Use of residual fertiliser 15N in soil for isotope dilution estimates of N2 fixation by grain legumes

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 821 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Pilbeam ◽  
H. C. Harris ◽  
R. S. Swift ◽  
A. M. McNeill

Estimates of the proportion of nitrogen (N) derived from the atmosphere (pNatm) by chickpea and lentil in the alternate phase of a cereal-legume 2-year rotation, for each of 3 seasons (1993, 1994, and 1995) in northern Syria, were obtained from isotope dilution methodology using residual fertiliser 15N in the soil (IDres). The 15N had been immobilised, during the year antecedent to the legume, from 15N-enriched fertiliser which had been applied at sowing to wheat in the cereal phase of the rotation at 30 kg N/ha. For lentil in 1994, and for chickpea in 1993 and 1994, the IDres estimates of pNatm were compared with those obtained by using the classical 15N isotope dilution method (ID) where 15N-enriched fertiliser (either 30 or 10 kg N/ha) was added at sowing to both the legume and non-fixing reference crops. Estimates of pNatm for 1994 from the 2 methodological approaches were significantly (P < 0 ·01) different for lentil, with ID resulting in a higher estimate than IDres (0·92 v. 0·85). For chickpea in the same season (1994) the IDres estimate was significantly higher than the ID estimate (0· 88 v. 0·78) at 30 kgN/ha because the N fertiliser inhibited biological N fixation (BNF). However, using a lower fertiliser rate (10 kg N/ha) for ID the estimate of pNatm obtained for chickpea in 1994 was 0·91, which was slightly higher than the IDres estimate. Proportional reliance on BNF was estimated to be greater in spring than at harvest for both lentil and chickpea. The estimates of p Natm obtained at harvest were greatest (>0·82) for both crops in 1994 and less, but similar, for both crops (0·64-0·79) in the other 2 seasons (1993 and 1995). Although substantial amounts of residual fertiliser N were present in the soil, only a small proportion of the original fertiliser N added (<5%) was utilised by plant uptake plus any losses in the residual year, indicative of a slow remineralisation rate for the immobilised labelled N. Nevertheless, the crops in the residual year were suciently enriched to allow for estimation of pNatm. The 15N abundance, at harvest, of wheat shoots from the 15N IDres method was similar to that of the soil nitrate and ammonium pools, suggesting that plant N uptake through the season had been from an N pool of reasonably constant enrichment. This was in contrast to wheat receiving 15N-labelled fertiliser at sowing, where the shoots at harvest had a higher 15N abundance than the plant-available N pool, indicating a declining15N enrichment of plant-available N in the soil through the season. Furthermore, variability in the 15N abundance of plant-available N with soil depth was also demonstrated to be greater where the 15N IDres method was used, for ammonium N at least. These differences in 15N enrichment patterns of the plant-available N pool for the 2 methods resulted in significantly different estimates for pNatm of lentil in 1994 but for all the other comparisons there were no major differences between estimates obtained using either ID or IDres.

1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM McNeill ◽  
CJ Pilbeam ◽  
HC Harris ◽  
RS Swift

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by legume crops was estimated in a Mediterranean environment at ICARDA in northern Syria for 3 consecutive seasons beginning in 1991-92. Using the classical isotope dilution technique (NID), estimates ranged from 32 to 82 kg N/ha for chickpea and from 18 to 82 kg N/ha for lentil. In comparison the simple N-difference method gave lower, sometimes negative, estimates for BNF by both crops in the latter 2 seasons but a higher estimate for chickpea in the first year. Discrepancies in the estimates from N-difference were correlated with differences in the amount of soil N taken up by the legume and the non-fixing wheat reference crop. Since soil N uptake by lentil in the first year was similar to wheat, the estimates of BNF from the 2 methods for that season were similar. The indirect effects of an interaction of added N fertiliser on N derived from the soil and thus on N uptake and estimated BNF are discussed in relation to the use of the isotope dilution method with A-value modification (NAV). Despite some significant differences in A-value for soils receiving different amounts of fertiliser it is demonstrated that the A-value method used in this study, with fertiliser rates of 10 kg N/ha to the legume and 30 kg N/ha to the non-legume, resulted in BNF estimates for lentil similar to those obtained using classical isotope dilution. However, this was not the case for chickpea where a direct inhibitory effect of fertiliser N at 30 kg N/ha resulted in lower estimates of BNF from NID than NAV. Since the reference crops derived as much as 90% of their N from the soil, it is recommended that future BNF studies using isotope dilution techniques for lentil and chickpea crops at ICARDA use a fertiliser rate lower than that used in this study. An isotope dilution method utilising a slow-release source of 15N or the natural abundance technique for estimating BNF are suggested as potentially useful alternatives. The need for a basic understanding of the soil N dynamics pertinent to each site as a prerequisite for choosing an appropriate method for estimating BNF is highlighted.


1963 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Van Der Straeten ◽  
A. Vermeulen ◽  
N. Orie ◽  
P. Regniers

ABSTRACT The authors studied the correlation between cortisol production, as measured by an isotope dilution method, and the urinary excretion of total and free Porter-Silber chromogens, as well as of 17-ketogenic steroids. Although a significant correlation exists between total Porter-Silber chromogens, 17-ketogenic steroid excretion and cortisol production, discrepancies are occasionally observed. Hence, different colorimetric methods should be used to assess the glucocorticoid activity of the adrenal cortex.


1996 ◽  
Vol 354 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 818-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Henkelmann ◽  
K. -W. Schramm ◽  
C. Klimm ◽  
A. Kettrup

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document