Solving mixed-integer robust optimization problems with interval uncertainty using Benders decomposition

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sauleh Siddiqui ◽  
Steven A Gabriel ◽  
Shapour Azarm
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Benders Decomposition ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Interval Uncertainty ◽  
Mixed Integer

Sequential Quadratic Programming for Robust Optimization With Interval Uncertainty

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhua Zhou ◽  
Shuo Cheng ◽  
Mian Li
Keyword(s):  
Quadratic Programming ◽  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Sequential Quadratic Programming ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Interval Uncertainty ◽  
Design Solution ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Feasibility Robustness

Uncertainty plays a critical role in engineering design as even a small amount of uncertainty could make an optimal design solution infeasible. The goal of robust optimization is to find a solution that is both optimal and insensitive to uncertainty that may exist in parameters and design variables. In this paper, a novel approach, sequential quadratic programming for robust optimization (SQP-RO), is proposed to solve single-objective continuous nonlinear optimization problems with interval uncertainty in parameters and design variables. This new SQP-RO is developed based on a classic SQP procedure with additional calculations for constraints on objective robustness, feasibility robustness, or both. The obtained solution is locally optimal and robust. Eight numerical and engineering examples with different levels of complexity are utilized to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed SQP-RO with the comparison to its deterministic SQP counterpart and RO approaches using genetic algorithms. The objective and/or feasibility robustness are verified via Monte Carlo simulations.

scholarly journals K-adaptability in two-stage mixed-integer robust optimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh Subramanyam ◽  
Chrysanthos E. Gounaris ◽  
Wolfram Wiesemann
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Finite Convergence ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Benchmark Data ◽  
Finite Dimensional Approximation ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Approximation

Abstract We study two-stage robust optimization problems with mixed discrete-continuous decisions in both stages. Despite their broad range of applications, these problems pose two fundamental challenges: (i) they constitute infinite-dimensional problems that require a finite-dimensional approximation, and (ii) the presence of discrete recourse decisions typically prohibits duality-based solution schemes. We address the first challenge by studying a K-adaptability formulation that selects K candidate recourse policies before observing the realization of the uncertain parameters and that implements the best of these policies after the realization is known. We address the second challenge through a branch-and-bound scheme that enjoys asymptotic convergence in general and finite convergence under specific conditions. We illustrate the performance of our algorithm in numerical experiments involving benchmark data from several application domains.

The Value of Randomized Solutions in Mixed-Integer Distributionally Robust Optimization Problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Delage ◽  
Ahmed Saif
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Facility Location ◽  
Column Generation ◽  
Location Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Facility Location Problem ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Distributionally Robust Optimization ◽  
Continuous Relaxation ◽  
Distributionally Robust

Randomized decision making refers to the process of making decisions randomly according to the outcome of an independent randomization device, such as a dice roll or a coin flip. The concept is unconventional, and somehow counterintuitive, in the domain of mathematical programming, in which deterministic decisions are usually sought even when the problem parameters are uncertain. However, it has recently been shown that using a randomized, rather than a deterministic, strategy in nonconvex distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems can lead to improvements in their objective values. It is still unknown, though, what is the magnitude of improvement that can be attained through randomization or how to numerically find the optimal randomized strategy. In this paper, we study the value of randomization in mixed-integer DRO problems and show that it is bounded by the improvement achievable through its continuous relaxation. Furthermore, we identify conditions under which the bound is tight. We then develop algorithmic procedures, based on column generation, for solving both single- and two-stage linear DRO problems with randomization that can be used with both moment-based and Wasserstein ambiguity sets. Finally, we apply the proposed algorithm to solve three classical discrete DRO problems: the assignment problem, the uncapacitated facility location problem, and the capacitated facility location problem and report numerical results that show the quality of our bounds, the computational efficiency of the proposed solution method, and the magnitude of performance improvement achieved by randomized decisions. Summary of Contribution: In this paper, we present both theoretical results and algorithmic tools to identify optimal randomized strategies for discrete distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems and evaluate the performance improvements that can be achieved when using them rather than classical deterministic strategies. On the theory side, we provide improvement bounds based on continuous relaxation and identify the conditions under which these bound are tight. On the algorithmic side, we propose a finitely convergent, two-layer, column-generation algorithm that iterates between identifying feasible solutions and finding extreme realizations of the uncertain parameter. The proposed algorithm was implemented to solve distributionally robust stochastic versions of three classical optimization problems and extensive numerical results are reported. The paper extends a previous, purely theoretical work of the first author on the idea of randomized strategies in nonconvex DRO problems by providing useful bounds and algorithms to solve this kind of problems.

Radius of Robust Feasibility for Mixed-Integer Problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frauke Liers ◽  
Lars Schewe ◽  
Johannes Thürauf
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Continuous Optimization ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Lp Relaxation ◽  
Maximal Size ◽  
Uncertainty Sets ◽  
Uncertainty Set ◽  
New Methodologies ◽  
Continuous Optimization Problems

For a mixed-integer linear problem (MIP) with uncertain constraints, the radius of robust feasibility (RRF) determines a value for the maximal size of the uncertainty set such that robust feasibility of the MIP can be guaranteed. The approaches for the RRF in the literature are restricted to continuous optimization problems. We first analyze relations between the RRF of a MIP and its continuous linear (LP) relaxation. In particular, we derive conditions under which a MIP and its LP relaxation have the same RRF. Afterward, we extend the notion of the RRF such that it can be applied to a large variety of optimization problems and uncertainty sets. In contrast to the setting commonly used in the literature, we consider for every constraint a potentially different uncertainty set that is not necessarily full-dimensional. Thus, we generalize the RRF to MIPs and to include safe variables and constraints; that is, where uncertainties do not affect certain variables or constraints. In the extended setting, we again analyze relations between the RRF for a MIP and its LP relaxation. Afterward, we present methods for computing the RRF of LPs and of MIPs with safe variables and constraints. Finally, we show that the new methodologies can be successfully applied to the instances in the MIPLIB 2017 for computing the RRF. Summary of Contribution: Robust optimization is an important field of operations research due to its capability of protecting optimization problems from data uncertainties that are usually defined via so-called uncertainty sets. Intensive research has been conducted in developing algorithmically tractable reformulations of the usually semi-infinite robust optimization problems. However, in applications it also important to construct appropriate uncertainty sets (i.e., prohibiting too conservative, intractable, or even infeasible robust optimization problems due to the choice of the uncertainty set). In doing so, it is useful to know the maximal “size” of a given uncertainty set such that a robust feasible solution still exists. In this paper, we study one notion of “size”: the radius of robust feasibility (RRF). We contribute on the theoretical side by generalizing the RRF to MIPs as well as to include “safe” variables and constraints (i.e., where uncertainties do not affect certain variables or constraints). This allows to apply the RRF to many applications since safe variables and constraints exist in most applications. We also provide first methods for computing the RRF of LPs as well as of MIPs with safe variables and constraints. Finally, we show that the new methodologies can be successfully applied to the instances in the MIPLIB 2017 for computing the RRF.

Modeling Defender-Attacker Problems as Robust Linear Programs with Mixed-Integer Uncertainty Sets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan S. Borrero ◽  
Leonardo Lozano
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Convex Sets ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computational Study ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Point Problem ◽  
Solution Algorithms ◽  
Uncertainty Sets ◽  
Uncertainty Set

We study a class of sequential defender-attacker optimization problems where the defender’s objective is uncertain and depends on the operations of the attacker, which are represented by a mixed-integer uncertainty set. The defender seeks to hedge against the worst possible data realization, resulting in a robust optimization problem with a mixed-integer uncertainty set, which requires the solution of a challenging mixed-integer problem, which can be seen as a saddle-point problem over a nonconvex domain. We study two exact solution algorithms and present two feature applications for which the uncertainty is naturally modeled as a mixed-integer set. Our computational experiments show that the considered algorithms greatly outperform standard algorithms both in terms of computational time and solution quality. Moreover, our results show that modeling uncertainty with mixed-integer sets, instead of approximating the data using convex sets, results in less conservative solutions, which translates to a lower cost for the defender to protect from uncertainty. Summary of Contribution: We consider a class of defender-attacker problems where the defender has to make operational decisions that depend on uncertain actions from an adversarial attacker. Due to the type of information available to the defender, neither probabilistic modeling, nor robust optimization methods with convex uncertainty sets, are well suited to address the defender’s decision-making problem. Consequently, we frame the defender’s problem as a class of robust optimization problems with a mixed-integer uncertainty sets, and devise two exact algorithms that solve this class of problems. A comprehensive computational study shows that for the considered applications, our algorithms improves the performance of existing robust optimization approaches that can be adapted to solve this class of problems. Moreover, we show how mixed-integer uncertainty sets can reduce the level of over-conservatism that is a known issue of robust optimization approaches.

scholarly journals Distributionally Robust Model of Energy and Reserve Dispatch Based on Kullback–Leibler Divergence

Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ce Yang ◽  
Dong Han ◽  
Weiqing Sun ◽  
Kunpeng Tian
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Benders Decomposition ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Kl Divergence ◽  
Leibler Divergence ◽  
Expected Total Cost ◽  
Distributionally Robust ◽  
Bus System

This paper proposes a distance-based distributionally robust energy and reserve (DB-DRER) dispatch model via Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence, considering the volatile of renewable energy generation. Firstly, a two-stage optimization model is formulated to minimize the expected total cost of energy and reserve (ER) dispatch. Then, KL divergence is adopted to establish the ambiguity set. Distinguished from conventional robust optimization methodology, the volatile output of renewable power generation is assumed to follow the unknown probability distribution that is restricted in the ambiguity set. DB-DRER aims at minimizing the expected total cost in the worst-case probability distributions of renewables. Combining with the designed empirical distribution function, the proposed DB-DRER model can be reformulated into a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem. Furthermore, using the generalized Benders decomposition, a decomposition method is proposed and sample average approximation (SAA) method is applied to solve this problem. Finally, simulation result of the proposed method is compared with those of stochastic optimization and conventional robust optimization methods on the 6-bus system and IEEE 118-bus system, which demonstrates the effectiveness and advantages of the method proposed.

A New Hybrid Algorithm for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization With Interval Uncertainty

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Cheng ◽  
Jianhua Zhou ◽  
Mian Li
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Interval Uncertainty ◽  
Engineering Optimization ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Robust Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
And Performance

Uncertainty is a very critical but inevitable issue in design optimization. Compared to single-objective optimization problems, the situation becomes more difficult for multi-objective engineering optimization problems under uncertainty. Multi-objective robust optimization (MORO) approaches have been developed to find Pareto robust solutions. While the literature reports on many techniques in MORO, few papers focus on using multi-objective differential evolution (MODE) for robust optimization (RO) and performance improvement of its solutions. In this article, MODE is first modified and developed for RO problems with interval uncertainty, formulating a new MODE-RO algorithm. To improve the solutions’ quality of MODE-RO, a new hybrid (MODE-sequential quadratic programming (SQP)-RO) algorithm is proposed further, where SQP is incorporated into the procedure to enhance the local search. The proposed hybrid approach takes the advantage of MODE for its capability of handling not-well behaved robust constraint functions and SQP for its fast local convergence. Two numerical and one engineering examples, with two or three objective functions, are tested to demonstrate the applicability and performance of the proposed algorithms. The results show that MODE-RO is effective in solving MORO problems while, on the average, MODE-SQP-RO improves the quality of robust solutions obtained by MODE-RO with comparable numbers of function evaluations.

scholarly journals Generalized Benders Decomposition Method to Solve Big Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization Problems with Convex Objective and Constraints Functions

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (20) ◽  
pp. 6503
Author(s):  
Andrzej Karbowski
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Optimization ◽  
Benders Decomposition ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Master Problem ◽  
Computational Algorithms ◽  
Generalized Benders Decomposition ◽  
Representation Theorems ◽  
Mixed Integer Nonlinear Optimization ◽  
Basic Approaches

The paper presents the Generalized Benders Decomposition (GBD) method, which is now one of the basic approaches to solve big mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problems. It concentrates on the basic formulation with convex objectives and constraints functions. Apart from the classical projection and representation theorems, a unified formulation of the master problem with nonlinear and linear cuts will be given. For the latter case the most effective and, at the same time, easy to implement computational algorithms will be pointed out.

A multi-objective robust optimization approach for engineering design under interval uncertainty

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 580-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Xinyu Shao ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Tingli Xie ◽  
Jiexiang Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Interval Uncertainty ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Computational Burden ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Design Alternatives ◽  
Kriging Metamodel

Purpose Engineering system design and optimization problems are usually multi-objective and constrained and have uncertainties in the inputs. These uncertainties might significantly degrade the overall performance of engineering systems and change the feasibility of the obtained solutions. This paper aims to propose a multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Kriging metamodel (K-MORO) to obtain the robust Pareto set under the interval uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach In K-MORO, the nested optimization structure is reduced into a single loop optimization structure to ease the computational burden. Considering the interpolation uncertainty from the Kriging metamodel may affect the robustness of the Pareto optima, an objective switching and sequential updating strategy is introduced in K-MORO to determine (1) whether the robust analysis or the Kriging metamodel should be used to evaluate the robustness of design alternatives, and (2) which design alternatives are selected to improve the prediction accuracy of the Kriging metamodel during the robust optimization process. Findings Five numerical and engineering cases are used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. The results illustrate that K-MORO is able to obtain robust Pareto frontier, while significantly reducing computational cost. Practical implications The proposed approach exhibits great capability for practical engineering design optimization problems that are multi-objective and constrained and have uncertainties. Originality/value A K-MORO approach is proposed, which can obtain the robust Pareto set under the interval uncertainty and ease the computational burden of the robust optimization process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document