Head Movement Changes Apparent Depth Order in a Motion-Parallax Display

Perception ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keikichi Hayashibe

The hypothesis that the apparent visual depth is determined by the proximal velocity relative to the position of the head was examined in three experiments. Apparent protrusion/recession changed when subjects observed a moving random-dot pattern with their heads tilted sideways or rotated in the horizontal plane. This is ascribed to lateral head movement, which increases the proximal velocity when the dots and the subjects' heads are moving in opposite directions, and decreases the proximal velocity when both are moving in the same direction. Changes in the direction of movement of the stimulus caused a reversal of the apparent protrusion/recession. The resultant proximal velocity of the stimulus determined the order of depth of surfaces when the movement of the stimulus was linked to the subject's head movement.

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic393 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-393
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ishii ◽  
Masashi Fujita ◽  
Masayuki Sato

Perception ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1241-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ono ◽  
Hiroyasu Ujike

Coupling a motion aftereffect (MAE) produced by horizontal shearing motion with a lateral head movement yields apparent depth. In experiments 1 and 2, respectively, the magnitude and the decay time of this apparent depth were measured. In experiment 3, it was found that the stimulus that produced an MAE in experiments 1 and 2 failed to do so when it was viewed while the head moved leftward and rightward and depth was seen.


Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 937-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanao Yajima ◽  
Hiroyasu Ujike ◽  
Keiji Uchikawa

The two main questions addressed in this study were (a) what effect does yoking the relative expansion and contraction (EC) of retinal images to forward and backward head movements have on the resultant magnitude and stability of perceived depth, and (b) how does this relative EC image motion interact with the depth cues of motion parallax? Relative EC image motion was produced by moving a small CCD camera toward and away from the stimulus, two random-dot surfaces separated in depth, in synchrony with the observers' forward and backward head movements. Observers viewed the stimuli monocularly, on a helmet-mounted display, while moving their heads at various velocities, including zero velocity. The results showed that (a) the magnitude of perceived depth was smaller with smaller head velocities (<10 cm s−1), including the zero-head-velocity condition, than with a larger velocity (10 cm s−1), and (b) perceived depth, when motion parallax and the EC image motion cues were simultaneously presented, is equal to the greater of the two possible perceived depths produced from either of these two cues alone. The results suggested the role of nonvisual information of self-motion on perceiving depth.


1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 1424-1428
Author(s):  
William P. Janson ◽  
Gloria L. Calhoun

Past studies involving oculomotor responses have typically been limited to refixations along the horizontal plane, small sample sizes, and little data pertaining to head movement. The study reported herein addresses these data voids by collecting both eye and head latency data for refixations in the horizontal and vertical planes. The subjects' task was to perform a central manual tracking task while periodically responding to a verbal command to classify a target on one of four peripheral monitors. Two targets were displayed along the horizontal plane and two along the vertical plane. Results from 620 trials indicated similar trends for the eye and head latency across all four monitor locations, suggesting no significant differences in eye or head latency as a function of target plane.


Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Sakurai ◽  
H Ono

We investigated whether there is a trade-off between magnitude of perceived depth and that of perceived motion, using density changes (expansion/contraction) in a random-dot pattern yoked to lateral head movements. We simulated sine-wave surfaces with a depth of 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 cm. Subjects viewed the patterns monocularly while moving their heads from side to side laterally, and reported the magnitude of perceived depth and that of perceived motion. When simulated depth was less than 4 cm, the surfaces looked stationary and the amount of perceived depth was the same as that of simulated depth. When it was more than 4 cm, the surfaces appeared to move in a rocking motion and the amount of perceived depth was smaller than that of simulated depth. The trade-off implies a mechanism which transduces single visual input into depth or motion.


2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (15) ◽  
pp. 1969-1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Nawrot ◽  
Keith Stroyan

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (22) ◽  
pp. 2835-2843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Ujike ◽  
Hiroshi Ono

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-750
Author(s):  
Steven H. Ferris

The possible value of monocular motion parallax for improving distance perception underwater was investigated. Submerged Ss either kept their heads stationary or rotated their heads about a vertical axis while judging the distance of objects placed 4 to 15 ft. away. Both before and after training with feedback to increase accuracy of judgment, head movement did not significantly improve performance. Water turbidity and loss of position constancy are two probable reasons for the failure to replicate the positive results previously obtained in air.


Perception ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keikichi Hayashibe
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reuben Rideaux ◽  
William J Harrison

ABSTRACTDiscerning objects from their surrounds (i.e., figure-ground segmentation) in a way that guides adaptive behaviours is a fundamental task of the brain. Neurophysiological work has revealed a class of cells in the macaque visual cortex that may be ideally suited to support this neural computation: border-ownership cells (Zhou, Friedman, & von der Heydt, 2000). These orientation-tuned cells appear to respond conditionally to the borders of objects. A behavioural correlate supporting the existence of these cells in humans was demonstrated using two-dimensional luminance defined objects (von der Heydt, Macuda, & Qiu, 2005). However, objects in our natural visual environments are often signalled by complex cues, such as motion and depth order. Thus, for border-ownership systems to effectively support figure-ground segmentation and object depth ordering, they must have access to information from multiple depth cues with strict depth order selectivity. Here we measure in humans (of both sexes) border-ownership-dependent tilt aftereffects after adapting to figures defined by either motion parallax or binocular disparity. We find that both depth cues produce a tilt aftereffect that is selective for figure-ground depth order. Further, we find the effects of adaptation are transferable between cues, suggesting that these systems may combine depth cues to reduce uncertainty (Bülthoff & Mallot, 1988). These results suggest that border-ownership mechanisms have strict depth order selectivity and access to multiple depth cues that are jointly encoded, providing compelling psychophysical support for their role in figure-ground segmentation in natural visual environments.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSegmenting a visual object from its surrounds is a critical function that may be supported by “border-ownership” neural systems that conditionally respond to object borders. Psychophysical work indicates these systems are sensitive to objects defined by luminance contrast. To effectively support figure-ground segmentation, however, neural systems supporting border-ownership must have access to information from multiple depth cues and depth order selectivity. We measured border-ownership-dependent tilt aftereffects to figures defined by either motion parallax or binocular disparity and found aftereffects for both depth cues. These effects were transferable between cues, but selective for figure-ground depth order. Our results suggest that the neural systems supporting figure-ground segmentation have strict depth order selectivity and access to multiple depth cues that are jointly encoded.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document