Steady state performance test analysis of actively cooled extractor grids for SST-1 neutral beam injector

2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 113506 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Jana ◽  
S. K. Mattoo ◽  
M. Khan
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Neutral Beam ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Neutral Beam Injector ◽  
Steady State Performance

Steady-state operation of a large-area high-power RF ion source for the neutral beam injector

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 1273-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo-Hee Chang ◽  
Min Park ◽  
Seung Ho Jeong ◽  
Tae-Seong Kim ◽  
Kwang Won Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
High Power ◽  
Ion Source ◽  
Neutral Beam ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Neutral Beam Injector ◽  
Steady State Operation ◽  
Rf Ion Source

Neutral beam injector for steady state superconducting tokamak

1997 ◽  
pp. 657-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Chakraborty ◽  
N. Bisai ◽  
M.R. Jana ◽  
P.K. Jayakumar ◽  
U.K. Baruah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Neutral Beam ◽  
Neutral Beam Injector ◽  
Superconducting Tokamak

scholarly journals An Automation of Collector Testing and Modification of ANSI/ASHRAE 93-1986 Standard

1990 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Huang ◽  
S. W. Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Time Basis ◽  
Variable Weather ◽  
Small Scatter ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Steady State Performance

The steady-state performance test of solar collectors using ANSI/ASHRAE 93-1986 Standard was revised and an automation for the testing was carried out in the present study in order that the test can be easily performed outdoors in areas with variable weather conditions. It was shown that the 95 percent settling time of the collector τ95 can be adopted as the time basis in the selection of steady-state period for the test. To make the best use of the time available for the testing, the steady-state period defined by ANSI/ASHRAE 93-1986 Standard was changed to the τ95 plus five minutes, or ten minutes, whichever is larger. To reduce scatter uncertainty in the test results, the test period for the efficiency calculation was chosen as the segment of the last five minutes in the steady-state period and a steadiness condition defined statistically was adopted. To shorten the time for each test run a PC-based expert testing system, which is completely automatic and requires no operator, was developed in the present study. Using this expert system associated with the modified ANSI/ASHRAE 93-1986 Standard, we can effectively carry out the collector test at variable weather conditions with small scatter uncertainty and can substantially shorten the duration of a test.

Data acquisition and control system for steady state neutral beam injector

2001 ◽  
Vol 56-57 ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.B. Patel ◽  
V. Sharma ◽  
U.K. Baruah ◽  
P.J. Patel ◽  
P.K. Jayakumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Data Acquisition ◽  
Neutral Beam ◽  
Neutral Beam Injector ◽  
And Control

Engineering design of the steady state neutral beam injector for SST-1

2001 ◽  
Vol 56-57 ◽  
pp. 685-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K Mattoo ◽  
A.K Chakraborty ◽  
U.K Baruah ◽  
P.K Jayakumar ◽  
M Bandyopadhyay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Neutral Beam ◽  
Neutral Beam Injector

Thermal Performance Testing of Solar Steam Generator 4 at AREVA Solar’s Kimberlina Demonstration Facility

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Jane Hale ◽  
Peter Sugimura ◽  
Rob Hanson ◽  
Milt Venetos ◽  
Peter Tanner
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Testing Methodology ◽  
Independent Expert ◽  
Uncertainty Calculation ◽  
Steady State Performance

The Kimberlina Solar Thermal Power Station in Bakersfield, California, is AREVA Solar’s first North American solar thermal energy facility and an important showcase of AREVA’s Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector (CLFR) technology. Construction of a fourth solar steam generator (SSG4) was completed at Kimberlina in August 2010. At the time SSG4 represented AREVA Solar’s most current commercial technology, designed for direct superheat steam generation. SSG4 incorporates technology advancements that significantly enhance the AREVA Solar technology’s controllability, steam temperature and pressure capabilities as well as overall performance. After SSG4 was commissioned, AREVA Solar carried out an extensive performance test program on this advanced technology to formally evaluate and quantify its measured performance and compare that to the model-predicted performance. The performance testing included two specific tests. The first was the Steady State Performance Test (SSPT), which evaluated the technology’s steady-state performance over a two-hour period on multiple days. The second test was the Entire Day Performance Test (EDPT), which evaluated the technology’s performance throughout an entire day, including overnight losses, startup, mid-day performance (including steady-state, quasi steady-state and transients) and shutdown. The third test demonstrated the technology’s response to a simulated direct normal insolation (DNI) transient. AREVA Solar took great care to design and perform this testing in a standardized manner that would stand up to independent, expert observation and was consistent with established ASME performance test codes (PTC), where applicable. AREVA Solar plans to implement this testing methodology in future commercial plants and technology demonstrations. This paper documents in detail the performance testing methodology used to evaluate AREVA Solar’s new technology, including: • Test prerequisites; • Performance (both measured and modeled) calculation equations; • Environmental and optical surface measurement techniques; • Measurement test success criteria; • Uncertainty calculation and implementation. This paper also documents the measured testing results relative to the AREVA Solar internal modeled results including follow-up model validation.

Quasi-steady-state performance of a heat pipe subjected to transient acceleration loadings

10.2514/3.895 ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin H. Olmstead ◽  
Edward S. Taylor ◽  
Meng Wang ◽  
Parviz Moin ◽  
Scott K. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Heat Pipe ◽  
Quasi Steady State ◽  
Steady State Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document