Effects of surface roughness and freestream turbulence on the wake turbulence structure of a symmetric airfoil

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2044-2053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Sang Woo Lee ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Wake Turbulence

scholarly journals Wake Turbulence Structure Downstream of a Cambered Airfoil in Transonic Flow: Effects of Surface Roughness and Freestream Turbulence Intensity

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Vortex Shedding ◽  
Transonic Flow ◽  
Streamwise Velocity ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Wake Turbulence ◽  
Vortex Shedding Frequency ◽  
Flow Effects

The wake turbulence structure of a cambered airfoil is studied experimentally, including the effects of surface roughness, at different freestream turbulence levels in a transonic flow. As the level of surface roughness increases, all wake profile quantities broaden significantly and nondimensional vortex shedding frequencies decrease. Freestream turbulence has little effect on the wake velocity profiles, turbulence structure, and vortex shedding frequency, especially downstream of airfoils with rough surfaces. Compared with data from a symmetric airfoil, wake profiles produced by the cambered airfoils also have significant dependence on surface roughness, but are less sensitive to variations of freestream turbulence intensity. The cambered airfoil also produces larger streamwise velocity deficits, and broader wakes compared to the symmetric airfoil.

scholarly journals Effects of Surface Roughness, Freestream Turbulence, and Incidence Angle on the Performance of a 2-D Compressor Cascade

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Elrod ◽  
P. I. King ◽  
E. M. Poniatowski
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Incidence Angle ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Compressor Cascade ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Linear Cascade ◽  
Pressure Loss Coefficient ◽  
Total Pressure Loss Coefficient

The effects of surface roughness, freestream turbulence, and incidence angle on the performance of a two-dimensional compressor cascade were investigated. The test section consisted of seven NACA 65-A506 airfoils arranged in a linear cascade. Four different surface roughness conditions were applied to the first 25 percent chord on the suction surface of each of the five middle blades in the cascade. Freestream turbulence levels of approximately one and seven percent were used. Incidence angles of −3, zero and +3 degrees were investigated. Of the three parameters tested, freestream turbulence exerted the largest influence on blade performance. The total pressure loss coefficient increased with increased roughness and was reduced for large turbulence. Changes in flow incidence had a lesser effect on the performance of the blade.

Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries

1971 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Grass
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Quantitative Description ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
The Body ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Turbulence Production ◽  
Conditional Averaging

An experimental study of boundary-layer turbulence in a free surface channel flow is described. Attention is concentrated on the effects of different surface roughness conditions on the turbulence structure in the boundary region. Hydrogen bubble flow tracers and medium high-speed motion photography were used to obtain an instantaneous visual and quantitative description of the flow field. In particular it proved possible to record instantaneous longitudinal and vertical velocity profiles from which distributions of the instantaneous Reynolds stress contribution were computed.Two well-defined intermittent features of the flow structure were visually identified close to the boundary. These consisted of fluid ejection phases, previously reported by Kline et al. (1967) for smooth boundary flow, and fluid inrush phases. Conditional averaging of the instantaneous velocity data yielded quantitative confirmation that ejection phases corresponded with ejection of low momentum fluid outwards from the boundary whilst inrush phases were associated with the transport of high momentum fluid inwards towards the boundary. Inrush and ejection events were present irrespective of the surface roughness condition.Conditional averaging also indicated that both inrush and ejection sequences correlate with an extremely high contribution to Reynolds stress and hence turbulence production close to the boundary. Indeed the present results, taken with those from previous studies, suggest that turbulence production is dominated by the joint contribution from the inrush and ejection events. It is emphasized that these structural features are intermittent, forming important linked elements of a randomly repeating cycle of wall-region turbulence production which is apparently driven by some violent three-dimensional instability mechanism.Whilst the most coherent effects of the observed inrush phases appear to be mainly confined to a region close to the boundary, the influence of the ejection phases is far more extensive. The ejected low momentum fluid elements, drawn from the viscous sublayer and from between the interstices of the roughness elements, travel outwards from the boundary into the body of the flow and give rise to very large positive contributions to Reynolds stress at points remote from the boundary. This effect is sufficiently strong to prompt the suggestion that the ejection process could represent a universal and dominant mode of momentum transport outside the immediate wall region and possibly extending across the entire thickness of the boundary layer.A structural model based on the present observations is seen to exhibit consistency with many commonly visualized features and recorded average properties of turbulent boundary-layer flows in general.

The effect of surface roughness on the turbulence structure of a plane wall jet

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 085103 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rostamy ◽  
D. J. Bergstrom ◽  
D. Sumner ◽  
J. D. Bugg
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Plane Wall ◽  
Wall Jet ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Roughness Effects on the Mixing Properties in Open Channel Turbulent Boundary Layers

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark F. Tachie ◽  
Donald J. Bergstrom ◽  
Ram Balachandar
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Open Channel ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Mixing Properties ◽  
Roughness Elements ◽  
Specific Geometry ◽  
Transport And Mixing

This paper investigates the effects of surface roughness on the transport and mixing properties in turbulent boundary layers created in an open channel. The measurements were obtained on a smooth and two different types of rough surfaces using a laser Doppler anemometer. The results show that surface roughness enhances the levels of the turbulence kinetic energy, turbulence production, and diffusion over most of the boundary layer. The distributions of the eddy viscosity and mixing length are also strongly modified by surface roughness. Furthermore, the extent to which surface roughness modifies the turbulence structure depends on the specific geometry of the roughness elements.

A Critical Assessment of Reynolds Analogy for Turbine Flows

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bons
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Pressure Drag

The application of Reynolds analogy 2St/cf≅1 for turbine flows is critically evaluated using experimental data collected in a low-speed wind tunnel. Independent measurements of St and cf over a wide variety of test conditions permit assessments of the variation of the Reynolds analogy factor (i.e., 2St/cf) with Reynolds number, freestream pressure gradient, surface roughness, and freestream turbulence. While the factor is fairly independent of Reynolds number, it increases with positive (adverse) pressure gradient and decreases with negative (favorable) pressure gradient. This variation can be traced directly to the governing equations for momentum and energy which dictate a more direct influence of pressure gradient on wall shear than on energy (heat) transfer. Surface roughness introduces a large pressure drag component to the net skin friction measurement without a corresponding mechanism for a comparable increase in heat transfer. Accordingly, the Reynolds analogy factor decreases dramatically with surface roughness (by as much as 50% as roughness elements become more prominent). Freestream turbulence has the opposite effect of increasing heat transfer more than skin friction, thus the Reynolds analogy factor increases with turbulence level (by up to 35% at a level of 11% freestream turbulence). Physical mechanisms responsible for the observed variations are offered in each case. Finally, synergies resulting from the combinations of pressure gradient and freestream turbulence with surface roughness are evaluated. With this added insight, the Reynolds analogy remains a useful tool for qualitative assessments of complex turbine flows where both heat load management and aerodynamic efficiency are critical design parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document