Evidence-based clinical guidelines submitted to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for the management of acute low back pain: A critical review

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynton G.F. Giles
The Lancet ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 370 (9599) ◽  
pp. 1595-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart W Koes

Spine ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 2615-2622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McGuirk ◽  
Wade King ◽  
Jayantilal Govind ◽  
John Lowry ◽  
Nikolai Bogduk

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laran Chetty

Low back pain (LBP) remains one of the most common and challenging musculoskeletal conditions encountered by health care professionals and is a leading cause of absenteeism. Clinical guidelines are often considered best evidence in health care. The aim of this critical review was to assess the quality and recommendations of LBP guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Electronic databases were used to identify LBP guidelines published between 2000 and 2015. Nine guidelines were selected for review from a total of 17. Only five guidelines effectively addressed the AGREE scoring. On the basis of the appraisal and domain scores, only four guidelines were strongly recommended. Improved translation of research evidence from guidelines to clinical practice is needed.


Physiotherapy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
Michael J Rose ◽  
Gillian M Beattie

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violeta Gonz�lez-Urzelai ◽  
Loreto Palacio-Elua ◽  
Josefina L�pez-de-Munain

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv Inger Strand ◽  
Alice Kvale ◽  
Målfrid Råheim ◽  
Anne Elisabeth Ljunggren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document