Monte Carlo semi-empirical model for Si(Li) x-ray detector: Differences between nominal and fitted parameters

Author(s):  
N. López-Pino ◽  
F. Padilla-Cabal ◽  
J. A. García-Alvarez ◽  
L. Vázquez ◽  
K. D' Alessandro ◽  
...  
1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-251
Author(s):  
Sain D. Ahuja ◽  
Steven L. Stroup ◽  
Marion G. Bolin

1995 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 174-175
Author(s):  
U. Wessolowski ◽  
W.-R. Hamann ◽  
L. Koesterke ◽  
D. J. Hillier ◽  
J. Puls
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

Results from pointed ROSAT PSPC observations of nine single WN-type Wolf-Rayet stars are presented. Spectra of sufficient quality were obtained for two of them (WR1, WR110). The long exposure (35.5 ksec) X-ray spectrum of WR1 is more closely investigated with a semi-empirical model developed by Baum et al. (1992).


1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sain D. Ahuja ◽  
Steven L. Stroup ◽  
Marion G. Bolin

Author(s):  
J. L. Pouchou ◽  
J. F. Thiot

The procedures presently available for X-ray microanalysis (XRMA) of layered structures derive more or less directly from the semi-empirical ϕ(ρz) models proposed in the 80's. In the last years, the spreading of advanced computer programs such as Strata made more people aware than these methods were effective, and could be used in many cases as a complement or a substitute to near-surface analysis methods. New approaches for ϕ(ρz) reconstruction, based on the angular and energetic distributions of the electrons, are emerging (e.g. IntriX model). They should enable to describe more accurately structures with strong atomic number variations. Monte-Carlo simulations (M-C) are useful to assess ϕ(ρz) models, but for daily work their effectiveness seems presently restricted to the elaboration of calibration charts to be used for repetitive situations.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor V. Shchegolkov ◽  
Igor N. Sheino ◽  
Nikolai M. Borisov ◽  
Viktor V. Kalashnikov ◽  
Alexander A. Molin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bontempi ◽  
Lucia Andreani ◽  
Claudio Labanti ◽  
Paulo Roberto Costa ◽  
Pier Luca Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

Author(s):  
D. R. Liu ◽  
S. S. Shinozaki ◽  
R. J. Baird

The epitaxially grown (GaAs)Ge thin film has been arousing much interest because it is one of metastable alloys of III-V compound semiconductors with germanium and a possible candidate in optoelectronic applications. It is important to be able to accurately determine the composition of the film, particularly whether or not the GaAs component is in stoichiometry, but x-ray energy dispersive analysis (EDS) cannot meet this need. The thickness of the film is usually about 0.5-1.5 μm. If Kα peaks are used for quantification, the accelerating voltage must be more than 10 kV in order for these peaks to be excited. Under this voltage, the generation depth of x-ray photons approaches 1 μm, as evidenced by a Monte Carlo simulation and actual x-ray intensity measurement as discussed below. If a lower voltage is used to reduce the generation depth, their L peaks have to be used. But these L peaks actually are merged as one big hump simply because the atomic numbers of these three elements are relatively small and close together, and the EDS energy resolution is limited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document