Training Psychologists and Primary Care Providers in Integrated Care

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Cubic
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

Heart Failure Integrated Care Project: overcoming barriers encountered by primary health care providers in heart failure management

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Victar Hsieh ◽  
Glenn Paull ◽  
Barbara Hawkshaw
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Care Project ◽  
Effective Delivery

ObjectiveHeart failure (HF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of HF patients will have repeated hospital presentations. Effective integration between general practice and existing HF management programs may address some of the challenges in optimising care for this complex patient population. The Heart Failure Integrated Care Project (HFICP) investigated the barriers encountered by primary healthcare providers in providing care to patients with HF in the community. MethodsFive general practices in the St George and Sutherland regions (NSW, Australia) that employed practice nurses (PNs) were enrolled in the project. Participants responded to a printed survey that asked about their perceived role in the management of HF patients and their current knowledge and confidence in managing this condition. Participants also took part in a focus group meeting and were asked to identify barriers to improving HF patient management in general practice, and to offer suggestions about how the project could assist them to overcome those barriers. ResultsBarriers to effective delivery of HF management in general practice included clinical factors (consultation time limitations, underutilisation of patient management systems, identifying patients with HF, lack of patient self-care materials), professional factors (suboptimal hospital discharge summary letters, underutilisation of PNs), organisation factors (difficulties in communication with hospital staff, lack of education regarding HF management) and system issues (no Medicare rebate for B-type natriuretic peptide testing, insufficient Medicare rebate for using PN in chronic disease management). ConclusionsThe HFICP identified several barriers to improving integrated management for HF patients in the Australian setting. These findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between hospitals and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients. What is known about the topic?Multidisciplinary HF programs are heterogeneous in their structures, they have low patient participation rates and a significant proportion of HF patients have further presentations to hospital with HF. Integrating the care of HF patients into the primary care system following hospital admission remains challenging. What does this paper add?This paper identified several factors that hinder the effective delivery of care by primary care providers to patients with HF. What are the implications for practitioners?The findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between tertiary health facilities and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients.

scholarly journals Integrated Care for Depression in Older Primary Care Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Jo Anne Sirey
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Effective Models

For decades, depression in older adults was overlooked and not treated. Most treatment was by primary care providers and typically poorly managed. Recent interventions that integrate mental health services into primary care have increased the number of patients who are treated for depression and the quality of that treatment. The most effective models involve systematic depression screening and monitoring, multidisciplinary teams that include primary care providers and mental health specialists, a depression care manager to work directly with patients over time and the use of guideline-based depression treatment. The article reviews the challenges and opportunities for providing high-quality depression treatment in primary care; describes the 3 major integrated care interventions, PRISM-E, IMPACT, and PROSPECT; reviews the evidence of their effectiveness, and adaptations of the model for other conditions and settings; and explores strategies to increase their scalability into real world practice.

Treating Substance Use Disorders in Integrated Care Settings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Pade ◽  
Laura Martin ◽  
Sophie Collins
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Substance Use Disorders ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Environment

Addiction and substance use disorders (SUDs) are extremely prevalent and are commonly encountered in the primary care setting. The traditional separation of SUD treatment from mainstream medicine has not been an optimal model of effective patient care. Primary care providers can play a crucial role in the recognition, intervention, and treatment of SUDs. This chapter provides an overview of the assessment process, intervention strategies, and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments that can be effectively implemented in an integrated care environment or primary care setting for a variety of SUDs. The integration of SUD treatment into integrated care environments holds the promise of improving acceptability to patients, decreasing the stigmatization of SUDs, enhancing satisfaction for providers, and improving outcomes for patients.

Treating Depression and Bipolar Disorder in Integrated Care Settings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Schneck
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Psychosocial Approaches

Primary care clinics are the de facto treatment settings for patients with major depression and bipolar disorder. Primary care patients with mood disorders are more difficult to assess and treat than patients without such disorders, often have comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, and require greater practice resources for optimal management. Because current treatment of mood disorder patients in primary care settings is often minimally adequate, changes in overall management strategies are needed to improve outcomes. This chapter describes pathways by which primary care providers can implement an integrated care and collaborative model likely to improve patient outcomes. It describes the epidemiology and costs of mood disorders, as well as basic pharmacologic and psychosocial approaches useful in primary care settings. Depressed patients who are refractory to treatment and patients with bipolar disorder are more complicated to manage and almost always require collaboration with a behavioral health specialist and a consulting psychiatrist.

A.C.T. like a champion: Primary care providers' responses to an integrated care initiative

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
JenniferLanghinrichsenRohling JenniferLanghinrichsenRohling ◽  
CandiceSelwyn CandiceSelwyn ◽  
HeatherFinnegan HeatherFinnegan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

The Perspective of Older Men With Depression on Suicide and Its Prevention in Primary Care

Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Vannoy ◽  
Mijung Park ◽  
Meredith R. Maroney ◽  
Jürgen Unützer ◽  
Ester Carolina Apesoa-Varano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Self Image ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Background: Suicide rates in older men are higher than in the general population, yet their utilization of mental health services is lower. Aims: This study aimed to describe: (a) what primary care providers (PCPs) can do to prevent late-life suicide, and (b) older men's attitudes toward discussing suicide with a PCP. Method: Thematic analysis of interviews focused on depression and suicide with 77 depressed, low-socioeconomic status, older men of Mexican origin, or US-born non-Hispanic whites recruited from primary care. Results: Several themes inhibiting suicide emerged: it is a problematic solution, due to religious prohibition, conflicts with self-image, the impact on others; and, lack of means/capacity. Three approaches to preventing suicide emerged: talking with them about depression, talking about the impact of their suicide on others, and encouraging them to be active. The vast majority, 98%, were open to such conversations. An unexpected theme spontaneously arose: "What prevents men from acting on suicidal thoughts?" Conclusion: Suicide is rarely discussed in primary care encounters in the context of depression treatment. Our study suggests that older men are likely to be open to discussing suicide with their PCP. We have identified several pragmatic approaches to assist clinicians in reducing older men's distress and preventing suicide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document