legal personality; a legal unit. Besides, a number of particular characteristics of measuring financial results from selling and purchasing assets within joint operations are identified. It is pointed out that one of the ways of effective use of fixed assets is promoting the implementation of managerial ac- counting of joint activities and internal reporting procedures of the results achieved. It is suggested that domestic enterprises of oil and gas industry should expand the practice of joint activities in order to effectively use fixed assets for oil and gas extraction and transportation. Before conducting joint activities, it is recommended that oil and gas industry enterprises compile initial calculations of their profitability at the level of managerial accounting. In the study, the following general and specific scientific methods of obtaining knowledge on economic phenomena are used: generalization, grouping and comparison, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, etc.


1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
W. G. Brown

Although the concept of a joint venture is one of joint action, joint venture agreements in use in the oil and gas industry contain provisions for independent operations. This article discusses the need for independent operations clauses, the types of independent operations clauses, including obligatory operations clauses, the types of penalties and general problems which should be considered in the drafting of independent operations clauses. The article concludes with an analysis of the challenge of operator provisions in joint operating agreements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document