Implementation of conceptual problem solving (CPS) in the 5E learning cycle to improve students’ understanding of archimedes principle

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsania Nur Diyana ◽  
Dwi Haryoto ◽  
Sutopo
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Conceptual Problem

The analysis of students’ problem-solving ability in the 5E learning cycle with formative e-assessment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina Yuliana ◽  
Sentot Kusairi ◽  
Ahmad Taufiq ◽  
Rian Priyadi ◽  
Nur Diana Rosyidah
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Cycle

scholarly journals Student’s concept ability of Newton’s law based on verbal and visual test

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
N. D. Setyani ◽  
Cari Cari ◽  
Suparmi Suparmi ◽  
J. Handhika
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Physics Education ◽  
Visual Test ◽  
Conceptual Problem ◽  
Incorrect Answer ◽  
Newton's Law ◽  
Newton’S Law ◽  
Newton’S Laws

<p class="Abstract">Newton’s law is a foundamental concept that needs to be studied and understood correctly. Concept presentation in different representation will help the student to understand the concept that being learned. Student’s ability to present Newton’s law in different representation indicate the quality of student’s concept ability. This research aims to describe student’s concept ability of Newton’s laws based on the student’s ability of verbal and visual (pictorial and graphical) problem solving. The method of this research  is qualitative with the sample of 71 students of physics education from IKIP PGRI Madiun (14 students) and Sebelas Maret University (57 students). The instrument used in this research were conceptual test and  interview. The result showed that more student provide incorrect answer to the physics conceptual problem. Percentage of the incorrect answer for First Newton’s law problem is 69 %, Second Newton’s law problem is 71 %, and Third Newton’s law problem is 76 %. The  students do not understand the language of physics correctly, they undergo incorrect physics concept, and so they only understand few physics concept of Newton’s law.</p>

scholarly journals Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-432
Author(s):  
Puji Lestari ◽  
Rina Rosdiana
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Student Centered Learning ◽  
The Difference

AbstrakKemampuan pemecahan masalah merupakan bagian dari kurikulum pendidikan matematika saat ini. Fakta di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa masih belum optimal, salah satu penyebabnya adalah masih banyak siswa yang menemui kesulitan dalam hal pemahaman konsep dasar. Mengoptimalkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah diantaranya dapat ditempuh melalui pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa. Model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning merupakan dua dari beragam model pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan pencapaian kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis antara siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning. Hasil dari penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis antara siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning. Sementara itu, untuk kualitas peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning masing-masing berinterpretasi sedang namun skor perolehan nya berbeda. Secara umum, sikap siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning masing-masing berinterpretasi baik. Abstract (Students’ Problem Solving Ability through Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning)Currently mathematical problem solving ability was a part of mathematics curriculum. In fact, the mathematical problem solving ability of students was not optimized, one of the reasons is there are still many students who have problems in terms of understanding the basic concepts. To optimizing the mathematical problem solving ability of students, it, can be reached by implementing student-centered learning. Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning are two of a lot of student-centered learning models. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of achievement mathematical problem solving ability between students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models.  The results of this study are there is not a difference enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability between students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models. Meanwhile, the quality of enhancement mathematical problem solving ability students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models are in the middle interpretation. In general, students' attitudes toward learning mathematics using Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models each in good interpretation.

Learning cycles and focus groups

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Luz Tortorella ◽  
Samanta Viana ◽  
Diego Fettermann
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Knowledge Creation ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Information Collection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Complementary Method ◽  
Collection Data

Purpose – This study aims to propose a complementary method to the A3 information collection, data analysis and capturing and sharing knowledge to facilitate problem solving in a general framework. The incorporation of this method minimizes the difficulties identified in the literature focused on continuous improvement of processes. The method comprises combining triangulation techniques utilizing focus groups for a survey of qualitative data and the approach called Look – Ask – Model – Discuss – Act (LAMDA), which was originally designed for cycles of knowledge creation applied in product development processes. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology proposed in this work follows the A3 report approach including focus groups’ techniques in the planning step and problem analysis and the use of the LAMDA learning cycle, aiming to fill the gaps in A3 method. Therefore, the methodology includes five macro steps, which are divided into smaller steps. Note that the inclusion of the LAMDA learning cycle in the A3 report is called A3LAMDA. In addition, macro steps from 1 to 4 belong to “knowledge creation” step and macro step 5 deals with the “Capture of knowledge” step. Along the proposed methodology application, greater focus will be given to techniques incorporated in the A3 report, as they represent the main contribution of this method. Findings – The proposed approach to the A3 report was more concise and comprehensive, allowing different views and perspectives to be considered to understand the problem and find solutions through the focus groups method. In addition, the development of a structured questionnaire for the interviews encouraged the participants to present their opinions regarding the problem hypotheses. The use of the LAMDA learning cycle was essential to capture and share the knowledge acquired during the problem-solving process. It allowed not only the reflection on the aspects that have either worked or not but also the understanding of how to do the next work differently. Originality/value – This study aims to propose a complementary method to the A3 information collection, data analysis and capturing and sharing knowledge to facilitate problem solving in the general framework. The incorporation of this method minimizes the difficulties identified in the literature that focused on continuous improvement of processes.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Multirepresentasi dengan Pendekatan Conceptual Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kemampuan Representasi

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Leonardus Hendra Aha ◽  
Muhardjito Muhardjito ◽  
Sunaryono Sunaryono
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Representation Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conceptual Problem ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The purpose of this study is to look at the problem solving abilities and the representation abilities between students who learn with multi-presentation learning strategies with the conceptual problem solving approach and students who learn with conventional learning. Total sample is 68 students selected using the simple random sampling technique. This study used a quasi experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design. Data was collected using tests, both before treatment and after treatment. The results of the study were differences in problem solving abilities and representation abilities in both classes. In addition, problem solving abilities and representation abilities of students who learn with multi representation learning strategies with conceptual problem solving approaches are higher than students who learn with conventional learning.</p><strong>Abstrak:<em> </em></strong>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan representasi antara siswa yang belajar dengan strategi pembelajaran multirepresentasi dengan pendekatan <em>conceptual problem solving </em>dan siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 68 siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik <em>simple random sampling. </em>Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen kuasi. Desain dalam penelitian ini adalah <em>pretest-posttest control group design</em>. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes, baik sebelum perlakuan maupun setelah perlakuan. Hasil penelitian terdapat perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan representasi siswa yang belajar dengan strategi pembelajaran multirepresentasi dengan pendekatan <em>conceptual problem solving </em>dan siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Selain itu, kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan representasi siswa yang belajar dengan strategi pembelajaran multirepresentasi dengan pendekatan <em>conceptual problem solving </em>lebih tinggi dari siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Abdul Ma'arif ◽  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Cycle Model ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
8Th Grade ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Problem-solving skill is required by students and a target in studying mathematics. However, the problem-solving skill of Indonesian students are lacking. One effort that can be done is applying the Model of Learning Cycle 5E.  This research discussed the influence of the implementation of the learning cycle model on mathematics problem-solving skill viewed from students’ adversity quotient. This research used a quantitive approach, quasi-experimental study. The subjects were the 8th Grade students of SMP IT Ash-Shiddiiqi Jambi, consisting of two experiment classes and one control class. The instruments were post-test and adversity quotient questionnaire modified by Stoltz and had been validated by experts. Data analysis was conducted by Two-Way ANOVA. The results showed that there was no interaction between the learning cycle 5E model and mathematics problem-solving skill. This finding indicates that the model of learning cycle 5E affects problem-solving skills and can be applied to students with all types of adversity quotient.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN SCHOOLOGY DALAM MODEL BELAJAR LEARNING CYCLE 6 FASE-PROBLEM SOLVING (LC 6F-PS) TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEPTUAL DAN GRAFIK PADA MATERI LAJU REAKSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Reny Eka Evi Susanti ◽  
Srini M Iskandar
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Reaction Rate ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

ABSTRAKTujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan schoology dalam model belajar learning cycle 6F-problem solving terhadap pemahaman konseptual dan grafik siswa pada materi laju reaksi dan (2) mengetahui apakah ada hubungan antara pemahaman monseptual dengan pemahaman grafik siswa pada materi laju reaksi. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan penelitian eksperimental semu postest only design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Genteng. Sampel yang digunakan yaitu kelas XI MIPA 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XI MIPA 5 sebagai kelas kontrol. Pengujian hipotesis dianalisis menggunakan uji t dan uji korelasi dengan taraf signifikansi . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) ada perbedaan yang signifikan tingkat pemahaman konseptual dan grafik siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan aplikasi schoology dalam model belajar learning cycle 6F-problem solving dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model belajar learning cycle 6F-problem solving dan (2) tidak ada hubungan signifikan ntara tingkat pemahaman konseptual dengan pemahaman algoritmik siswa. ABSTRACTThe purposes of the research were (1) to find out the effect of schoology use in six phased learning cycle-problem solving toward the student’s conceptual and graphical understanding on the reaction rate, and (2) to find out the correlation between student’s conceptual undertanding with graphical understanding on the reaction rate. The design of the research was quasy experiment postest-only design. The population in this research was grade XI of Senior High School 1 Genteng. The sample which were chosen using cluster random sampling were XI MIPA 4 as an experimental class, XI MIPA 5 as the control class.The hypothesis testing was performed by t-test and correlation test using SPSS 16 for windows with a significance level  The result of the research showed that there were (1) significant differences of conceptual, algorithmic, and graphical understanding between students who learned using the applied schoology use in six phased learning cycle-problem solving and the students who learned using the six phased learning cycle-problem solving. (2) there was between student’s conceptual understanding with graphical undertanding.

MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH IPA MELALUI MODEL LEARNING CYCLE 7E PADA SISWA KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Aenahar
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Action Observation ◽  
Fourth Grade ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Action Monitoring ◽  
Astronomical Object ◽  
Field Notes ◽  
Science Problem

Abstract. This classroom action research’s objective is to improve science problem solving ability with Model of Learning Cycle (7E), about the change of earth’s surface and astronomical object on fourth grade students in State Elementary School. The subject of this research was 31 students at fourth grade of SDN Cipinang Melayu 01 Pagi Makasar, East Jakarta. This research used classroom action research method by employing Kemmis and Mc Taggart’s action design in which a cycle consists of four components such as planning, action, observation, and reflection. The data collection was done by using Non-Test instrument and field notes. The result of this research showed that the application of Model of Learning Cycle (7E) could be one of learning model to improve science problem solving ability at fourth grade of state elementary school. Based on the data from science problem solving ability in the first cycle, students which passed the test with score more than 70 is 70,9%.This percentage improved in the second cycle which became 87%. On the first cycle, teacher’s action monitoring data was 80% then it improved to be 100% in the second cycle. Students’ action monitoring in the first cycle was 73% and it improved to be 93% in the second cycle. The implication of this research was that the learning process with Model of Learning Cycle (7E) improve science problem solving ability on students at fourth grade of SDN Cipinang Melayu 01 Makasar, East Jakarta, to be better. Keywords: Science Problem Solving Ability, Learning Cycle (73), Elemantary School

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document