On Interocular Transfer of the Movement Aftereffect in Individuals with and without Normal Binocular Vision

Perception ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J Wade
Keyword(s):  
Binocular Vision ◽  
Interocular Transfer ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
The Other ◽  
Reverse Direction ◽  
Movement Aftereffect ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Two Indices ◽  
Normal Binocular Vision

The duration of the movement aftereffect was measured in twenty-four normally binocular subjects and in eighteen subjects who lacked stereopsis as a consequence of childhood strabismus. Aftereffects were generated monocularly and binocularly, and compared to those which occurred after adaptation of one eye and testing with the other. Normal subjects were categorized on two indices of eye dominance, which involved sighting and rivalry tests. The monocular-aftereffect durations were slightly longer when the dominant eye was used, and interocular transfer from the dominant eye to the nondominant eye was greater than the transfer in the reverse direction; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The results from the strabismic subjects suggested that they fell into two distinct groups: one group (seven of the eighteen subjects) experienced no interocular transfer in either direction; the other group did yield some interocular transfer, and it was generally greater after adaptation of the dominant eye and testing the nondominant eye than in the reverse direction. Six of the seven subjects who failed to show any transfer still had misalignment of the visual axes, but this was not the case in any of the subjects exhibiting transfer.

Interocular Transfer in Normal Humans, and Those Who Lack Stereopsis

Perception ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Movshon ◽  
B E I Chambers ◽  
C Blakemore
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Interocular Transfer ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Stereoscopic Vision ◽  
Tilt Aftereffect ◽  
Developmental Effects ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
History Of ◽  
Normal Humans

Interocular transfer of the tilt aftereffect was investigated in normal humans with good stereopsis and in subjects without stereoscopic vision. These latter subjects were divided into two groups: those with and those without a history of strabismus. Strabismic subjects showed grossly reduced interocular transfer of the effect (12% mean transfer). Nonstrabismic subjects had moderate transfer (49%) and normal subjects showed approximately 70% mean transfer. All normal subjects showed greater transfer from the dominant eye to the nondominant than vice versa. The results are discussed with respect to developmental effects in the visual system of cats and humans, and the nature of the tilt aftereffect.

scholarly journals Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently

i-Perception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 204166951984139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. García-Pérez ◽  
Eli Peli
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Motion Perception ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Threshold Test ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Psychophysical Tests ◽  
Sensory Tests

Classical sighting or sensory tests are used in clinical practice to identify the dominant eye. Several psychophysical tests were recently proposed to quantify the magnitude of dominance but whether their results agree was never investigated. We addressed this question for the two most common psychophysical tests: The perceived-phase test, which measures the cyclopean appearance of dichoptically presented sinusoids of different phase, and the coherence-threshold test, which measures interocular differences in motion perception when signal and noise stimuli are presented dichoptically. We also checked for agreement with three classical tests (Worth 4-dot, Randot suppression, and Bagolini lenses). Psychophysical tests were administered in their conventional form and also using more dependable psychophysical methods. The results showed weak correlations between psychophysical measures of strength of dominance with inconsistent identification of the dominant eye across tests: Agreement on left-eye dominance, right-eye dominance, or nondominance by both tests occurred only for 11 of 40 observers (27.5%); the remaining 29 observers were classified differently by each test, including 14 cases (35%) of opposite classification (left-eye dominance by one test and right-eye dominance by the other). Classical tests also yielded conflicting results that did not agree well with classification based on psychophysical tests. The results are discussed in the context of determination of ocular dominance for clinical decisions.

scholarly journals The Dominant Eye: Dominant for Parvo- But Not for Magno-Biased Stimuli?

Vision ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Brian K. Foutch ◽  
Carl J. Bassi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Function ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Visual Direction ◽  
Rank Tests ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Contrast Thresholds ◽  
Parallel Visual Pathways

Eye dominance is often defined as a preference for the visual input of one eye to the other. Implicit in this definition is the dominant eye has better visual function. Several studies have investigated the effect of visual direction or defocus on ocular dominance, but there is less evidence connecting ocular dominance and monocular visual thresholds. We used the classic “hole in card” method to determine the dominant eye for 28 adult observers (11 males and 17 females). We then compared contrast thresholds between the dominant and non-dominant eyes using grating stimuli biased to be processed more strongly either by the magnocellular (MC) or parvocellular (PC) pathway. Using non-parametric mean rank tests, the dominant eye was more sensitive overall than the non-dominant eye to both stimuli (z = −2.54, p = 0.01). The dominant eye was also more sensitive to the PC-biased stimulus (z = −2.22, p = 0.03) but not the MC-biased stimulus (z = −1.16, p = 0.25). We discuss the clinical relevance of these results as well as the implications for parallel visual pathways.

scholarly journals Theta Burst Stimulation in Adults with Symmetric and Asymmetric Visual Acuity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Rita Tuna ◽  
Nuno Pinto Lc ◽  
Andresa Fernandes ◽  
Francisco Miguel Brardo ◽  
Maria Vaz Pato
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Binocular Vision ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Burst Stimulation ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Theta Burst ◽  
Normal Binocular Vision

Abstract Purpose: Theta Burst Stimulation can influence adult neuro-visual response in imbalanced visual pathways, possibly by influencing cortical excitability. Our objective was to compare suppressive imbalance (SI) and visual acuity (VA) after applying repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) between groups of subjects with normal binocular vision, visual asymmetry and amblyopia. Methods: Thirty – five volunteers between 19 and 51 years of age, were split into three groups: 6 volunteers with asymmetric VA (group A); 19 amblyopes (group B); and 10 subjects with normal binocular vision (group C). VA and SI of all groups were evaluated before and after a single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) or placebo stimulation over the right occipital cortex. Results: In both groups A and B we found a significant VA improvement in the non-dominant eye after cTBS (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively). In SI evaluation, group A and group B also revealed a significant improvement after the cTBS session (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively).Finally, in the group of volunteers with normal binocular vision and for placebo groups A and B, there were no significant differences in VA and SI after cTBS. Conclusions: Amblyopic and visually asymmetric individuals improved VA and SI of the non-dominant eye after cTBS when compared to baseline and to placebo stimulation. These enhancements were not found in the group of volunteers with normal binocular vision. We can therefore reasonably assume that cTBS may interfere with the visual system of subjects that present some kind of asymmetry, possibly by improving neuronal imbalances.

Determination of Factor XIII Activity and of Factor XIII Inhibitors Using an Ammonium-Sensitive Electrode

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 563-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Hellstern ◽  
K Schilz ◽  
G von Blohn ◽  
E Wenzel
Keyword(s):  
Factor Xiii ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
The Other ◽  
Activity Measurement ◽  
Factor Xiii Deficiency ◽  
Assay Procedure ◽  
Stabilization Factor ◽  
Release Method ◽  
Sensitive Electrode

SummaryAn assay for rapid factor XIII activity measurement has been developed based on the determination of the ammonium released during fibrin stabilization. Factor XIII was activated by thrombin and calcium. Ammonium was measured by an ammonium-sensitive electrode. It was demonstrated that the assay procedure yields accurate and precise results and that factor XIII-catalyzed fibrin stabilization can be measured kinetically. The amount of ammonium released during the first 90 min of fibrin stabilization was found to be 7.8 ± 0.5 moles per mole fibrinogen, which is in agreement with the findings of other authors. In 15 normal subjects and in 15 patients suffering from diseases with suspected factor XIII deficiency there was a satisfactory correlation between the results obtained by the “ammonium-release-method”, Bohn’s method, and the immunological assay (r1 = 0.65; r2= 0.70; p<0.01). In 3 of 5 patients with paraproteinemias the values of factor XIII activity determined by the ammonium-release method were markedly lower than those estimated by the other methods. It could be shown that inhibitor mechanisms were responsible for these discrepancies.

IMMUNOLOGICAL REACTIVITY OF INSULIN IN HUMAN SERUM

1966 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Deckert ◽  
Kai R. Jorgensen
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subjects ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Pancreas ◽  
Porcine Pancreas ◽  
Crystalline Insulin ◽  
Endogenous Insulin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Sera ◽  
Normal Human ◽  
The One

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a difference could be demonstrated between crystalline insulin extracted from normal human pancreas, and crystalline insulin extracted from bovine and porcine pancreas. Using Hales & Randle's (1963) immunoassay no immunological differences could be demonstrated between human and pig insulin. On the other hand, a significant difference was found, between pig and ox insulin. An attempt was also made to determine whether an immunological difference could be demonstrated between crystalline pig insulin and crystalline human insulin from non diabetic subjects on the one hand and endogenous, circulating insulin from normal subjects, obese subjects and diabetic subjects on the other. No such difference was found. From these experiments it is concluded that endogenous insulin in normal, obese and diabetic human sera is immunologically identical with human, crystalline insulin from non diabetic subjects and crystalline pig insulin.

scholarly journals Effect of corneal refractive surgery on accommodative and binocular dysfunctions among civilian pilots in Southwest China

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Wu ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Meng Liao ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Xue Lin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binocular Vision ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Visual Symptom ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Visual Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptom Scores ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery ◽  
Normal Binocular Vision

Abstract Background To analyze whether corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is associated with the distribution of different accommodative dysfunctions (ADs) and binocular dysfunctions (BDs) in civilian pilots. A further aim was to analyze the percentages and visual symptoms associated with ADs and/or BDs in this population. Methods One hundred and eight civilian pilots who underwent CRS from January 2001 to July 2012 (age: 30.33 ± 4.60 years) were enrolled, the mean preoperative SE was − 1.51 ± 1.15 D (range: − 1.00- − 5.00 D). Ninety-nine emmetropic civilian pilots (age: 29.64 ± 3.77 years) who were age- and sex-matched to the CRS group were also enrolled. Refractive status, accommodative and binocular tests of each subject were performed. Visually related symptoms were quantified using the 19-item College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life (COVD-QOL) questionnaire. The 19 items were summed to obtain visual symptom scores that might indicate visual dysfunctions. The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in percentages of ADs and/or BDs between the CRS and emmetropic groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare visual symptom scores between pilots with ADs and/or BDs and pilots with normal binocular vision. Results No significant difference was observed between the CRS and emmetropic groups in the overall prevalence of ADs and BDs (15.7% and 15.2% in the CRS and emmetropic groups, respectively; P = 0.185). ADs were present in 4.63% and 3.03% of the CRS and emmetropic group, respectively. BDs were observed in 11.1% and 12.1% of the CRS and emmetropic group, respectively, yielding no significant differences between the groups in the prevalence of ADs or BDs (AD: P = 0.094; BD: P = 0.105). Pilots with ADs and/or BDs had significantly more visual symptoms than pilots with normal binocular vision (p < 0.001). Conclusions CRS for civilian pilots with low-moderate myopia might not impact binocular functions. ADs and/or BDs commonly occur in both emmetropia pilots and pilots who undergo CRS, and pilots with ADs and/or BDs are associated with increased symptoms. This study confirms the importance of a full assessment of binocular visual functions in detecting and remedying these dysfunctions in this specific population.

scholarly journals Vagal feedback in the entrainment of respiration to mechanical ventilation in sleeping humans

2000 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 760-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy M. Simon ◽  
Alfred M. Habel ◽  
J. Andrew Daubenspeck ◽  
J. C. Leiter
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Lung Transplant ◽  
Respiratory Activity ◽  
Nrem Sleep ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
The Other ◽  
Absolute Requirement ◽  
Striking Contrast

We studied the capacity of four “normal” and six lung transplant subjects to entrain neural respiratory activity to mechanical ventilation. Two transplant subjects were studied during wakefulness and demonstrated entrainment indistinguishable from that of normal awake subjects. We studied four normal subjects and four lung transplant subjects during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Normal subjects entrained to mechanical ventilation over a range of ventilator frequencies that were within ±3–5 breaths of the spontaneous respiratory rate of each subject. After lung transplantation, during which the vagi were cut, subjects did demonstrate entrainment during NREM sleep; however, entrainment only occurred at ventilator frequencies at or above each subject's spontaneous respiratory rate, and entrainment was less effective. We conclude that there is no absolute requirement for vagal feedback to induce entrainment in subjects, which is in striking contrast to anesthetized animals in which vagotomy uniformly abolishes entrainment. On the other hand, vagal feedback clearly enhances the fidelity of entrainment and extends the range of mechanical frequencies over which entrainment can occur.

What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry?

Perception ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randolph Blake ◽  
David H Westendorf ◽  
Randall Overton
Keyword(s):  
Binocular Rivalry ◽  
The Other ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Prior Adaptation

To answer the question ‘What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?’ a series of three experiments was performed. In the first experiment observers viewed binocular rivalry between orthogonally oriented patterns. When the dominant and suppressed patterns were interchanged between the eyes observers continued seeing with the dominant eye, indicating that an eye, not a pattern, is suppressed during rivalry. In a second experiment it was found that a suppressed eye was able to contribute to stereopsis. A third experiment demonstrated that the predominance of an eye could be influenced by prior adaptation of the other eye, indicating that binocular mechanisms participate in the rivalry process.

Abstract 4023: Aspirin “Resistance”: Role of Pre-existent Platelet Reactivity and Correlation Between Tests

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L Frelinger ◽  
Youfu Li ◽  
Matthew D Linden ◽  
Inge Tarnow ◽  
Marc R Barnard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arachidonic Acid ◽  
Platelet Aggregation ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Aspirin Resistance ◽  
The Other ◽  
List Type ◽  
Platelet Function Test ◽  
Function Test

Background: Aspirin “resistance” (i.e. hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a platelet function test) has been widely reported, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. We examined the role of pre-existent platelet hyperreactivity in aspirin “resistance”. We also determined the correlation between aspirin resistance defined by serum thromboxane (TX) B 2 (the most specific test of aspirin’s effect) and other assays of platelet function. Methods: Platelet function measured before and after aspirin 81 mg daily for 7 days was analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation. Normal subjects (n=165) were studied because virtually all clinically relevant patients are already taking aspirin. An additional advantage of the use of normal subjects is that the platelet response to stimuli is not influenced (with resultant increased scatter of the data) by an underlying disease, e.g. coronary artery disease, which causes platelet hyperreactivity. Results: The proportion of the post-aspirin platelet function predicted by the pre-aspirin platelet function was 28.3 ± 7.5% (mean ± asymptotic standard error) for serum TXB 2 , 39.3 ± 6.8% for urinary 11-dehydro TXB 2 , 4.4 ± 7.7% for arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, 40.4 ± 7.1% for ADP-induced platelet aggregation, 26.3 ± 9.2% for the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay®, and 45.0 ± 10.9% for the TEG® PlateletMapping ™ System with arachidonic acid. Spearman rank order correlations were highly significant for comparisons between assays when both pre-aspirin and post-aspirin results were included in the analysis. However, residual serum TXB 2 levels post-aspirin treatment were not significantly associated with post-treatment results of any of the other assays. Platelet count correlated with pre-aspirin serum TXB 2 and VerifyNow Aspirin Assay, but not with any post-aspirin platelet function test. Conclusions: Aspirin “resistance” (i.e. hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a laboratory test) is in part unrelated to aspirin but is the result of underlying platelet hyperreactivity prior to the institution of aspirin therapy. Individuals identified as aspirin “resistant” defined by serum TXB 2 are not the same individuals identified by the other tests.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document