A Cooper Basin simulation study of flow-back after hydraulic fracturing in tight gas wells

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sume Sarkar ◽  
Manouchehr Haghighi ◽  
Mohammad Sayyafzadeh ◽  
Dennis Cooke ◽  
Kunakorn Pokalai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Fluid Injection ◽  
Drainage Pattern ◽  
Gas Wells ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Fracture Fluid ◽  
Cooper Basin

After fluid injection (slickwater) during hydraulic fracturing, the flow-back of fracture fluid is necessary before gas production starts. A review of fracture treatments indicates that the incomplete return of treating fluids is a reason for the failure of hydraulic fracturing and is associated with poor gas production. The aim of this study is to investigate the parameters that limit flow-back in low permeability gas wells in the Cooper Basin. The authors used numerical simulation to find the critical controlling parameters to introduce the best practice for maximising the flow-back in the Cooper Basin. Several 3D and multiphase flow simulation models were constructed for three wells in the Patchawarra Formation during fracture fluid injection, soaking time and during flow-back. All models were validated using history matching with the production data. The results show that the drainage pattern is distinctly different in the following directions: vertically upward, vertically downward, and horizontal along the fracture half-length and along the matrix. The lowest recovery is observed during the upward vertical displacements due to poor sweep efficiency. Furthermore, it is observed that drawdown does not influence the recovery significantly for upward displacements. Surface tension reduction, however, can improve sweep efficiency and improve recovery considerably. Also, the wettability of the rocks has a significant impact on ultimate recovery when the effect of gravity is dominant. The authors conclude that a significant amount of injected fluid is trapped in the formation because of poor sweep efficiency and formation of gas fingers, which results from low mobility ratio and gravity segregation.

Simulation of hydraulic fracturing with propane-based fluid using a fracture propagation model coupled with multiphase flow simulation in the Cooper Basin, South Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Fei ◽  
Mary Gonzalez Perdomo ◽  
Viet Quoc Nguyen ◽  
Zhongyu Lei ◽  
Kunakorn Pokalai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiphase Flow ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Fracture Propagation ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Propagation Model ◽  
Unconventional Reservoirs ◽  
Fracturing Fluids ◽  
Water Based ◽  
Cooper Basin

In many unconventional reservoirs, gas wells do not perform to their potential when water-based fracturing fluids are used for treatments. The sub-optimal fracture productivity can be attributed to many factors such as effective fracture length loss, low load fluid recovery, flowback time, and water availability. The development of unconventional reservoirs has, therefore, prompted the industry to reconsider waterless fracturing treatments as viable alternatives to water-based fracturing fluids. In this paper, a simulation approach was used by coupling a fracture propagation model with a multiphase flow model. The Toolachee Formation is a tight sand in the Cooper Basin, around 7,200 ft in depth, and has been targeted for gas production. In this study, a 3D hydraulic fracture propagation model was first developed to provide fracture dimensions and conductivity. Then, from an offset well injection fall off test, the model was tuned by using different calibration parameters such as fracture gradient and closure pressure to validate the model. Finally, fracture propagation model outputs were used as the inputs for multiphase flow reservoir simulation. A large number of cases were simulated based on different fraccing fluids and the concept of permeability jail to represent several water-induced damage effects. It was found that LPG was a successful treatment, especially in a reservoir where the authors suspected the presence of permeability jails. The authors also observed that total flowback recovery approached 76% within 60 days in the case of using gelled LPG. Modelling predictions also support the need for high-quality foam, and LPG can be expected to bring long-term productivity gains in normal tight gas relative permeability behaviour.

PETROLEUM AND HOT DRY ROCK: TWO TYPES OF ENERGY SHARING COMMONALITIES

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 830 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Narayan ◽  
D. Naseby ◽  
Z. Yang ◽  
S.S. Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Geothermal Energy ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Mode Fracture ◽  
Hot Dry Rock ◽  
Cooper Basin

The Cooper Basin is the largest gas-producing basin in Australia and hosts a huge volume of natural gas in low permeability (known as 'tight gas') sandstone formations. Hydraulic fracture treatments, based on 'opening mode' fracture mechanics, are routinely carried out to unlock tight gas and to accelerate its recovery. Information regarding insitu stresses and natural fractures is required for successful fracture treatments. However, hydraulic fracturing is still often problematic, in part due to the relatively high insitu stresses and temperatures in the region. A vast amount of Hot Dry Rock (HDR) geothermal energy resources exists in granites below the sedimentary rocks in the Cooper Basin. Exploitation of HDR requires the same drilling and completion technologies as used in the petroleum industry. Hydraulic fracturing is also necessary for HDR reservoir creation, and requires characterisation of insitu stresses and natural fractures, as does tight gas production. It has been realised that the mechanism for reservoir stimulation in granitic rocks is proppant free shear dilation that is related to 'sliding mode' fracture mechanics. Furthermore, seismic imaging of hydraulic fracture propagation is well established in the HDR industry. These two technologies, developed in HDR, may have potential application to the petroleum industry for tight gas production. The geographic proximity of tight gas and HDR geothermal energy in the Cooper Basin and common exploitation technologies should justify close collaboration between the petroleum industry and HDR researchers.

Modeling Fracture-Fluid Cleanup in Tight-Gas Wells

SPE Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 783-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Yilin* Wang ◽  
Stephen A. Holditch ◽  
Duane A. McVay
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Gas Wells ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Gas Recovery ◽  
Modeling Fracture ◽  
Fracture Fluid

Summary On occasion, a hydraulically fractured tight-gas well does not perform up to its potential because of slow or incomplete fracture- fluid cleanup. A number of papers have been written to address individual factors related to fracture-fluid cleanup, but many questions as to which factors mostly affect gas production from such wells remain unanswered. Numerical reservoir simulation is one of the best methods to study the fracture-fluid-cleanup problem. Continuing from our previous publication (Wang et al. 2008) on the effect of gel damage on fracture cleanup, we used reservoir simulation to analyze systematically the factors that affect fracture- fluid cleanup and gas recovery from tight-gas wells. We first developed a comprehensive data set for typical tight gas reservoirs and then ran single-phase-flow cases for each reservoir and fracture scenario to establish the idealized base-case gas recovery. We then systematically evaluated the following factors: multiphase gas and water flow, proppant crushing, polymer filter cake, and, finally, yield stress of concentrated gel in the fracture. The gel in the fracture is concentrated because of fluid leakoff during the fracture treatment. We evaluated these factors additively in the order listed. We found that the most important factor that reduces fracture-fluid cleanup and gas recovery is the gel strength of the fluid that remains in the fracture at the end of the treatment. This paper illustrates the complexity of the fracture-fluid- cleanup problem and points out the need to use reservoir simulation and to include all the pertinent factors to model fracture-fluid cleanup rigorously. The procedures presented can provide a useful, systematic guide to engineers in conducting a numerical simulation study of fracture-fluid cleanup.

Simulation of proppant transport and fracture plugging in the framework of a radial hydraulic fracturing model

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-339
Author(s):  
Vasily N. Lapin ◽  
Denis V. Esipov
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Fluid Injection ◽  
Subtraction Technique ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Proppant Transport ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture Propagation

AbstractHydraulic fracturing technology is widely used in the oil and gas industry. A part of the technology consists in injecting a mixture of proppant and fluid into the fracture. Proppant significantly increases the viscosity of the injected mixture and can cause plugging of the fracture. In this paper we propose a numerical model of hydraulic fracture propagation within the framework of the radial geometry taking into account the proppant transport and possible plugging. The finite difference method and the singularity subtraction technique near the fracture tip are used in the numerical model. Based on the simulation results it was found that depending on the parameters of the rock, fluid, and fluid injection rate, the plugging can be caused by two reasons. A parameter was introduced to separate these two cases. If this parameter is large enough, then the plugging occurs due to reaching the maximum possible concentration of proppant far from the fracture tip. If its value is small, then the plugging is caused by the proppant reaching a narrow part of the fracture near its tip. The numerical experiments give an estimate of the radius of the filled with proppant part of the fracture for various injection rates and leakages into the rock.

Wettability Alteration to Intermediate Gas-Wetting in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs at High Temperatures

SPE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 397-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mashhad Mousa Fahes ◽  
Abbas Firoozabadi
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Absolute Permeability ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Well ◽  
Water Blocking

Summary Wettability of two types of sandstone cores, Berea (permeability on the order of 600 md), and a reservoir rock (permeability on the order of 10 md), is altered from liquid-wetting to intermediate gas-wetting at a high temperature of 140C. Previous work on wettability alteration to intermediate gas-wetting has been limited to 90C. In this work, chemicals previously used at 90C for wettability alteration are found to be ineffective at 140C. New chemicals are used which alter wettability at high temperatures. The results show that:wettability could be permanently altered from liquid-wetting to intermediate gas-wetting at high reservoir temperatures,wettability alteration has a substantial effect on increasing liquid mobility at reservoir conditions,wettability alteration results in improved gas productivity, andwettability alteration does not have a measurable effect on the absolute permeability of the rock for some chemicals. We also find the reservoir rock, unlike Berea, is not strongly water-wet in the gas/water/rock system. Introduction A sharp reduction in gas well deliverability is often observed in many low-permeability gas-condensate reservoirs even at very high reservoir pressure. The decrease in well deliverability is attributed to condensate accumulation (Hinchman and Barree 1985; Afidick et al. 1994) and water blocking (Engineer 1985; Cimolai et al. 1983). As the pressure drops below the dewpoint, liquid accumulates around the wellbore in high saturations, reducing gas relative permeability (Barnum et al. 1995; El-Banbi et al. 2000); the result is a decrease in the gas production rate. Several techniques have been used to increase gas well deliverability after the initial decline. Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase absolute permeability (Haimson and Fairhurst 1969). Solvent injection is implemented in order to remove the accumulated liquid (Al-Anazi et al. 2005). Gas deliverability often increases after the reduction of the condensate saturation around the wellbore. In a successful methanol treatment in Hatter's Pond field in Alabama (Al-Anazi et al. 2005), after the initial decline in well deliverability by a factor of three to five owing to condensate blocking, gas deliverability increased by a factor of two after the removal of water and condensate liquids from the near-wellbore region. The increased rates were, however, sustained for a period of 4 months only. The approach is not a permanent solution to the problem, because the condensate bank will form again. On the other hand, when hydraulic fracturing is used by injecting aqueous fluids, the cleanup of water accumulation from the formation after fracturing is essential to obtain an increased productivity. Water is removed in two phases: immiscible displacement by gas, followed by vaporization by the expanding gas flow (Mahadevan and Sharma 2003). Because of the low permeability and the wettability characteristics, it may take a long time to perform the cleanup; in some cases, as little as 10 to 15% of the water load could be recovered (Mahadevan and Sharma 2003; Penny et al. 1983). Even when the problem of water blocking is not significant, the accumulation of condensate around the fracture face when the pressure falls below dewpoint pressure could result in a reduction in the gas production rate (Economides et al. 1989; Sognesand 1991; Baig et al. 2005).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document