Gain properties of an Er3+ complex in a poly(methylmethacrylate) matrix for 1540nm broadband optical amplification

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 023110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Quoc Le Quang ◽  
V. G. Truong ◽  
A.-M. Jurdyc ◽  
B. Jacquier ◽  
J. Zyss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Amplification

Er 3+ ‐doped antimony‐silica glass and fiber for broadband optical amplification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weida Zhang ◽  
Liting Lin ◽  
Bijiao Lan ◽  
Jiantao Liu ◽  
Yun Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Silica Glass ◽  
Optical Amplification

Optical amplification for measuring minute displacement of laser beam

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yunsheng Bi ◽  
Pengfei Zhu ◽  
Xuemei Li ◽  
Kun Zhu ◽  
Yunxia Ping ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Beam ◽  
Optical Amplification

Optical amplification and electroluminescence at 1.54 μm in Er-doped zinc silicate germanate on silicon

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 1462-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. Baker ◽  
J. Heikenfeld ◽  
Z. Yu ◽  
A. J. Steckl
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Silicate ◽  
Optical Amplification ◽  
Er Doped

Optical amplification in a multichannel FSK coherent system

1988 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Glance ◽  
G. Eisenstein ◽  
P.J. Fitzgerald ◽  
K.J. Pollock ◽  
G. Raybon
Keyword(s):  
Coherent System ◽  
Optical Amplification

Optical amplification in 45° cut BaTi0 3

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven K. Rogers ◽  
Kenneth S. Keppler ◽  
George A. Vogel ◽  
Matthew Kabrisky ◽  
James P. Mills
Keyword(s):  
Optical Amplification

Observation of Optical Amplification Excited by Traveling Electron Beam

2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 7109-7110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Kuwamura ◽  
Minoru Yamada ◽  
Yukihiro Ichino ◽  
Isao Fukamura ◽  
Toshihisa Sekikawa
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Optical Amplification

scholarly journals Effect of 405 nm Diode Laser with Varying Irradiation Time on BHK-21 Fibroblast Viability

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Kun Ismiyatin ◽  
Leidy Herlin Rumbiak ◽  
Widya Saraswati ◽  
Sri Kunarti ◽  
Anuj Bhardwaj
Keyword(s):  
Laser Diode ◽  
Irradiation Time ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Stimulated Emission ◽  
Fibroblast Cells ◽  
Optical Amplification ◽  
Viability Test ◽  
Inhibition Response ◽  
Levene Test ◽  
Radiation Time

Background: Laser is a device that emits light through a process of optical amplification based on the stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation; it can be used for surgery, detoxification, bio stimulation and antibacterial. However, lasers have Biphasic Dose Response (BDR), which is bio stimulation and bio inhibition. To determine if 405 nm laser diode is biocompatible, viability test is necessary before these lasers can be labeled as viable to use in dental therapy. Aim: To prove the variation of radiation time of the 405 nm laser diode radiation can cause bio stimulation and bio inhibition response that affects the viability of BHK-21 fibroblast cells. Method: Viability test was carried out using BHK-21 fibroblast cells which were inserted into 96-well microplate, then radiated with 405 nm laser diode with varying irradiation time of 30s, 60s, 120s, 240s and 480s. After radiation, the cells are then incubated for 24h. Cytotoxicity was observed using MTT assay and ELISA reader. Data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene Test, Welch ANOVA, and Tukey HSD. Results: BHK-21 fibroblast cells radiated with 405 nm laser diode with radiation time of 30s, 60s, 120s, and 240s have the same viability as the control cell, while at 480 seconds the viability exceeds that of the control cell. Conclusion: 405 nm laser diode with radiation times of 30s, 60s, 120s, and 240s do not affect the viability of BHK-21 fibroblast cells. Meanwhile, 480s irradiation time of 405 nm laser diode causes bio stimulation response that increases the viability of BHK-21 fibroblast cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document