scholarly journals Knowledge Status of X-Ray Department Managers of Istanbul Private Hospitals about Hospital Accreditation

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 01055
Author(s):  
Nuran Akyurt

JCI accreditation standards are an undertaking that provides continuity of improvement and development work that is guided by the development of patient care quality at the most appropriate level, the provision of a reliable patient care environment, and the reduction of the risks of patient and service providers. The purpose of our work is to determine the extent to which x-ray department managers from the Istanbul city’s private hospitals who are preparing for accreditation or have successfully completed the accreditation can apply the JCI accreditation standards, their knowledge level and their attitude about it. The study’s universe constitutes a total of 111 people serving as managers in the radiology departments of private hospitals operating in the province of Istanbul. A survey form was applied in the study. As a result, the education of the managers of the radiology services should be under the management of the persons with the expertise and experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 108010
Author(s):  
Subhajit Chakraborty ◽  
Hale Kaynak ◽  
José A. Pagán

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 775-782
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Fleisher ◽  
Clement R. Brown ◽  
Carter Zeleznik ◽  
Gerald H. Escovitz ◽  
Charles Omdal

In 1970, prior to present-day requirements for quality assurance programs, a project was undertaken to institute such a program voluntarily in ten hospitals. Five hospitals succeeded in fully implementing the program which was based on the "Bi-Cycle Process" and each documented improvements in desired patient care behaviors. Two hospitals partially implemented the process and demonstrated no significant changes in desired patient care behaviors. Two hospitals failed to provide the data upon which assessments could be made and one hospital never got beyond preliminary efforts at instituting the process. The project demonstrates that a voluntary quality assurance program is feasible and has important implications for PSROs and continuing medical education. It also provides evidence that attention to psychosocial factors is essential in the institutionalization of programs designed to produce desired changes in patient care behaviors.


CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S86-S87
Author(s):  
P.K. Jaggi ◽  
R. Tomlinson ◽  
K. McLelland ◽  
W. Ma ◽  
C. Manson-McLeod ◽  
...  

Introduction: With ongoing medical advances and an increase in elderly and complex patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), there is a requirement for nurses to continue to gain new knowledge and skills to provide optimal patient care. Quality initiatives are frequently introduced with the goal of improving patient safety and the effectiveness of care delivery; some being provincial, while others are new requirements from Accreditation Canada. We sought the perspectives of emergency nurses regarding the importance of key ED processes and standards, and their impact on patient care and nurse efficiency. Methods: All Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses throughout the Edmonton Zone EDs were invited to complete an online survey consisting of 23 statements on nursing attitudes (10 on nursing duties) and beliefs (11 on the importance of Accreditation standards and their impacts; two that involved selecting the 5 most important nursing activities). The survey was constructed through an iterative approach. Response options included a 7-point Likert scale (‘very strongly disagree’ to ‘very strongly agree’). Median scores and interquartile ranges were determined for each survey statement. Results: A total of 433/1241 (34.9%) surveys were submitted. Respondents were predominantly Registered Nurses (91.4%), female (88.9%), and worked 0-5 years overall in the ED (43.7%). Overall, respondents were favourable (‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’) towards the Accreditation Canada standards and other quality initiatives. They were, however, ‘neutral’ towards universal domestic violence screening, and whether there is a difference between Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and med reconciliation. The top five nursing activities in terms of perceived importance were: vital sign documentation, recording of allergies, listening to patients’ concerns, hand hygiene, and obtaining a complete nursing history. Best Possible Medication History and the screening risk tools followed these. Conclusion: Despite their heavy workload, nurses strongly agreed on the importance of med reconciliation, falls risk, and skin care, but felt that improved documentation forms could support efficiency. Nursing perspective is valuable in informing future attempts to standardize, streamline, and simplify documentation, including the design and implementation of a provincial clinical information system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. S122
Author(s):  
I.A. Barata ◽  
L.V. Reda ◽  
S.R. Pardo ◽  
T. Pando ◽  
K. Maurice ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Prybil ◽  
Richard Peterson ◽  
Paul Brezinski ◽  
Gideon Zamba ◽  
William Roach ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Lusardi

Applying the best evidence to support nursing practice and generating new knowledge for use in practice are the hallmarks of excellence and allow practitioners to meet patient care quality and safety priorities. Although identifying a patient care problem comes easily to staff nurses, the process of clarifying the problem and channeling those ideas through to a practice change can be daunting for bedside nurses. This article provides guidance to staff nurses who want to identify a clinical problem and change practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document