Series array of incommensurate superconducting quantum interference devices from YBa2Cu3O7−δ ion damage Josephson junctions

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (18) ◽  
pp. 182502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane A. Cybart ◽  
S. M. Wu ◽  
S. M. Anton ◽  
I. Siddiqi ◽  
John Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Josephson Junctions ◽  
Quantum Interference ◽  
Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices ◽  
Superconducting Quantum Interference ◽  
Ion Damage

NanoSQUIDs Applied to the Investigation of Small Magnetic Systems

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Martínez-Pérez ◽  
R. Kleiner ◽  
D. Koelle
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Josephson Junctions ◽  
Quantum Interference ◽  
Magnetic Systems ◽  
Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices ◽  
Stray Magnetic Field ◽  
Phase Dynamics ◽  
Superconducting Quantum Interference ◽  
Practical Constraints

This article discusses the use of nanoSQUIDs for investigating small magnetic systems. It begins with an overview of the basics of superconducting quantum interference devices, focusing on how a dc SQUID operates and the use of resistively and capacitively shunted junction model to describe the phase dynamics of Josephson junctions (JJs). It then considers the motivation for using nanoSQUIDs, along with the importance of their size and geometry. It also evaluates micro- and nanoSQUIDs made of various types of JJs including nanoSQUIDs based on sandwich-like junctions, constriction-like junctions, and proximized structures. After reviewing different nanoSQUID readout methods that can be used to directly sense the stray magnetic field created by a nanoscale magnetic sample, the article concludes by highlighting some of the practical constraints and challenges encountered in using nanoSQUID technology, including particle positioning with respect to the sensor’s surface.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document