Fluorescent light source with continuously tunable polarization via modification of molecular orientation

2013 ◽  
Vol 114 (8) ◽  
pp. 083508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk-Hwan Joo ◽  
Jang-Kyum Kim ◽  
Jang-Kun Song
1973 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. HEINRICHS

Alfalfa produced more herbage and more roots in a growth room when the fluorescent portion of an incandescent-fluorescent light source consisted of half gro-lux, high in blue-green-red light and half cool-white, high in blue-green-yellow-orange light than when it consisted of either alone. Protein content and degree of flowering were not affected by light source variations. Alfalfa cultivars, ranging in genetic makeup from Medicago falcata to M. media and M. sativa types, responded similarly to variations in light source. There was a definite trend for cultivars to produce less herbage and fewer roots as the proportion of M. falcata germ plasm in them increased. M. falcata flowered later than M. sativa in the growth room.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (15) ◽  
pp. 154205
Author(s):  
L Yue-Lan ◽  
Yin Xiang-Bao ◽  
Yang Yue ◽  
Liu Yong-Jun ◽  
Yuan Li-Bo

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-84
Author(s):  
Dean Kolbinson ◽  
Brendon Reynaud ◽  
Andrew Doig ◽  
Eric Tuttosi ◽  
Alan Heinrichs ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Köhl ◽  
Takayuki Tohge ◽  
Mark Aurel Schöttler

For precise phenotyping, Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. is grown under controlled conditions with fluorescent lamps as the predominant light source. Replacement by systems based on light emitting diodes (LED) could improve energy efficiency and stability of light quality and intensity. To determine whether this affects the reproducibility of results obtained under fluorescent lamps, four Arabidopsis accessions and a phytochrome mutant were grown and phenotyped under two different LED types or under fluorescent lamps. All genotypes had significantly higher rosette weight and seed mass and developed faster under LED light than under fluorescent lamps. However, differences between genotypes were reproducible independent of the light source. Chlorophyll content, photosynthetic complex accumulation and light response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were indistinguishable under LED and fluorescent light. Principal component analysis of leaf metabolite concentrations revealed that the effect of a change from fluorescent light to LED light was small compared with the diurnal effect, which explains 74% of the variance and the age effect during vegetative growth (12%). Altogether, the replacement of fluorescent lamps by LED allowed Arabidopsis cultivation and reproduction of results obtained under fluorescent light.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Nakamura ◽  
Hideki Asada ◽  
Toshiyuki Akiyama ◽  
Kenji Sera ◽  
Hiroshi Tanabe ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 28-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky Hohman

Fluorescence microscopy requires an intense light source at the specific wavelength that will excite fluorescent dyes and proteins. The traditional method employs a white light, typically from a Mercury or Xenon arc lamp. Although such broad-spectrum lamps can generate ample light at desired wavelengths, only a small percentage of the projected light is useful in any particular application. The other wavelengths need to be suppressed to avoid background noise that reduces image contrast and obscures the fluorescent light emissions.This process of suppressing extraneous light is complex, expensive, and only partially effective: even after decades of refinements, the best filters are not 100% percent successful at blocking the bleed through of non-specific photons. Some mitigation techniques end up not only suppressing peripheral light, but also significantly diminishing the intensity of the desired wavelengths. To address the root cause of the problem – the presence of non-specific photons – a radically different approach is coming to light.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document