Heart Failure Integrated Care Project: overcoming barriers encountered by primary health care providers in heart failure management

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Victar Hsieh ◽  
Glenn Paull ◽  
Barbara Hawkshaw

ObjectiveHeart failure (HF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of HF patients will have repeated hospital presentations. Effective integration between general practice and existing HF management programs may address some of the challenges in optimising care for this complex patient population. The Heart Failure Integrated Care Project (HFICP) investigated the barriers encountered by primary healthcare providers in providing care to patients with HF in the community. MethodsFive general practices in the St George and Sutherland regions (NSW, Australia) that employed practice nurses (PNs) were enrolled in the project. Participants responded to a printed survey that asked about their perceived role in the management of HF patients and their current knowledge and confidence in managing this condition. Participants also took part in a focus group meeting and were asked to identify barriers to improving HF patient management in general practice, and to offer suggestions about how the project could assist them to overcome those barriers. ResultsBarriers to effective delivery of HF management in general practice included clinical factors (consultation time limitations, underutilisation of patient management systems, identifying patients with HF, lack of patient self-care materials), professional factors (suboptimal hospital discharge summary letters, underutilisation of PNs), organisation factors (difficulties in communication with hospital staff, lack of education regarding HF management) and system issues (no Medicare rebate for B-type natriuretic peptide testing, insufficient Medicare rebate for using PN in chronic disease management). ConclusionsThe HFICP identified several barriers to improving integrated management for HF patients in the Australian setting. These findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between hospitals and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients. What is known about the topic?Multidisciplinary HF programs are heterogeneous in their structures, they have low patient participation rates and a significant proportion of HF patients have further presentations to hospital with HF. Integrating the care of HF patients into the primary care system following hospital admission remains challenging. What does this paper add?This paper identified several factors that hinder the effective delivery of care by primary care providers to patients with HF. What are the implications for practitioners?The findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between tertiary health facilities and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Crimmins ◽  
Lydia Elliott ◽  
Darren T. Absher

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-limiting disease that is prevalent and burdensome. All major cardiology societies and international clinical practice guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) interventions alongside usual HF management. Objectives: The purpose of this review of the literature was to evaluate the various barriers to the early initiation of PC for HF patients in the primary care setting. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to assess and incorporate the diverse sources of literature available. An EBSCO search identified relevant articles in the following databases: Medline complete, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and SocINDEX. The search was limited to full text, peer reviewed, English only, and published between 2010 and 2019. Results: Barriers to the integration of PC for HF patients include poor communication between provider/patient and interdisciplinary providers, the misperception and miseducation of what PC is and how it can be incorporated into patient care, the unpredictable disease trajectory of HF, and the limited time allowed for patient care in the primary care setting. Conclusion: The results of this review highlight a lack of communication, time, and knowledge as barriers to delivering PC. Primary care providers caring for patients with HF need to establish an Annual Heart Failure Review to meticulously evaluate symptoms and allow the time for communication involving prognosis, utilize a PC referral screening tool such as the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure, and thoroughly understand the benefits and appropriate integration of PC.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C Ely ◽  
Christie A Befort ◽  
Angela Banitt Duncan ◽  
Jianghua He ◽  
Cheryl Gibson ◽  
...  

Background. Obesity is a chronic disease of epidemic proportions. Primary care providers are on the front line of diagnosing and treating obesity and need better tools to deliver top-notch obesity care. Methods. A pilot randomized trial was conducted to test a chronic care model (CCM) program for obesity compared to usual care. Primary care patients, 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) between 27 and 45 were enrolled. Sixteen weekly 90-minute group office visits were structured with the first 30 minutes encompassing individualized clinical assessments and the final 60 minutes containing the group-based standardized intensive lifestyle training. The primary outcome was weight change at 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were weight change at 24 weeks, change in diet and physical activity behaviors, self-efficacy for weight control behaviors, and physiologic markers of cardiovascular risk at 16 and 24 weeks. Results. The participants (19 in the active arm and 10 in the control arm) were 49.8 ± 11.5 years old (mean ± SD), 97% women, 55% white, and 41% black. Weight change in the control arm at week 16 was 0.25+ 2.21 kg (mean + SD) and that for the active arm was -5.74 + 4.50 kg (n=16). The difference between the two arms was significant (p = 0.0002). Both the intent-to-treat analysis using the last observation carried forward approach and the analysis including completers only provided similar siginificant results. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that a CCM program incorporating group office visits was feasible and effective for obesity treatment in primary care settings.


Sexual Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Shackleton ◽  
Lorna Sutcliffe ◽  
Claudia Estcourt

Background: Partner notification in primary care is problematic and of limited effectiveness despite enthusiasm from primary care providers to engage with sexually transmissible infection (STI) management. Innovative partner notification strategies must be relevant to the primary care context. The aim of the present study was to explore the opinions of general practitioners (GP) and practice nurses on the acceptability and feasibility of a new form of partner notification developed in the specialist setting known as Accelerated Partner Therapy (APT), for sex partners of those diagnosed with a bacterial STI in general practice. APT is defined as partner notification strategies that reduce time for sex partners to be treated, and include partner assessment by appropriately qualified health care professionals and here involve telephone and community pharmacy assessment. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of GP and practice nurses in East London, UK. Results: All participants appreciated the importance of partner notification in STI management and felt that APT would improve their practice. They supported prioritising antibiotic provision for the sex partners with provision for future comprehensive STI screening. Although both models were acceptable and feasible, the majority preferred the sexual health clinic telephone assessment over the pharmacy model. Conclusions: GP and practice nurses welcome new strategies for partner notification and believe APT could provide rapid and convenient treatment of sex partners in general practice. This supports further evaluation of APT models as a partner notification strategy in primary care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Jo Anne Sirey

For decades, depression in older adults was overlooked and not treated. Most treatment was by primary care providers and typically poorly managed. Recent interventions that integrate mental health services into primary care have increased the number of patients who are treated for depression and the quality of that treatment. The most effective models involve systematic depression screening and monitoring, multidisciplinary teams that include primary care providers and mental health specialists, a depression care manager to work directly with patients over time and the use of guideline-based depression treatment. The article reviews the challenges and opportunities for providing high-quality depression treatment in primary care; describes the 3 major integrated care interventions, PRISM-E, IMPACT, and PROSPECT; reviews the evidence of their effectiveness, and adaptations of the model for other conditions and settings; and explores strategies to increase their scalability into real world practice.


Author(s):  
Patricia Pade ◽  
Laura Martin ◽  
Sophie Collins

Addiction and substance use disorders (SUDs) are extremely prevalent and are commonly encountered in the primary care setting. The traditional separation of SUD treatment from mainstream medicine has not been an optimal model of effective patient care. Primary care providers can play a crucial role in the recognition, intervention, and treatment of SUDs. This chapter provides an overview of the assessment process, intervention strategies, and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments that can be effectively implemented in an integrated care environment or primary care setting for a variety of SUDs. The integration of SUD treatment into integrated care environments holds the promise of improving acceptability to patients, decreasing the stigmatization of SUDs, enhancing satisfaction for providers, and improving outcomes for patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joselyn Law

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) have a highly interconnected relationship with similar risk factors and shared pathophysiology. They often occur together and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the presence of one condition has implications for the treatment of the other. Guidelines exist for each disease, however, do not provide clarity when treating the conditions together. Due to the complex nature of the combined diseases, management requires a systematic and collaborative approach in primary care settings. The integrative review seeks to explore the following question, “How can the nurse practitioner (NP) best manage HF patients with AF in outpatient settings to help reduce the burden on the healthcare system?” A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken and 20 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The review findings provide insight into the diverse treatment options available to persons living with concomitant AF and HF. From the literature, catheter ablation, an invasive and specialized procedure, emerged as a superior treatment strategy for patients with combined AF and HF, particularly when compared the pharmacotherapy of rate and/or rhythm control. The management of AF in the setting of HF requires a collaborative approach between primary care providers (PCP) as well as specialists that are able to help manage the population of interest, such as cardiologist and electrophysiologists. Recommendations for practice, education, research, and policy have been made to support the role of PCPs, including NPs, in the management of AF in the HF population.


Author(s):  
Christopher Schneck

Primary care clinics are the de facto treatment settings for patients with major depression and bipolar disorder. Primary care patients with mood disorders are more difficult to assess and treat than patients without such disorders, often have comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, and require greater practice resources for optimal management. Because current treatment of mood disorder patients in primary care settings is often minimally adequate, changes in overall management strategies are needed to improve outcomes. This chapter describes pathways by which primary care providers can implement an integrated care and collaborative model likely to improve patient outcomes. It describes the epidemiology and costs of mood disorders, as well as basic pharmacologic and psychosocial approaches useful in primary care settings. Depressed patients who are refractory to treatment and patients with bipolar disorder are more complicated to manage and almost always require collaboration with a behavioral health specialist and a consulting psychiatrist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document