An Example of the Role of Basic Science Research to Inform the Treatment of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
An alternative and complementary approach to randomized trials or other clinical research in unilateral vocal fold paralysis is to use basic science research in animal models to answer the following two questions: (1) how and why do asymmetries affect voice production?, and (2) how do various surgical procedures affect these asymmetries? In this article, we will discuss some of our approaches to the first question. All experiments discussed center around the presence and effects of vortices, or areas of rotational motion, between the folds due to a phenomenon known as flow separation. Therefore, the formation and properties of intraglottal flow separation vortices will be briefly discussed. Then, we will describe experiments that look at the effects of the flow separation vortices on three measures of laryngeal physiology important to voice production: flow skewing, acoustic intensity, and glottal efficiency. Finally, we will explore the effects of some asymmetries on the flow separation vortices and discuss implications for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Our work is early and has some clear limitations. Therefore, the goal of this article is not to fully answer any question, but to show an example of the type of information that can be addressed by research in excised canine larynges.