scholarly journals An audit of the use of epidural injections for back pain and sciatica

2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Jackson ◽  
Norman Broadhurst ◽  
and Nikolai Bogduk

An audit was conducted to determine if epidural injections for back pain and sciatica were practised in accordance with guidelines prescribed by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). More than 80% of injections were used for conditions for which they were not indicated, and which the NHMRC considers experimental. Most commonly, epidural injections afforded no benefit to the patients, yet were often repeated. In no instance was informed consent recorded as recommended by the NHMRC. The practice of epidural injections is dissonant both with the evidence-based literature and with recommended guidelines, and squanders both financial and professional resources.

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Duggan

The National Health and Medical Research Council has recently issued guidelines on colo-rectal cancer, and givensignificant support to Colorectal Cancer Screening. However, the evidence of cost-effectiveness is inconclusiveaccording to the Cochrane Centre.I argue that it would be wise to undertake trials that are appropriately funded. Otherwise, there is a risk that muchmoney will be spent that cannot subsequently be justified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document