On the Microgenesis of Illusory Figures: A Failure to Replicate
Reynolds found in 1981 that with increased viewing time of a pattern which may or may not produce illusory contours there were: first, reports of the pattern without an illusory figure; then, at longer exposures, an increase in the frequency with which illusory figures were reported; and then, with still longer exposures, a decrease in such reports if the pattern contained elements which tended to contradict the possibility of such a figure. Unfortunately, however, three attempts to replicate these potentially very important findings—with the aid of substantially improved methodology—consistently failed to do so. It is suggested that this failure, although it is disappointing to those who subscribe to a ‘problem solving’ explanation of illusory contours, may not constitute a strong refutation of such a theory. Regardless, the purpose in the report is to clarify and rectify the published record concerning this part of the evidential underpinnings of that theory.