A duality consistent phase convention for complex conjugation in SUn

1983 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2542-2545 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Sullivan
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
DIEGO MARQUES ◽  
JOSIMAR RAMIREZ

In this paper, we shall prove that any subset of $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$, which is closed under complex conjugation, is the exceptional set of uncountably many transcendental entire functions with rational coefficients. This solves an old question proposed by Mahler [Lectures on Transcendental Numbers, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 546 (Springer, Berlin, 1976)].


2016 ◽  
Vol 152 (7) ◽  
pp. 1476-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Caraiani ◽  
Bao V. Le Hung

We compute the image of any choice of complex conjugation on the Galois representations associated to regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representations and to torsion classes in the cohomology of locally symmetric spaces for $\text{GL}_{n}$ over a totally real field $F$.


1995 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 1077-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Crabb ◽  
W. D. Munn

A construction is given for a trace function on the semigroup algebra of a certain type of E-unitary inverse semigroup over any subfield of the complex field that is closed under complex conjugation. In particular, the method applies to the semigroup algebras of free inverse semigroups of arbitrary rank.


2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Marker

When studying the model theory ofthe first observation is that the integers can be defined asSince ∂exp is subject to all of Gödel's phenomena, this is often also the last observation. After Wilkie proved that ℝexp is model complete, one could ask the same question for ∂exp, but the answer is negative.Proposition 1.1. ∂expis not model completeProof. If ∂exp is model complete, then every definable set is a projection of a closed set. Since ∂ is locally compact, every definable set is Fσ. The same is true for the complement, so every definable set is also Gδ. But, since ℤ is definable, ℚ is definable and a standard corollary of the Baire Category Theorem tells us that ℚ is not Gδ.Still, there are several interesting open questions about ∂exp.• Is ℝ definable in ∂exp?• (quasiminimality) Is every definable set countable or co-countable? (Note that this is true in the structure (∂, ℤ, +, ·) where we add a predicate for ℤ).• (Mycielski) Is there an automorphism of ∂exp other than the identity and complex conjugation?1A positive answer to the first question would tell us that ∂exp is essentially second order arithmetic, while a positive answer to the second would say that integers are really the only obstruction to a reasonable theory of definable sets.A fascinating, novel approach to ∂exp is provided by Zilber's [6] pseudoexponentiation. Let L be the language {+, · E, 0, 1}.


Pramana ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajaram Nityananda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document